Finally! Forensic Election Audit in Maricopa County (AZ) Begins Next Week

a reply to: Annee

So you have no questions about it you just question whether my opinion is professional or not so you can dismiss?

And as someone who lives in Georgia and has for the last 50 years, I can tell you that Joe Biden won the state of Georgia because Georgia was sick of trump. We're sick of Elections supression! That's why all Ossof and Warnock won. I worked on a committee and talked with 100s of Georgia voters. Democrats and Republicans alike voted blue.

originally posted by: IndieA

originally posted by: MayRenee
I've probably already said this but, Jesus effing Christ, they've had the ballots over a month now. Here in Georgia they did a hand count in three days. It was true it was accurate, and it matched to electronic counts. All they're doing in Arizona is bull#. They don't have anything , they're not going to find anything, so now they've got to get somebody to tell him to get out of there so they can claim they were run off before they were finished. It's as plain as the nose on your face.

Georgia didn't do a full forensic audit or it would have taken much longer than a few days.
The paper ballots were never allowed to be forensically examined, although that request was made before the Georgia Senate.

As someone familiar with Georgia, there's no way in hell I believe that Biden came anywhere close to winning Georgia fairly. With any luck, Georgia will do a full forensic audit of their 2020 election in the near future and this will be revealed. The election hacking data is out there, it's only a matter of time before it's fully verified.

a reply to: MayRenee

...I'm documenting here...

How special.

But your purpose has already been defeated. Mine has already triumphed. Enough has already been exposed about the corruptions of process -- by corrupt people -- to know that serious reform is necessary and proper. The final report should tell us the extent, and the whys and wherefores, informing effective and efficient election reform.

Hopefully before the next election.

a reply to: Annee

Except dominion has admitted what you have already dismissed, and now you just don't care.

Why are the same ones saying it was the most secure election in history working on changing laws to make it more secure???

Nothing has been exposed. No evidence of fraud has been found.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: MayRenee

...I'm documenting here...

How special.

But your purpose has already been defeated. Mine has already triumphed. Enough has already been exposed about the corruptions of process -- by corrupt people -- to know that serious reform is necessary and proper. The final report should tell us the extent, and the whys and wherefores, informing effective and efficient election reform.

Hopefully before the next election.

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Annee

Except dominion has admitted what you have already dismissed, and now you just don't care.

Why are the same ones saying it was the most secure election in history working on changing laws to make it more secure???

You have official written documentation?

As far as objective — I’m probably the most objective person in this thread.

I was Republican for 40+ years. I know how they think.

And I’m not particularly Left — except on equality and women’s rights.

a reply to: MayRenee

Finding fraud was not my purpose... nor my end goal. My purpose for wanting the audit was to find the faults and weaknesses in the system. My end goal was for the Senate to correct and resolve those issues with proper election reform legislation. As is necessary and proper.

Hopefully before the next election.

If fraud was found, so be it. I certainly expect it. But if it's not, it doesn't affect my ultimate purpose and end goal.

a reply to: Annee

I'm aware of your viewpoint on yourself and your nonsensical spiels.

The fact that you think you know what everyone under a label thinks or that you believe they even think the same is telling in itself.

I have you admitting that you don't care if dominion turns over the information they are legally obligated to.

Should I go find someone elses viewpoint of you to determine if I should take you serious?

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Annee

I'm aware of your viewpoint on yourself and your nonsensical spiels.

The fact that you think you know what everyone under a label thinks or that you believe they even think the same is telling in itself.

I have you admitting that you don't care if dominion turns over the information they are legally obligated to.

Hyperbole much?

Your words, your thoughts, your opinions — not mine.

DP

a reply to: TheLead

FWIW I agree.
It’s people like that that made me give David icke a second listen

Maricopa County Supervisors Schedule Public Meeting Monday To “Lay Out The Facts” Before Tuesday Meeting Before AZ Senate

Statement from Chairman Jack Sellers on May 12 Letter from Senate President Fann

Yesterday I received a letter from the Senate President asking that members of the Board and other Maricopa County subject matter experts come to a meeting and resolve "three serious issues." At the same time, the Senate's audit Twitter account accused County election officials of deleting files off a server before it was delivered. That would be a crime -- and it is not true.

I know you have all grown weary of the lies and half-truths six months after the 2020 General Election. Our Board is tired of it too -- especially when those lies turn into threats directed at us and County employees who are public servants doing their job. It is dangerous to spout accusations of this magnitude via a tweet.

After reviewing the letter with County election and IT experts, I can say the allegations are false and ill-informed. Moreover, the claim that our employees deleted election files and destroyed evidence is outrageous, completely baseless and beneath the dignity of the Arizona Senate. I demand an immediate retraction of any public statements made to the news media and spread via Twitter.

The contractors hired by the Senate President are not auditors and they are not certified by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. It's clearer by the day: the people hired by the Senate are in way over their heads. This is not funny; this is dangerous.

The Board of Supervisors will hold a public meeting on Monday to refute lies and lay out facts about these issues.

Still no specifics. But since he thought it appropriate to post this screed on Maricopa County's official Twitter page, I certainly hope he'll also post the time and place for the meeting -- before it's over.

Quite frankly, all I want to hear from our Supervisors is how they are going to reconcile matters with the Senate ASAP. And they can do that at the public meeting the Senate invited them to for that very purpose.

I find this letter quite contemptuous to both the Senate and the people. They are there to do the people's business, and to do so in a professional and ethical manner.

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: TheLead

FWIW I agree.
It’s people like that that made me give David icke a second listen

I like David Icke.

IMO — what he has to say is reasonable.

We really do t know anything for sure.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Lots of rumblings behind the scenes as some people are getting real nervous !!! 😎

Can you elaborate?

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Annee

So you have no questions about it you just question whether my opinion is professional or not so you can dismiss?

originally posted by: IndieA

originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: Annee

So you have no questions about it you just question whether my opinion is professional or not so you can dismiss?

It's almost like you're saying cumulative decades of university study and billions of dollars in cutting edge research technology are all one giant scam and every biology degree ever printed is worth a roll of toilet paper.

a reply to: MayRenee

I am sure it had nothing to do with if you vote for these guys Ill get you a 2000 dollar check... err 1400 dollar check.

Something that I thought was illegal for years but yep thats what they did.

Warnock is exactly who he always was a died in the wool socialist, but ossof is a reprehensible human being and anyone that voted for him is sick in the head or highly ignorant if they did it to spite orangeman.

a reply to: Boadicea

Jack Sellers, more like Jack Sellout.

It's almost like you're saying cumulative decades of university study and billions of dollars in cutting edge research technology are all one giant scam and every biology degree ever printed is worth a roll of toilet paper.


I can't seem to post this right, but this ^ is TzarChasm's comment that I am replying to.

All of that goes out the window when multi-billion dollar agendas are at stake. Millions of dollars can be spent paying off scientists, doctors, and the media to push profitable agendas, and they are. Controlling popular opinion is big business.

Now, one can still think critically without dismissing decades of study and research.

Blindly believing someone, because you think that they have decades of study and research, without actually investigating the research, can be dangerous and lead to being deceived and flat out wrong.

a reply to: IndieA

Integrity & Money is definitely a slippery slope.