Senate Votes Trump ‘Won the Election in a Landslide’

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: blueman12

I think you might find that was Trump that took things to far hence the impeachment trials over capitol riots and invasion of government buildings.

Well, I think Trump didn't take it far enough. The election was a fraud and Congress ignored any evidence of it.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: blueman12

You cant teach pork blueman12.

The Man can do no wrong in there uneducated eyes.

Trump could crap on there living room rug, impregnated there 16 year old daughters, and they would say thank you.

They think he can walk on water.

And the fact of the matter is he cannot even manage flights of stairs.

Correction,Trump does not walk on water,Yeshua/Jesus walked on water.
I support Trump but I get sick and tired of people who think he is worshipped
by his supporters.I don't worship Trump,I worship my Heavenly Father only!

a reply to: mamabeth

Paragraph or two might be nice mamabeth.

As POTUS Biden's been there less than a few months realistically, give the Man a chance ffs. LoL

The administration has already committed to numerous executive orders that focus on major reversals of certain Trump policies and centre tackling COVID-19 as major priority, so there's that for a start.

If you dont imagine it's Biden running the show who is then may i ask?

233 year old documents could indeed be considered to be an outdated document, but it's the spirit of the original that counts their does it not?

American people lost there jobs because of COVID 19 and Donald Trumps entire treatment of the whole affair, Biden had little to do in that dept far as i can establish.

Who are these enemies hell bent on destroying your country???

Russia, China perchance? LoL

Nobody coming to get America or has the capability to invade your shores and thats a fact!

Your simply sounding like a mad QAnon nutter now mamabeth, try and keep it real mate, its the only way to travel and make any sense of the world.

Edit: Cheers for the paragraph, its easier on the old skyballs you see.

a reply to: mamabeth

a reply to: blueman12

Then present your evidence of widescale election fraud.

Where's that now???

Nowhere to be seen nor found in any sort of meaningful or unequitable fashion.

Hence your predicament.

Ok last Stab at this, all court rulings have inheritance like justice and freedom. Looks to me like insurrection was replacing election fraud as an inheritance and now insurrection is a no mas so election is back in as an inheritance. Akin to like a reverse collateral attack, It may take another ruling to make it official but the result of that next ruling is already decided and unbreakable even before it happens.

So I’m trying to understand if election fraud was inheritance in this ruling and I’m well aware it was not claimed up front in the impeachment.

Also if the highest courts did just somehow rule that election fraud was real and trump was accurate, than no other evidence is needed. Unless there is another court established to fight the ruling of election fraud being accurate to trumps statements later on. THEN you would see such evidence, not now.

a reply to: andy06shake

We are in the end times and God will be sending Yeshua/Jesus back soon.
Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess Yeshua/Jesus is Lord!

a reply to: andy06shake

I have a few things I would like to say,but my husband
just woke up.I will be back later,trust me!

a reply to: mamabeth

No proof of that mince any more than you have proof of election fraud mamabeth.

Any idea how many generations past came to the conclusion we are at end times and turned out to be just and misguide and wrong as yourself???

It's always the end times mate.

Here's a thought maybe its not the end, but the end of the beginning? x

a reply to: mamabeth

Well its just banter and debate mamabeth.

Spit-balling the little idiosyncrasies of life the universe and politics can wait.

You go do your thing, always a pleasure.

originally posted by: tonycodes
a reply to: uncommitted

honestly I dont understand your response.

I'm not quite sure what the difficulty is.

I responded to a claim that was saying the impeachment took place to settle who had won the election. I said it wasn't because.... it wasn't.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: uncommitted

The strongest arguments, imo, are that ballots which do not conform to the laws created by the state legislatures are illegal by definition and should be discarded.

No one in Congress would stand for it if they lost an election due to illegal ballots.

But they didn't did they? That claim was shot down as soon as it was raised. You are just randomly throwing these in now aren't you?

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: uncommitted

The strongest arguments, imo, are that ballots which do not conform to the laws created by the state legislatures are illegal by definition and should be discarded.

No one in Congress would stand for it if they lost an election due to illegal ballots.

But they didn't did they? That claim was shot down as soon as it was raised. You are just randomly throwing these in now aren't you?

"Shot down?" No. There are still cases pending before the SCOTUS on these grounds. The state legislatures agreed governors and judges usurped their plenary power. Also, just because they 'shot down' any effort to remedy it, it doesn't change the fact that illegally cast ballots were counted and included in the final totals. Those facts are not in dispute.

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: andy06shake

Biden the lesser of two evils? How is his track record so far?
What good has he done for our country? our citizens? Is he even
running the show or is he a front man only? Does he even support
our laws and constitution or does he think it's an outdated document?
How many American people have lost jobs? How many illegals will
be brought in and given jobs that our people should have?

The list goes on,in my opinion,Biden does not support the U.S.A.
and her citizens.He is helping our enemies in destroying our country.
I really should say his handlers are doing all these things in his name.
He probably wakes up everyday wondering where he is.

Lot of questions there,

Did the Mexicans build the wall with their money?
Is Hilary Clinton in jail?
Do you now have a world leading health service?

Three key elections promises, 4 years to achieve them. All failed. He improved his goal though, spent more time on leisure activities than other presidents, something he regularly (falsely) accused Obama of.

a reply to: andy06shake

The evidence is massive. It's so big, too big, but ignored . So sad.

a reply to: blueman12



Where's that then?

If its "so big" how can we not see the stuff in spades?

Is it made of dark matter per-chance, is that the problem?

a reply to: andy06shake

It's basically a super massive black hole. Venture too far and you'll be consumed.

a reply to: blueman12

3 strikes blueman12.

Your out im afraid.

Just like everyone else.

You fail to provide the goods.

No shame there, as its kind of hard to produce the non-existent.

As to super massive black holes, that's what the likes of QAnon represent, the amount of poor sods that manage to fall down that rabbit hole with out a ladder of common sense to get back out.

Its all fun and games right up until sanity is sitting in the back seat giving you directions towards the mad hatter's tea party.

a reply to: tonycodes

I'm not sure that's intelligible. The 'highest courts' did not rule that election fraud was real, the OP has taken 2+2 and somehow came up with 42, completely mangling what the text actually says to meet their own desired outcome.

Just to be clear, if people say there is evidence but they decide it doesn't need to be shown, chances are they never had it.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: uncommitted

The strongest arguments, imo, are that ballots which do not conform to the laws created by the state legislatures are illegal by definition and should be discarded.

No one in Congress would stand for it if they lost an election due to illegal ballots.

But they didn't did they? That claim was shot down as soon as it was raised. You are just randomly throwing these in now aren't you?

"Shot down?" No. There are still cases pending before the SCOTUS on these grounds. The state legislatures agreed governors and judges usurped their plenary power. Also, just because they 'shot down' any effort to remedy it, it doesn't change the fact that illegally cast ballots were counted and included in the final totals. Those facts are not in dispute.

Yes they are in dispute, you just think they aren't because frankly, I'm not sure where you get your information from but you have a very novel way of processing it.