Constitutional Lawyer Reveals Trump's Killshot to Defeat Voter Fraud

originally posted by: dragonridr
The supreme court is not going to invalidate millions of votes, If they did that would vioate everything this country stands for. This would totally destroy democracy in this country and we would just be moving to dictatorship.

Rotflmao!

Sorry to bust your bubble of delusion, but this is precisely what our Constitutional Republic is all about.

Those millions of voters you're so worried about? Guess what, they also vote for their State Representatives and Senators, as well as their Federal Representatives and Senators.

So, neither of the alternate Constitutional paths - throwing the appointment of electors to the respective State Legislatures, or throwing the entire election to Congress - disenfranchises anyone, it is simply an alternate path, outlined in our Constitutions (Federal and State).

originally posted by: Lumenari
I'm just going by what my wife said.

I asked her because for many years she was a Judge.

She says that (as an unwritten rule) the votes of four Justices are needed to grant certiorari and bring a case before the Court for decision on the merits.

It is then given a docket number.

all petitions filed to the court get docketed this way those that arent accepted can indicated as being denied.

originally posted by: johnnylaw16
We have seen state vs. state cases before the Court before. What we do not usually see are lawsuits so clearly without merit brought to the court, and there is a reason for that--most parties will not waste the money filing such frivolous claims. This case has no chance--Anyone with any experience or knowledge of Supreme Court legal practice could tell you the same.

Yeah, except... this case is chock full of 'merit'.

But by all means, enlighten us oh great one, why, exactly, this case is without merit.

I look forward to eviscerating your meritless pronouncements with glee.

originally posted by: highvein
Why did the SCOTUS vote 6-3 to hear the case then?

Where did they do this?

It would be very beneficial if people would stop spreading false information.

a reply to: dragonridr

By invalidating illegal votes?

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: johnnylaw16

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The Texas case is it. Will the Supreme Court take action? They will be under extreme political pressure. Under pressure from the media. All they have to decide is......... Did these rogue States violate the electors clause? If they did...... What is the remedy? And the remedy is, It goes to the House to vote by delegation. And if the Supreme Court directs that. Trump wins the election. End of story.

If the Supreme Court fails to act. The States can also do all this on their own, without them.

Constitutional Lawyer Reveals Trump's Killshot to Defeat Voter Fraud

This suit has a zero percent chance of success. End of story.

Sweet I’m glad we got a lawyer with intimate knowledge of this thing!

Now that Trump's idiot lawyers have allowed his malignant narcissism to kill the suit by giving in to his need to micromanage everything, the chance of success is less than zero. To file a lawsuit in a court, you must do so in a court that has subject matter, or original jurisdiction. For example, you can't file a divorce case in small claims court. You can't file a suit seeking equitable relief, like an injunction, or mandamus, in a bottom tier District or County court. The Constitution gives original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in only 2 limited types of cases. The first is cases that involve one state suing another. The Supreme Court is the only forum for these suits since to file a suit you either need to be a resident of a state or be sueing a resident of a state. States are not residents of themselves. So SCOTUS gas both original and exclusive jurisdiction of these cases. Donnie Death apparently can't stand to let anyone else take credit for anything so he found a nutburger lawyer to file a motion to intervene (to join in) the Texas proceeding. Be careful what you ask for Donnie. You might just get it. and if you do, it kills SCOTUS's original jurisdiction. It is no longer just a case between states. A resident of a state has jumped in, so the case can be heard in any number of courts. And what was filed in the Supreme Court was not a suit, it was a request by Paxton to the Court asking for permission to file something. Trump and his malpracticing legal team have just given the Court the perfect rationale for doing the same thing that they unanimously did with the Pennsylvania appeal. He should have gotten something in writing from his SCOTUS appointees. Even Amy Coney Barrett ignored his interests in the Pa case. Supreme Court Justices care about their legacies, too. Except, maybe Clarence Thomas.

originally posted by: johnnylaw16

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
The Texas case is it. Will the Supreme Court take action? They will be under extreme political pressure. Under pressure from the media. All they have to decide is......... Did these rogue States violate the electors clause? If they did...... What is the remedy? And the remedy is, It goes to the House to vote by delegation. And if the Supreme Court directs that. Trump wins the election. End of story.

If the Supreme Court fails to act. The States can also do all this on their own, without them.

Constitutional Lawyer Reveals Trump's Killshot to Defeat Voter Fraud

This suit has a zero percent chance of success. End of story.

It would be absolutely hilarious if it does succeed 🤣 😂 your reputation on this board would be sitting at just that....zero. Not that it is far from it now.

a reply to: Aallanon

By invalidating illegal votes?

No. That's fine.

It's the legal ones being invalidated that are the problem.

In a way, it would be like an innocent man being executed. But not as final.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Aallanon

By invalidating illegal votes?

No. That's fine.

It's the legal ones being invalidated that are the problem.

In a way, it would be like an innocent man being executed. But not as final.

Not a single person on the right has called for a single (or many) LEGAL votes to be invalidated. Only illegal ones. You support that right?

I already know you don't.

So far there hasn't been any Biden fan who supports only LEGAL votes being counted.

Quite telling isn't it.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Not a single person on the right has called for a single (or many) LEGAL votes to be invalidated

The Texas suit calls for the certified vote to be overturned and the state legislatures appoint electors. That invalidates every presidential vote in the state.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Not a single person on the right has called for a single (or many) LEGAL votes to be invalidated

The Texas suit calls for the certified vote to be overturned and the state legislatures appoint electors. That invalidates every vote in the state.

Certified doesn't mean legal, especially when they are counting the votes that violated their own constitution, but you knew that. Stop lying. Be honest for once. Everyone on this site is smart enough to know when you are dishonest.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Texas has called for every vote in the defendant states to be ignored.

Not a single person on the right has called for a single (or many) LEGAL votes to be invalidated.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Texas has called for every vote in the defendant states to be ignored.

Not a single person on the right has called for a single (or many) LEGAL votes to be invalidated.

Arent the votes invalidated by cheaters as well? Whats the difference?

If the SCOTUS comes to believe the election was stolen, you really think they will do nothing? Are we even a Republic at that point?

a reply to: 111DPKING111

Arent the votes invalidated by cheaters as well? Whats the difference?

Just as many cheated as who didn't? More cheated than didn't?
Is that your theory?

Sophomoric. I didn't win so that means you cheated.

Prove it. Or go away. That's what the courts have said and will say.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: 111DPKING111

Arent the votes invalidated by cheaters as well? Whats the difference?

Just as many cheated as who didn't? More cheated than didn't?
Is that your theory?

Sophomoric. I didn't win so that means you cheated.

Prove it. Or go away. That's what the courts have said and will say.

Yes, it would be nice if those states did a full audit to put this to rest... Hard to prove with your head in the sand.

So if the SCOTUS believes cheating has been proven, you think they will do nothing?

a reply to: 111DPKING111

Yes, it would be nice if those states did a full audit to put this to rest

They have. Georgia, three times now?

So if the SCOTUS believes cheating has been proven, you think they will do nothing?

Has any new evidence been presented by Texas? Anything that hasn't been shot down several times already?

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: johnnylaw16

Why did the SCOTUS vote 6-3 to hear the case then? Why waste everyone's time if they will not take it seriously?

It's called due process.

Will the killshot get here before or after the Kraken?

What happens if it accidentally hits the Kraken?

a reply to: Lumenari Johnnylaw is
a fraud.

originally posted by: dragonridr
The supreme court is not going to invalidate millions of votes, If they did that would vioate everything this country stands for. This would totally destroy democracy in this country and we would just be moving to dictatorship.

Validating votes that the U.S Constitution, and the constitution of those states say are illegal is what would violate everything this country stands for...

BTW, & again, this country is a Constitutional and representative REPUBLIC...

Article IV
...
Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
...

constitution.congress.gov...

Those of you who want those "millions of ballots counted" are all a bunch of "pro-crime/pro-criminals." You are welcomed to pick all your bags and leaving for China. After all your palls in the former democrat party, alongside Biden all work for "China." You will love it there. Need help packing?