Donald Trump acquitted in second impeachment trial

The event at the capitol was not planned

At all

President Trump did not incite any violence or even suggest that anyone storm a building

Not by ANYONES definition


Which is why he was acquitted

The impeachment was a lie. Based on lies

It’s HILARIOUS that some people are upset about it

And now: there will NOT be any charges laid against President Trump, AT ALL. And that’s upsetting the lowest of the IQ’s too.

He’s not getting divorced. He’s not getting arrested. He’s not being cancelled or doxxed. He’s not going broke and he’s not ‘finished’

All of which is upsetting for those who cannot think for themselves

a reply to: Sookiechacha
Yet the second aquittal is oh so sweet

Coming to a polling booth near you in 2024! Trump and or Trump family

No more goofy democracy where every uninformed yahoo gets a say

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Not was he ever "frog marched" from anywhere - not for conspiring with non existent russian spies and not for the stream of invented democrat lies

a reply to: JBurns

No more goofy democracy where every uninformed yahoo gets a say

Is that what happened in the Senate yesterday?

a reply to: Sookiechacha

There's nothing to pursue. The argument that he incited what turned out to be a pre-planned attack is bunk. The bombs were positioned the night before.

His team proved the same crap was said by Democrabs over and over with no consequences.

Trump made the statement that they'd (rally) go and PEACEFULLY and patriotically make their minds known. HTF is that incitement?

It's a fact that the election was stolen. All the footage of rescanned ballots and boxes of ballots coming in after the deadline prove it. Observers and other officials have verified it with sworn statements.

The left is spinning their wheels in the sand, and they can go pound it.

I'm behind Trump now more than ever. You can't screw over a third of the country and expect to get away with it.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

...

McConnell also said, during his official address, that the House Impeachment Managers proved their case, and that Trump is guilty as hell and did incite the violent attack on the Capitol and Congress. He went on to say that this case is the now under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.

In fishing, we call that "Chum".

How many more hate filled dems will rise to the surface? Dozens upon dozens. And they'll be hooked one by one and exposed to the noonday sun like the rotting corpses they are!

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
One side will think they are exposed and the other will think they are standing up for what is right, and the band marches on.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

According to Mitch McConnell's address to the Senate regarding the acquittal, he said that the trial was unconstitutional because Trump was a sitting president at the time of the trial. Trump wasn't a sitting president at the time of his House impeachment, and at the time when Mitch McConnell held the Senate leadership he refused to allow a trial UNTIL Biden's inauguration. So, it was his decision to make sure Senators had a "constitutional argumenta" cover under which to acquit.


McConnell also said, during his official address, that the House Impeachment Managers proved their case, and that Trump is guilty as hell and did incite the violent attack on the Capitol and Congress. He went on to say that this case is the now under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.

No.

The US Constitution itself is clear.

This FARCE was another hissy fit by Dems upset with TDS.
Trump did not incite any violence.


Democrats, however, did incite violence across the US in multiple US cities for MONTHS and is ongoing to this day.
Keep right on ignoring reality.

a reply to: HackScribbler

There's nothing to pursue.

Tell that to the Georgia DA!


Georgia prosecutor opens criminal investigation into Trump's "attempts to influence" election www.cbsnews.com...

Willis wrote in her letter that her office "has opened an investigation into attempts to influence the administration of the 2020 Georgia General Election. This investigation includes, but is not limited to, potential violations of Georgia law prohibiting the solicitation of election fraud, the making of false statements to state and local governmental bodies, conspiracy, racketeering, violation of oath of office and any involvement in violence or threats related to the election's administration."

The argument that he incited what turned out to be a pre-planned attack is bunk. The bombs were positioned the night before.

Not according to Mitch McConnell's summary of the case.

And, the House Impeachment Managers always alleged that the scheme and attack were planned for months.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

...

McConnell also said, during his official address, that the House Impeachment Managers proved their case, and that Trump is guilty as hell and did incite the violent attack on the Capitol and Congress. He went on to say that this case is the now under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.

In fishing, we call that "Chum".

How many more hate filled dems will rise to the surface? Dozens upon dozens. And they'll be hooked one by one and exposed to the noonday sun like the rotting corpses they are!

Is that why Republicans are eating their own and are so busy censuring Senators and voted to impeach?

a reply to: M5xaz

The US Constitution itself is clear.

What's clear in the Constitution is that the House has to sole power to impeach, and that the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments. It says nothing about a "January exception", where a president can do anything without congressional oversight and political consequences.

Trump did not incite any violence.

Again, that's not what Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said to the Senate. History is not on your side.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: HackScribbler

There's nothing to pursue.

Tell that to the Georgia DA!


Georgia prosecutor opens criminal investigation into Trump's "attempts to influence" election www.cbsnews.com...

Willis wrote in her letter that her office "has opened an investigation into attempts to influence the administration of the 2020 Georgia General Election. This investigation includes, but is not limited to, potential violations of Georgia law prohibiting the solicitation of election fraud, the making of false statements to state and local governmental bodies, conspiracy, racketeering, violation of oath of office and any involvement in violence or threats related to the election's administration."

The argument that he incited what turned out to be a pre-planned attack is bunk. The bombs were positioned the night before.

Not according to Mitch McConnell's summary of the case.

And, the House Impeachment Managers always alleged that the scheme and attack were planned for months.

McConnell has ZERO credibility as do your troll post. 🙄

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: M5xaz

The US Constitution itself is clear.

What's clear in the Constitution is that the House has to sole power to impeach, and that the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments. It says nothing about a "January exception", where a president can do anything without congressional oversight and political consequences.

Trump did not incite any violence.

Again, that's not what Republican Leader Mitch McConnell said to the Senate. History is not on your side.

Hello ?

TRUMP WAS OUT OF OFFICE !!
IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT APPLY - SEE US CONSTITUTION

And with respect to actual and ongoing INCITEMENT of VIOLENCE, FACE REALITY:

a reply to: Sookiechacha

I'm amused that you think any career politician tells the truth.

a reply to: Sookiechacha
What is clear is that common core math kicked your ass, again.
Lol

a reply to: mtnshredder

McConnell has ZERO credibility as do your troll post.

If citing Republican leadership is trolling, is Mitch McConnell also a troll?

The House never had a case to begin with. It’s why they had to submit doctored evidence. The biggest winners here are truth and justice.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

He’s INNOCENT

One hundred percent INNOCENT

Why is it so upsetting to you?

a reply to: M5xaz

TRUMP WAS OUT OF OFFICE !!

He was NOT out of office when he was impeached.

IMPEACHMENT DOES NOT APPLY - SEE US CONSTITUTION

The Constitution says no such thing. In fact, there is precedent for the Senate holding trials after an impeached official left office.

The Constitution lets the Senate define the rules for impeachment trials, and the Senate voted that it did have jurisdiction to try Trump on day one.

McConnell's excuse is circular, since he was the one who made sure the trial could not take place until after Biden was inaugurated, and then stated that a trial after a president was out of office is unconstitutional.

The fact that Mitch McConnell, in his summary, stated that Republicans voted to acquit because, in his opinion the Senate vote was wrong, has no baring on the fact that the Senate did vote that the trial was constitutional. And, it's their call. Therefore the trial was constitutional.

Brody: Common Core. 😂🤣😂