Verdict GUILTY

originally posted by: RMFX1

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

And he would have gotten one but.......stupid is as stupid does

See y'all keep makin ish up it's hilarious!

How is he wrong?

He's not wrong they just lyin

Its the chinese IP address translates in riddles.

Anyway i will leave all you angry, hurt multi cultural loving americans too it and I will fall asleep knowing that finally justice was served.
a reply to: seeker1963

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

And he would have gotten one but.......stupid is as stupid does

See y'all keep makin ish up it's hilarious!

Exactly, deflect.


Cowards.

originally posted by: xuenchen

Guess all those DAILY Minneapolis trips behind the scene from Kamala Harris paid off...

Even the trip a recently as late last night to Minneapolis.

originally posted by: RMFX1

originally posted by: Wookiep

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: canucks555

Question for you:

How does one get convicted for second-degree unintentional murder, third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, all on one person?

Let's ignore the fact that Floyd was loaded full of drugs, and fought the police when they arrested him. Ignore that for now. Just ask yourself how does one commit unintentional murder and manslaughter?

Honestly this is confusing to me as well. How can any act be considered intentional and unintentional at the same time?

I think the idea is that it becomes felony murder. Unintentional death while wilfully commiting a felonious act, hence square peg in round hole.

I guess that's the best explanation we're gonna get? Still doesn't add up. It's almost like the jury was instructed to not allow the term "not guilty" to pop up under any circumstances. "shhhh we'll work through the technicalities later... But we can't have Minneapolis burn to the ground!".

Oh boy this thread...trollposters just outta the woodwork...I predict many removed posts...this isn't the mudpit...

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: RMFX1

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: RMFX1
a reply to: canucks555

You clearly didn't watch the trial and obviously are ignorant to the evidence.

That could be said of the jury.

The problem with the jury is that they have probably been watching the news.

How? They were incommunicado. Probably?

Got any evidence for this?

Then why did the Judge feel the need to warn them about seeing any news? Doesn't sound like "incommunicado" to me.

Please get a grip.

Wow, you must have commented to the wrong person. You didn't even take into consideration what I said. Now, how about doing that and explaining why the Judge warned the jurors not to watch any news. Bet you won't do that, you're too blind. But, prove me right. I'll be waiting. (Forever, probably.)

Why? Cos it's normal practice. What's your problem with that?

Forever? Not.

You're getting further and further mixed up in your mind. I already knew it was normal practice for a Judge to instruct the jury to not listen to the news. You then said, they couldn't have been influenced because they were incommunicado. If they were truly incommunicado, the Judge wouldn't have had to warn them. Do you see how what you said had no bearing to reality. Well, I guess you don't or you wouldn't keep trying to argue.

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: RMFX1
a reply to: seeker1963

Same thing happened to me a few pages back. I don't think Chauvin is guilty of murder..so KKK white supremacist.

They want you to get upset and try to prove you are not racist, while no one has done more to promote and set racism back 100 years than the mental midgets who have misused the term to shut down any discussion contrary to their beliefs. I laugh at them when they try to insinuate I am something that I am not and it drives them nuts. The trap they set becomes worthless to them when you don't play their game.

Traps? I couldn't care less about these games, if these people who I don't know and will never meet want to paint me in a way that fits their little life missions because I disagree with their opinion well, I don't #ing care.

originally posted by: knoxie
the usual ats "conspiracy theorists" who love provoking civil war are butt hurt and whining as usual. the lack integrity on this site is astounding.

Coming from someone who hasn't contributed a thing to ATS.

Nice input.🙄

a reply to: seeker1963

What you mean YOU people?

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Assassin82

I genuinely think a case could be made for jury tampering

The jury was not tampered with. What you are actually trying to say is jury influencing. There is a difference.

Fair enough. I appreciate the clarification.

Can we stop fighting a bit to report on what is happening? Jeepers.

mobile.twitter.com...

Protesters already blocking traffic and jumping on a semi.

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Assassin82

I genuinely think a case could be made for jury tampering

The jury was not tampered with. What you are actually trying to say is jury influencing. There is a difference.

Fair enough. I appreciate the clarification.

Ultimately it equates to the same thing. The outcome is the same it's semantics.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: seeker1963

What you mean YOU people?

Where did I say "You people" in that reply you contributed to me? It isn't there, and even if it was, IDGAF.

originally posted by: SuperStudChuck
Can we stop fighting a bit to report on what is happening? Jeepers.

mobile.twitter.com...

Protesters already blocking traffic and jumping on a semi.

They are protesting a guilty verdict?
Yikes

originally posted by: canucks555

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

What does some of your folk mean?

Kinda like how Lynne wood and "Q" duped those who aren't too bright.

Ah, yes. "Q"

"Communist Democrat Handbook Of Snappy Comebacks And One-Liners Useful For Deflection" snappy comeback #7 - "Q."

You get an "A" for memorizing your lesson book and using those words in a sentence.

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: RMFX1

originally posted by: EternalShadow

originally posted by: RMFX1
a reply to: canucks555

You clearly didn't watch the trial and obviously are ignorant to the evidence.

That could be said of the jury.

The problem with the jury is that they have probably been watching the news.

How? They were incommunicado. Probably?

Got any evidence for this?

Then why did the Judge feel the need to warn them about seeing any news? Doesn't sound like "incommunicado" to me.

Please get a grip.

Wow, you must have commented to the wrong person. You didn't even take into consideration what I said. Now, how about doing that and explaining why the Judge warned the jurors not to watch any news. Bet you won't do that, you're too blind. But, prove me right. I'll be waiting. (Forever, probably.)

Why? Cos it's normal practice. What's your problem with that?

Forever? Not.

You're getting further and further mixed up in your mind. I already knew it was normal practice for a Judge to instruct the jury to not listen to the news. You then said, they couldn't have been influenced because they were incommunicado. If they were truly incommunicado, the Judge wouldn't have had to warn them. Do you see how what you said had no bearing to reality. Well, I guess you don't or you wouldn't keep trying to argue.

Being a UK lawyer i do understand this stuff. You don't..

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: CagliostroTheGreat

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: theruthlessone
Did you watch the 9 minute video of a human kneeling on another humans head until he breathed his last breath. I know you americans like to wear white dresses and burn crosses with black people on them, but this was murder and justice has been served for once. =a reply to: rigel4

I have feeling your IP isn't in England but China.

Damn y'all really out here just making crap up to make yourselves feel better. Truly fascinating 🤔

You have been doing a bang up job of posting your opinion, so why is it wrong for anyone who disagrees with yours?

Hey dawg by all means me and the homies are clownin pretty hard on y'all rn so keep it up tbh

Your posts are very well written, what's with the ebonics all the sudden?

originally posted by: seeker1963

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: seeker1963

What you mean YOU people?

Where did I say "You people" in that reply you contributed to me? It isn't there, and even if it was, IDGAF.

Lighten up francis, it's called sarcasm