Kyle Rittenhouse released after posting $2 million bail

I think the kid should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and a medal of bravery. And told to do it again if under similar circumstances. The only reason I wouldn't do it my self is because I know these brainwashed morons set criminals free and lock up anyone brave enough to fight back against tyranny.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

You are a sick person who is advocating killing others.

The teenager did not bring a rifle with him to protect businesses, he brought it with with the intent of using it.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Doctor Smith

You are a sick person who is advocating killing others.

The teenager did not bring a rifle with him to protect businesses, he brought it with with the intent of using it.

They tried to kill him. They were vandalizing and comitting arson. Does he have a defense fund we can donate $ to? The cops didn't protect the properties so it's their fault. I'm glad he shot those criminals dead. You're nuts. You're sick.

Their kind burned down forest land murdering hundreds of citizens. Biden the fraud cheat blamed it on Global Warming.

a reply to: Doctor Smith


Yes you can donate but you better hurry many of his attys have withdrawn from the case. One is being accused of stealing funds donated to his defense since his lawfirm is in trouble. Things are not looking good for the murderer as even the charges he tried to have dissmissed the judge denied saying there is sufficient evidence to stand trial. That not a good sign that means the judge thinks evidence supports him going to jail.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Doctor Smith

You are a sick person who is advocating killing others.

The teenager did not bring a rifle with him to protect businesses, he brought it with with the intent of using it.

You are sick to defend a convicted pedophile and two convicted wife beaters and wish harm/death upon a child. Poor lad would have been tortured and torn apart if that crowd of lowlifes got him.

At least the chomo is in hell where he belongs now.

Truly shocking the depths the new left will not fall to.

originally posted by: jrod
You are a sick person who is advocating killing others.

The teenager did not bring a rifle with him to protect businesses, he brought it with with the intent of using it.

Let me ask you this, did Jacob Blake, the rapist piece of crap that started the Kenosha Wisconsin riot fiasco to begin with, have a knife in his hand while he attempted to flee the police and get to his car with kids inside because he intended to follow the law? Or did he grab the knife out of the car and try to escape from the cops with the intent of escaping the law at any cost?

The knee bone is connected to the thigh bone is connected to the hip bone, man. Each and every one of these situations involving alleged human beings behaving like animals under the bull# excuse of "we're being oppressed because we're expected to behave ourselves the same as everyone else and expected to show personal responsibility and self control!" was precipitated by one or more antisocial pieces of crap with extensive criminal backgrounds that included violent crimes as well as sexual assaults deciding that should be exempt from lawful consequences from their own piss poor decisions. Who exactly has a disdain for life here? The folks recognizing that once an animal has bitten without cause it must be put down or it will bite again, or those who believe anyone who doesn't stand there and get beat on by one of these creatures is exhibiting hatred?

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
I think the kid should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize and a medal of bravery. And told to do it again if under similar circumstances. The only reason I wouldn't do it my self is because I know these brainwashed morons set criminals free and lock up anyone brave enough to fight back against tyranny.

Nobel Peace Prize?, really he hasnt killed nowhere near enough people to be eligible for that???.

Kid should be in jail, but I guess that the doc knows best?.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

What does this have to do with a boy murdering two people ? I really dont care what you think of the people he shot he didnt choose them because they were bad guys. He had no idea what they had done in the past what he did know is he killed someone then didnt stop there nooooo he had to kill someone else all because he thought he was a big man with a gun. All this showed is he was not ready to have a firearm and his inexperience cost him his life as well as the life of two other people. No matter how you look at it he committed murder since he shouldnt even have been there much less with a gun this falls squarely on him and his parents.


I cant believe people here are actually defending his actions its not ok to go out on the street and kill people! And if you were in jail and released doesnt give someone the right to murder you. This boy has serious mental issues even now he shows no remorse. It shows me it was never about helping others he just wanted to feel important it was entirely about his ego.

Im done talking about this kid he is going to prison and will for the rest of his life which is probably a good thing since he has little regard for others.

originally posted by: dragonridr
I really dont care what you think of the people he shot he didnt choose them because they were bad guys.

He "chose" them because they were attempting to assault him. Play stupid games, bleed out in the street for it... no great loss whatsoever. (Likely a net gain, in fact considering none of the *ahem* "victims" here will be even remotely missed by society.)

ETA: Rittenhouse's actions did not and will not cost him his life. Watch the jury slap him with a misdemeanor and find him not guilty on all other charges.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

No one has been able to state how the WI law will rule.

A boy shot someone in the head. It is yet to be determined if it was in self defense. Either way, the boy was committing two crimes when he did it by carrying illegally and being out after curfew. So, does the law allow for self defense while committing a crime?

How will the law rule a situation where a witness sees someone shoot someone in the head and flees. The witness then tries to detain the shooter. The shooter again shoots someone. Another witness tries to detain him after seeing that shooting and the shooter again flees. The shooter then has his mom drive him home to bed instead of the police department to report the incident.

As much as you would like it to be, it does not appear to be an open and shut case. He is being charged with multiple felonies.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: dragonridr
I really dont care what you think of the people he shot he didnt choose them because they were bad guys.

He "chose" them because they were attempting to assault him. Play stupid games, bleed out in the street for it... no great loss whatsoever. (Likely a net gain, in fact considering none of the *ahem* "victims" here will be even remotely missed by society.)

ETA: Rittenhouse's actions did not and will not cost him his life. Watch the jury slap him with a misdemeanor and find him not guilty on all other charges.

Sad the heros you choose to hype. First lets get a couple of facts straight the one guy had an underage girlfriend she was 17 Rosenbaum was found guilty of engaging in “sexual conduct with a minor” in Arizona’s Pima County in March 2002. he recieved 15 years probation. no jail time. So we have him making a bad choice on girlfriends but yu think he deserves to die,

Then in December 2012, And per that complaint, Huber, who was 18 years old at the time, threatened his brother and grandmother at their home with a knife, choked the brother, and demanded that they follow his orders. The complaint said the brother wanted to take Huber to a hospital, apparently for emergency mental health help, but Huber resisted. In the end, he was charged with strangulation and suffocation and false imprisonment, both of which are felony crimes.

So here his brother was trying to force him to go to the hospital and a fight insued. Charges were dropped and apparently he entered rehab for a drug addiction. again he deserves to die according to you.

And our third victim paralyzed for life Grosskreutz recoed consisted of some speeding tickets so according to you he deserves to be a paraplegic. I think its really discusting that you attack dead people to side with a murderer. Oh and just so you know one artcle i read speculated the woman Rosenbaum was engaged to was the underage girl at the time. the artice did say they could not confirm this however. So he left behind his fiancee and a kid all because he went to a protest.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: dragonridr
I really dont care what you think of the people he shot he didnt choose them because they were bad guys.

He "chose" them because they were attempting to assault him. Play stupid games, bleed out in the street for it... no great loss whatsoever. (Likely a net gain, in fact considering none of the *ahem* "victims" here will be even remotely missed by society.)

ETA: Rittenhouse's actions did not and will not cost him his life. Watch the jury slap him with a misdemeanor and find him not guilty on all other charges.

Sad the heros you choose to hype. First lets get a couple of facts straight the one guy had an underage girlfriend she was 17 Rosenbaum was found guilty of engaging in “sexual conduct with a minor” in Arizona’s Pima County in March 2002. he recieved 15 years probation. no jail time. So we have him making a bad choice on girlfriends but yu think he deserves to die,

Then in December 2012, And per that complaint, Huber, who was 18 years old at the time, threatened his brother and grandmother at their home with a knife, choked the brother, and demanded that they follow his orders. The complaint said the brother wanted to take Huber to a hospital, apparently for emergency mental health help, but Huber resisted. In the end, he was charged with strangulation and suffocation and false imprisonment, both of which are felony crimes.

So here his brother was trying to force him to go to the hospital and a fight insued. Charges were dropped and apparently he entered rehab for a drug addiction. again he deserves to die according to you.

And our third victim paralyzed for life Grosskreutz recoed consisted of some speeding tickets so according to you he deserves to be a paraplegic. I think its really discusting that you attack dead people to side with a murderer. Oh and just so you know one artcle i read speculated the woman Rosenbaum was engaged to was the underage girl at the time. the artice did say they could not confirm this however. So he left behind his fiancee and a kid all because he went to a protest.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

You are trying to say someone who was aiming his rifle at people was the victim.

He will face jail time.

Trying to attack the character of those he shot just shows how desperate you are to justify the teenager commiting murder.

originally posted by: jrod

You are trying to say someone who was aiming his rifle at people was the victim.

He will face jail time.

Trying to attack the character of those he shot just shows how desperate you are to justify the teenager commiting murder.

Well no he will not.... 2 guys chasing him down have hard criminals records, the first guy I think just got out of jail not too long before. He was fleeing they were chasing, period. When the first guy caught up to him attacked him and tried to grab his gun that is well past calling it "in defense". The second came at him while he was on the ground still trying to get away from them and the third pulled his own gun and wished he was able to shoot him first.

Your reality is so messed up its scary...

a reply to: dragonridr

And our third victim paralyzed for life Grosskreutz recoed consisted of some speeding tickets so according to you he deserves to be a paraplegic.

You have Grosskreutz mixed up with Jacob Blake.

a reply to: Xtrozero
You are not gonna convince them. They are the party of criminals or something, they riot every time one of the vermin get exterminated. Last dumbass they rioted over was caught on camera pointing a gun at cops FFS. They expect the good guys to just die, not fight back, and especially not win the fight.

a reply to: frogs453

Attacking someone with a skateboard after that person defended themselves from an attack from another individual is a damn funny way of describing "attempting to detain."

Also, if we want to be all legalese and crap, the prosecution's entire argument hinges on "it wasn't Rittenhouse's duty to defend private property." OK, it wasn't the 2nd and 3rd attacker Rittenhouse shots' duty to detain Rittenhouse in any way. Seems like a decent lawyer can easily flip the tables on the prosecution in that regard, ya?

a reply to: dragonridr

Did I call him a hero? There are no heroes, man. There are predators, survivors, and victims.., that's it. Get your head out of this convoluted fantasy world of yours. Decisions have consequences... animals riot, animals meet resistance, resistance often is a permanent resolution to said animal's behaviors.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: burdman30ott6

You are trying to say someone who was aiming his rifle at people was the victim.

He will face jail time.

Trying to attack the character of those he shot just shows how desperate you are to justify the teenager commiting murder.

The character of those shot was apparent based on what they were doing. Good people don't burn and loot businesses. Good people don't give a rat's ass when some walking lifetime failure perishes because his neck was introduced to a knee for a bit too long in response to said failures inability to follow society's laws. Good people sometimes STFU and walk on by when logical consequences befall illogical nobodies.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

Did I call him a hero? There are no heroes, man. There are predators, survivors, and victims.., that's it. Get your head out of this convoluted fantasy world of yours. Decisions have consequences... animals riot, animals meet resistance, resistance often is a permanent resolution to said animal's behaviors.

The other big difference was Rittenhouse didn't go there to cause mayhem and riot, and those that chased him down and attacked him did. There was intent on their part and none on his.