Senate Votes Trump ‘Won the Election in a Landslide’

Trump still owns every democrats mind and attention.

a reply to: andy06shake

either you're a bot or an old mfer who can't see the forest through the trees. when did this site get infiltrated so badly with sheeple? the whole #ing system is rigged against the common people on every level and institution

You bothered to write all this, when what you actually meant was "a largely partisan vote occurred due to senators not wishing to lose votes back home."

The spin you people attempt is frankly laughable.

I love that cult45 seem to think a POTUS is free to do whatever he or she wants in their final month or so. Makes perfect sense.

originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: MotherMayEye

If that's the case, how come Trump hasn't been sworn in again, then? The last time I checked, he's still out of office. Maybe that's because over 60 courts threw out his case... and his assault on the capital was stopped.

Court cases still in progress for one thing.
If the case is he won by a landslide and he was correct about the election fraud, he cannot be impeached for making false allegations. If he did not win, it is not Constitutionally legal for him to be impeached as a private citizen, alas The communists in Congress decided to lump both articles into one.

originally posted by: kazootica
a reply to: andy06shake

either you're a bot or an old mfer who can't see the forest through the trees. when did this site get infiltrated so badly with sheeple? the whole #ing system is rigged against the common people on every level and institution

exactly, and when did everyones mind change? pretty sure everyone accepted the fact there were always at least dark pools and bad apples that took advantage of the system. I dont understand why a conspiracy theory with little info could last so long and be taken as potentially real and then when theres tons of data pointing to something potentially real but secret or corrupt, the people run further away from exposing the truth. Who cares what direction the truth favors anyway if you are a civilian. Thats why i rely on the traffic sentiment models bc if people care they will GOOGLE IT

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: TheGoondockSaint

Anyone who reasons BIden could not get 81 million votes down to the size of Trump rallies anywhere on Earth, never mind Wisconsin, simply dont understand how voting works.

See ones a rally and the other to cast a vote used to express a wish to follow a particular course of action.

Im not saying your have gone full stupid.

But your reasoning is simply incorrect on a multitude of different levels.

oh right cause 81 million people were too afraid to go to a rally

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Voting and rallies are not the same thing.

Simple, really.

Afraid to contract COVID 19 indeed with the crazy muppets super spreader events. LoL

Anyhow Trump had Biden's rallies for him, at least to a fashion.

And they certainly had the desired affect aka record turnout and votes for Joe.

a reply to: kazootica

Capitol letter there with the word "either". x

I'm old enough to know better put it that way.

As to your derogatory "mfer" comment, ive never met your Mum, or if i have i dont recall.

Yes, you sound pretty common, so there is that.

Have a nice day and and the next 4 years.

As to institutions, i imagine you know a lot about those.

a reply to: mamabeth

Your sure of rather a lot without one iota of proof.

Can God not sort it out for Donald?

Guess not.

a reply to: tonycodes

Cheers for the edit tonycodes.

How's that proof of wide spread voter fraud?

Wee quick summery would not go a miss.

Enlighten me and the rest of us as to my error of thought.

originally posted by: Arnie123
I mean, Pelosis threw a fit....

That would be "Maximus Psychosis Pelosis." ...No?

Wearing her Cowboy "Schoomers", while riding her "McConnellope?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tonycodes

Cheers for the edit tonycodes.

How's that proof of wide spread voter fraud?

Wee quick summery would not go a miss.

Enlighten me and the rest of us as to my error of thought.

I agreed with the OP, thats it. As far as the links go, those arent for anyone agreeing with the OP, thats for anyone who disagrees with the OP. Apparently the Supreme Court still is investigating the election for fraud, figured yall that dont think trump is accurate about it and rallied a march around it that let to an impeachment trial of his post presidency is something yall could challenge with the Supreme Courts own dockets on the matter. Is there any other source that you would trust presenting potential evidence on the matter to prove or disprove trumps claims that got him dragged into court and aquitted? BC ill neatly make that easy to investigate for you too if its gonna lead to some transparency. no worries

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: tonycodes

I'm not sure that's intelligible. The 'highest courts' did not rule that election fraud was real, the OP has taken 2+2 and somehow came up with 42, completely mangling what the text actually says to meet their own desired outcome.

Just to be clear, if people say there is evidence but they decide it doesn't need to be shown, chances are they never had it.

OP is saying they lumped in election fraud partly bc trump was a civilian as well and you cant impeach a civilian, and i dont know whos right, there is not one real lawyer in this thread? really... and i dont see how you can detach election fraud from this impeachment trial bc uhm there is no other dialogue or motive im aware of... to be clear i dont care who is president either, way above my paygrade, im interested in transparency and my spidey sense going off over this OPs implications

a reply to: tonycodes

Its not me you need to convince tonycodes.

I dont have a dog in the fight per-say bar a keen interest in mad Muppets with access to nuclear weapons.

Anyway problem solved in that dept for the time being anyroad.

If there was any real evidence tonycodes you would be able to point to it clearly, and highlight it, all in all its glory, majestically, for all to see, like a big beacon of Trump light.

Good luck with that.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: tonycodes

Its not me you need to convince tonycodes.

I dont have a dog in the fight per-say bar a keen interest in mad Muppets with access to nuclear weapons.

Any way problem solved in that dept for the time being anyroad.

If there was any real evidence tonycodes you would be able to point to it clearly, and highlight it, all in all its glory, majestically, for all to see, like a big beacon of Trump light.

Good luck with that.

not my dog, not my fight, courts have dockets of evidence and they are Bidens SCOTUS so apparently the dockets show election fraud is real or its not. i agree with the OP. pretty simple

a reply to: tonycodes

Courts have lots of things tonycodes.

Patience not so much.

Definitely no time for bullcrap cases, without any real evidence, other than the ramblings and lies, of poor misguided butthurt fools, that refuses to accept democracy in action.

Whats that now 50 down or so and counting?

The fight ended quite some time ago, with Joe the winner, and that's a fact.

a reply to: andy06shake

well this is Bidens SCOTUS with the dockets right? so i would imagine he knows theres evidence in those dockets that shows trump is false, dont you think? or are the scotus docs are as useless as you say? if you want to be nuetral thats cool too, plenty of places to play on ats and not here

a reply to: tonycodes

Nope.

But ""imagine"" might be the correct word.

You see ""evidence"" of something, that did not happen, is called ""fiction"".

Or as Kellyanne Conway would say ""Alternative facts.""

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Voting and rallies are not the same thing.

Simple, really.

Afraid to contract COVID 19 indeed with the crazy muppets super spreader events. LoL

Anyhow Trump had Biden's rallies for him, at least to a fashion.

And they certainly had the desired affect aka record turnout and votes for Joe.

Funny how 81 million people supported Biden but were too afraid of a faux pandemic to go to a rally.
Look here’s the deal .... there was massive voter fraud and the evidence is still in play.
In Marxism, the ends justify the means, and for the Marxists trying to turn our country communist, the ends justify all
The evil means, and that includes the voter fraud and all the people, countries, NGOs and private entities, government operatives, and civilian activists and election officials and volunteers and technical hardware and software involved.