Fauci believes we need 80 percent vaccinations by fall to BEGIN getting back to normal

This is an excerpt from a local town newspaper interview allegedly. I think there is no way we get to 80% vaccinations ever, does that mean no return ever as well. Or is he just covering his ass? In a population of 330 million, I say 30% would never take it for various reasons. Ergo will they have to clamp down to get to 80%, inquiring minds want to know, how many of our politicians are believing this science.


www.facebook.com...

When will we get back to normal? That will depend on the number of people vaccinated. If we get to 80% vaccinations quickly and expeditiously, by the beginning of fall we can start getting back to normal. We can have enough protection to get kids safely back in school without teachers fearing they will be infected. We should be able to have events like sporting events & theaters with large groups by late fall. So, by the end of the year, we will feel much better than we do now.

Up to this point ... in the 'evolution of man' ... no one ever needed a vaccination for the Corona family of viruses.

If this was a gain-of-function virus released by the Chinee, we have a nuclear first-strike policy to implement.

Otherwise, like any member of the Corona Virus family ... this thing is milder than the Flu. Why worry?

You know Fauci's not taking any shot.
I mean, he may be a POS but he's not that stupid.

This shot is like a 'vaccine' for the gullible.
The masses, living in fear.

That's ok though, because fear is not a desired trait for the future of mankind.

a reply to: putnam6

I don't believe we are ever getting back to normal, maybe the new Great Reset control grid normal, but not the normal we know and love. As for Fauci, I found this 15 min video very telling regarding the origins of covid1984.

It's not the vaccine or COVID that is concerning, at least not to me it isn't, what concerns me is what lengths will TPTB go to play this up? It very well could be the tell the public this crap, so that the public will be happy with an earlier return, and/or the measures they have to go through to get there.

This is the same guy who predicted 5.7 or higher transmission rates for months after COVID arriving here in the US, best I can tell it quickly dropped from it's highest point in 2-3 weeks. At best he is CYA.

a reply to: putnam6

So it went from 70% to now 80%?

www.forbes.com... 936ed

"While the vast majority of experts agreed widespread immunization— roughly 70% of the population, epidemiologists believe—is the best way to beat the coronavirus pandemic, there’s uncertainty as to when that scale of vaccination can be achieved."

From what I've seen, I personally think 70% perhaps even a little higher percentage of the population would willingly get/take the 'vaccine'.

Me personally, I'll pass and besides, I have no reason to even take that shot or those shots and any new shots they come out with regarding this whole thing. Not taking the vaccine wouldn't affect my life in any way that I can see. And I have no problem wearing a mask. I like collecting them.

www.cnbc.com...

In Denmark they have proposed mandatory vaccinations for certain groups. There are mass protests and riots against it.

In this video they feel that they have succeeded in the thwarting mandatory vaccinations:

Denmark says no to vaccinations

I think people should take notice to the fact that they even proposed it. It shows the real possibility in the future that this can happen in any country.

They even proposed detaining those who did not comply.

originally posted by: ArchangelOger
a reply to: putnam6

So it went from 70% to now 80%?

www.forbes.com... 936ed

"While the vast majority of experts agreed widespread immunization— roughly 70% of the population, epidemiologists believe—is the best way to beat the coronavirus pandemic, there’s uncertainty as to when that scale of vaccination can be achieved."

From what I've seen, I personally think 70% perhaps even a little higher percentage of the population would willingly get/take the 'vaccine'.

Me personally, I'll pass and besides, I have no reason to even take that shot or those shots and any new shots they come out with regarding this whole thing. Not taking the vaccine wouldn't affect my life in any way that I can see. And I have no problem wearing a mask. I like collecting them.

www.cnbc.com...

I don't know if we can get to 70% and it damn sure isn't happening by fall even if everybody was wanting it, it's not happening logistically. Only 3,346,390 have received 2 doses 19.25 million have one dose. If they have to or are going to innoculate kids there is no way that gets done by fall. Even getting all the adults even if they were willing is going to be tricky in that time frame.

So is that happens what do they do about it? Just go oh well and drop it? For example here in Georgia, our numbers are on a decline in cases of hospitalizations and deaths the last 10 days, the first downward trend since 11/6. All of this and the state was 49th in people participating in getting the vaccine. Just 27% of those eligible last I checked, has done so.

Warning !!

They're setting up reasons and excuses for failure !!

🚨

originally posted by: nOraKat
In Denmark they have proposed mandatory vaccinations for certain groups. There are mass protests and riots against it.

In this video they feel that they have succeeded in the thwarting mandatory vaccinations:

Denmark says no to vaccinations

I think people should take notice to the fact that they even proposed it. It shows the real possibility in the future that this can happen in any country.

They even proposed detaining those who did not comply.

It sounds like it may be going to hell in a handbasket..it is the Daily Smell, so take it with a grain of salt. We need any of our fellow ATSers across the pond to chime in. After all every time the party goes to # there, Americans somehow are the last invited LOL. Or do we decline till it gets going real good? or we just like to be fashionably late. Regardless tensions are seemingly higher there than here, amazingly BTW, is it all just fluff, or is there substance to this.

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Dutch mayor warns the country is heading for 'civil war' following violent anti-curfew protests as France and Italy admit they're facing ANOTHER Covid-19 lockdown

Europe is in the midst of Covid chaos as countries race to tighten their restrictions amid high case numbers
France due decide on a third national lockdown this week; Italy's top medic has also called for new shutdown
Meanwhile the continent's vaccine program is in disarray, with France's Pasteur Institute admitting today that its vaccine doesn't work and AstraZeneca cutting supplies of its jab due to 'EU supply chain issues'
Disorder is also growing following riots in the Netherlands, with mayor warning 'we're on the path to civil war'


Meanwhile hopes that vaccines might provide a quick way out of the crisis all-but faded after France's Pasteur Institute was forced to scrap a jab it had been developing with US drug-maker Merck because it doesn't work.

The news came as AstraZeneca - whose jab has yet to be approved by EU regulators - announced it was cutting vaccine supplies to the continent by up to 60 per cent because of problems with supply chains, thought to be due to under-production at a factory in Belgium.

Head of the EU executive Ursula von der Leyen had a call with the firm on Monday to 'remind them of their commitments', but EU President Charles Michel admitted that vaccinating 70 per cent of Europe's population - the figure theoretically needed to ensure herd immunity - by the end of summer as planned will now be 'difficult'.

a reply to: putnam6

The closed a supermarket and turned it into a corona vaccination center I have not seen 1 person go in there. Its 5 blocks away from my house I drive by several times a day.

The only cars in the parking lot are the employees cars. They park in the employee lot across the road. Not one car is ever there you can see through the windows. The people inside are sitting around playing on their phones because they dont have anyone to vaccinate.

I'm 40 healthy as a horse and dont plan on taking the shot I doubt 80% of the population will take it either.

Fauci is loving the attention, fame and rush of power.

But now the election is over and he's not needed anymore.

NY, California, and Chicago are re-opening.

We're almost done here whether people take the vaccine or not.

That’s a number they will not ever reach unless they start forcing vaccinations. It will never happen voluntarily.

Welcome to the new normal.

Fauci needs to retire to a vineyard in Sicily where he can continue Gain Of Function studies on yeast strains. I'd try any wine he made with his Franken-yeast varieties, maybe.

He could work up some COVbernet Sauvignon, COVfandel, and CharVIDdonnay wines.

Fauci already admitted that he saw that 60 percent of Americans would be up to taking the vaccine. He pushed the herd immunity percentage given by the vaccine UP because he "felt" that Americans would be more likely to vaccinate due to that manipulation. He said so himself, the virus thread may have the article. It was a big deal then, too.

Kinda weird China doesn't have the vaccines and Wuhan is back to the party central town it apparently used to be.

From what I have been reading here in the UK, the beat the vaccine offers is a dilution of symptoms rather than a prevention of infection. Even then the efficacy of these vaccines is looking to be nowhere near the 90%+ claimed by Big Phama. So all in all, what’s the damn point?

Weird things are happening too. An NHS call centre rolled out the vaccine to 35 staff. All 35 went down with Covid at exactly the same time. You won’t hear this in the press, but I know the call centre manager.

People are dying after the jab too. Couldn’t give you the figures but I know through contacts of 3 so far. I don’t know anyone who has died from Covid.

Countries are also clamping down on anyone or anything seen as anti vax. They’re at pains to paint these vaccines as safe - and yet certain mutations already put them into question and further mutations will require rapid alteration of the vaccines. None of this is good. It makes little sense.

I still do not trust that vaccine, I do not think that it is nearly as effective as they say, it can't be, previous vaccines they tried for coronaviruses and SARS failed most times in the long term. The RNA vaccines have not had a very good track record either. Maybe this vaccine was made safer, but is it actually even close to as effective as they say? The reason that they give this in two doses is because it causes way more problems when given in a single dose. What about differences in people's metabolisms, those enzymes can vary in people widely, how will this effect some people who have different metabolomics?

a reply to: putnam6


Getting back to normal does not depend on the end total of vaxed people.

It depends on the total number of people who remember where their testicles and ovaries are, and use the ensuing related fortitude to remind politicians and their appointed lapdogs to remember who's their actual boss (WE ARE) and put feet down. Nobody needs to run roughshod around towns, or riot to do this.

Just stop doing what the government tells us. There is strength in numbers when it comes to P/A fighting such as this.

originally posted by: rickymouse
I still do not trust that vaccine, I do not think that it is nearly as effective as they say, it can't be, previous vaccines they tried for coronaviruses and SARS failed most times in the long term. The RNA vaccines have not had a very good track record either. Maybe this vaccine was made safer, but is it actually even close to as effective as they say? The reason that they give this in two doses is because it causes way more problems when given in a single dose. What about differences in people's metabolisms, those enzymes can vary in people widely, how will this effect some people who have different metabolomics?

I strongly suspect there will be severe unintended epigenetic changes down the road. IMO, cancers will spike worse than MI pollution cancer cases.Edit: yes, two totally different things there, bad analogy for sticklers out there, I admit. But in more plain English, I think future generations are going to see cancer spikes much in the same way Michiganders are acquainted with seeing pockets of cancers cropping up in places polluted long ago.

Actually, weren't you the one who first suspected as much way back? or was that another poster of equal research capability?