A 28 Year Old Wisconsin Mom Dies Days After Second Pfizer Shot

a reply to: MrRCflying

After looking at that site and other stories, I am not too impressed. They seem to cherry pick and twist things. If the numbers are true though, it still shows the vaccine is many times safer than covid. Vaccine deaths 271 out of 30+ million doses given. Covid deaths 500,000 out of 28 million confirmed cases. Not much to argue with those numbers.

I was under the impression that the vaccine in combination with a COVID infection is the real risk, not just getting the injection itself. How many of the 30+ million vaccinated that survived the jab will go on and get infected with the virus and die? That is the question here IMO. There would have to be a study of how many people who are vaccinated die from a COVID infection versus those who are not vaccinated and die from COVID.

a reply to: TheAMEDDDoc

Plenty of evidence people are dropping like flys.

SPAIN, February 15, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) —Forty-six nursing home residents who had received their first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s fast-tracked vaccination against COVID-19 at the beginning of January had died by the end of the month, Spanish media have reported.

Staff first reported a coronavirus outbreak at Nuestra Señora del Rosario (Our Lady of the Rosary), a nursing home in the province of Cadiz, Andalusia in Spain on January 12, in the wake of a vaccine distribution campaign.

The Ministry of Housing and Families intervened in the private facility which houses up to 145 residents and where local media reported on February 4ththat a further 28 of 94 residents as well as 12 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19.

At another nursing home in the same southwestern Spanish province, in Novo Sancti Petri, in Chiclani, 22 elderly residents died and 103 were infected following a vaccination campaign.

Similar outbreaks and death clusters following vaccination have been reported across the globe, including:


29 elderly people died in Norway shortly after receiving Pfizer’s vaccination.

13 deaths among 40 residents following vaccination at one nursing home in Germany were dismissed as “tragic coincidence.”

10 deaths in a German palliative care patients within hours to four days of COVID-19 vaccination were deemed a “coincidence.”

22 of 72 residents of a nursing home in Basingstoke, England have died following vaccination.

24 seniors at a nursing home in Syracuse, NY were reported to have died from COVID-19 as of January 9, 2021 despite having been vaccinated beginning December 22, 2020.

10 cases of COVID-19 were reported on January 28 among seniors who had received both doses of Pfizer’s vaccine at one care home in Stockholm Sweden. The residents were vaccinated on December 27 and again on January 19.

The COVID-19 death toll in the small British enclave of Gibraltar numbered 16 before it launched its Pfizer vaccination campaign on January 10, 2021 and then shot up to 53 deaths 10 days later and to 70 seven days after that. According to a Reuters report, the Gibraltar Health Authority declared there was “no evidence at all of any causal link” between 6 of the deaths that were investigated and the Pfizer’s vaccine, despite the individuals having tested negative for Covid-19 before vaccination, but positive “in the days immediately after.”

4,500 COVID-19 cases in Israel occurred in patients after they had received one dose of Pfizer’s vaccine and 375 of those vaccinated patients required hospitalization, Israeli news media reported on January 12.

Seven adults living in a care home in Saskatoon tested positive for coronavirus a week after residents were vaccinated at the Sherbrooke Community Centre, the CBC reported. There were no positive cases at the time of vaccination.

Seven residents at a Montreal long-term care facility tested positive for Covid-19 within 28 days of being vaccinated with Pfizer’s vaccine, prompting the province of Quebec to delay the second Pfizer dose.

Abercorn Care Home in Scotland, which began COVID-19 vaccinations on December 14, 2020 was home to an outbreak of the virus by January 10 and the National Health Service for the region refused to comment on whether vaccinated residents were ill. A care home staff group founder told the Scottish Daily Record : “We have had members of our group whose parents have had the vaccine and then two weeks later have tested positive for coronavirus.”

All of the residents at a home in Inverness, Scotland were vaccinated against COVID-19 early in January, but 17 became infected with the virus after the first dose.

The UK Medical Freedom Alliance – a group of doctors, scientists, lawyers and other professionals who advocate for informed consent in the United Kingdom – published an urgent open letter to Nadhim Zahawi, Minister for COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment; Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care; and two vaccine oversight agencies calling for an immediate audit of the deaths following vaccination in the U.K.

The group refers to graphs showing a surge in care home deaths and cites data from the Office for National Statistics that residents’ deaths tripled in the two weeks between 8th and 22nd January 2021 at a time when there was a massive increase in the rate of vaccinations in care homes.

Similar graphs for Israel, Ireland, Bahrain and Jordan show a similar correlation.

LINK

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: MrRCflying

After looking at that site and other stories, I am not too impressed. They seem to cherry pick and twist things. If the numbers are true though, it still shows the vaccine is many times safer than covid. Vaccine deaths 271 out of 30+ million doses given. Covid deaths 500,000 out of 28 million confirmed cases. Not much to argue with those numbers.

I was under the impression that the vaccine in combination with a COVID infection is the real risk, not just getting the injection itself. How many of the 30+ million vaccinated that survived the jab will go on and get infected with the virus and die? That is the question here IMO. There would have to be a study of how many people who are vaccinated die from a COVID infection versus those who are not vaccinated and die from COVID.

Exactly. And they could just get the common flu virus and go into a deadly reaction also.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

That’s not evidence, that is data that needs to be studied and interpreted, correctly. I do hope they do a systemic review or meta analysis or some type of study on all population groups because that is the data that we need and you are absolutely correct about needing that data. Different ages and populations can respond very differently to a vaccine. I see deaths, around the time of COVID exposure or vaccine administration. We have no access to health data, what was actually going on, what happened inside their bodies, anything really. It’s far from conclusive and there isn’t really anything to compare it to because they are just locations where people died who also received a vaccine.

What’s the normal mortality rate in these places? What type of care do they provide? Are we giving the vaccine to populations under palliative care? What diseases did they have? Did they have other infections? There is no way we can make a conclusion at this point.

If the vaccine is as immunogenic as it seems, I could see there being issues in patients with certain inflammatory conditions or other diseases. It would be nice to actually know rather than guessing and sifting through garbage.

originally posted by: CJCrawley
a reply to: lordcomac

I do not trust this establishment to allow me to go about the rest of my life without taking their mandatory jabs.

Not mandatory, just offering it. Plenty refuse. The MIB have their work cut out.

Semantics

We don’t have to take it but we will no longer be free. We will be second class citizens.

Trudeau Says COVID Vaccines Not 'Mandatory' But Not Getting Them Could Have 'Consequences'

www.narcity.com...

In the US most of the dead from covid injection, will go under the table and blame as pre existing conditions, by the time any data is collected for analysis it will be too late as usual and with the protection for this injection makers and promoters no a penny will reimbursed to families and loves ones.

originally posted by: lakenheath24
As you heard it? One should provide evidence for such assertions.

www.telegraph.co.uk...#:~:text=Taking%20a%20daily%20aspirin,attacks%20and%2 0strokes%2C%20researchers%20said.

Again, if the idea is to kill peeps, why go through the trouble, and expense, of creating a vaccine that kills one in 15 million???? Why not just let the virus rip like Cuomo did in the wrinklies homes?

a reply to: Phoenix

Over the next two years I guess we will see the numbers.
The way it is being done it will be blamed on the new strains as they "appear".

originally posted by: lakenheath24
3,000 peeps a year die from aspirin, we gonna spaz out about that?


I mean, thats some damn stupid people trying to depopulate the planet.....literally ONE person in 15 million.

If we are going to freak out over inflated COVID death counts why not this too as it all borders on the same paranoid that is pushed...

a reply to: SeaWorthy

the goal is depopulation.

The vaccine will make most people who get it infertile. It might even be sexually transmitted.

The goal isn't to kill everyone right away, that would be too obvious and the people will revolt. (which i think will happen anyway)

The goal is to keep their authority and good standing with the people while they slowly kill them off.

a reply to: TheAMEDDDoc

They haven't done the testing so of course their is no evidence other than dead bodies. The animal testing has not been done right???? Then it is illegal to experiment on humans.

LMAO. So what is the OP then? A single death is the beginning of a mass extinction event?

Absurd.


My point is that if peeps are willing to accept a baseline of 3,000 deaths a year for a medicine that is universally viewed as harmless, then ONE death from a vaccine shot shouldnt even move the panic needle.









a reply to: Hecate666

a reply to: Doctor Smith

If you don't want to get vaccinated then this is your right. I don't support mandatory vaccination. But, you should alert other people to this fact so that they can make an educated choice about whether or not they feel safe being near you.

Maybe you should wear a badge declaring your non vaccinated status. Or put it on a hat or a t-shirt.

Then at least other people will have a choice just like you have a choice.

Not being vaccinated should be treated like open carry.

You've got a gun, as is your legal right, and because it has to be visible everybody around you knows that you're armed and can choose how they feel about you from an educated position.

No secrets, everything out for all to see. Everybody has the information that they need.

a reply to: St Udio

The problem when vaccines are developed is that the company that first patents them gets the licence to manufacture and distribute exclusively for a set period to allow them to claw back the money they sunk into developing it. Then, once the licence is expired it's then opened up to other companies. Hence Viagra is no longer the only drug of its ilk when once it was.

The welfare of the end user should come before the profit of the manufacturer.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I do agree with this. It's only fair.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Doctor Smith

If you don't want to get vaccinated then this is your right. I don't support mandatory vaccination. But, you should alert other people to this fact so that they can make an educated choice about whether or not they feel safe being near you.

Maybe you should wear a badge declaring your non vaccinated status. Or put it on a hat or a t-shirt.

Then at least other people will have a choice just like you have a choice.

Not being vaccinated should be treated like open carry.

You've got a gun, as is your legal right, and because it has to be visible everybody around you knows that you're armed and can choose how they feel about you from an educated position.

No secrets, everything out for all to see. Everybody has the information that they need.

No. What you’re suggesting is we all get placards, barcodes, brands or a yellow hexagon.

It ain’t my fault or anyone else’s if we choose not to get the vaccine(s). What you’re suggesting is the governments of the world mandate that because i didn’t go along with the dog and pony show I now “need to be held accountable”

I don’t like your logic. You’re backing their play here

Edit: the fact Big Pharma can’t be sued should tell you everything....

originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I do agree with this. It's only fair.

No. It’s not

originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
a reply to: MrRCflying

After looking at that site and other stories, I am not too impressed. They seem to cherry pick and twist things. If the numbers are true though, it still shows the vaccine is many times safer than covid. Vaccine deaths 271 out of 30+ million doses given. Covid deaths 500,000 out of 28 million confirmed cases. Not much to argue with those numbers.

I was under the impression that the vaccine in combination with a COVID infection is the real risk, not just getting the injection itself. How many of the 30+ million vaccinated that survived the jab will go on and get infected with the virus and die? That is the question here IMO. There would have to be a study of how many people who are vaccinated die from a COVID infection versus those who are not vaccinated and die from COVID.

I agree with you!
Rainbows
Jane

a reply to: AaarghZombies
I have heard that the vaccinated can still contract covid but they get less serious symptoms........so they can still infect others.
If they are showing no symptoms they will be invisible spreaders.

In fact, most vaccines don't fully protect against infection, even if they can block symptoms from appearing. As a result, vaccinated people can unknowingly carry and spread pathogens. Occasionally, they can even start epidemics.

www.bbc.com...#:~:text=There's%20no%20evidence%20that% 20any,prospects%20of

originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: Doctor Smith

SO instead of immunizing them the vaccine has instead made at least some of the recipient's hyper allergic to the virus.

Very worrying news.

Same thing happened with the previous SARS vaccine. China rushed their vaccine and it ended up causing people to have a more severe reaction, and honestly it doesn't surprise me that there are people linking the SARS-CoV-1 to SARS-Cov-2.

a reply to: slatesteam

Been searching for a source for that statement. Got any?