It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: rickymouse
If the media read the evidence than they could no longer say there was no evidence. See, at that point they would be lying and then they are legally in trouble if they lie. So, avoiding to look at evidence allows them to keep publishing fake news.
What about the Republican judges in the Lower and Supreme Courts who have reviewed the evidence and thrown the cases out? What do you have to say about them?
originally posted by: Annee
If you have no real, honest, legitimate answer, make an excuse.
We’ve been seeing a lot of that in regards to factual evidence and judgment.
originally posted by: djz3ro
a reply to: interupt42
You're not wrong there.
I only made that comment because the poster, last week, was salivating at the thought of this going before the Supreme Court.
Both sides are deep in the corruption.
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: rickymouse
If the media read the evidence than they could no longer say there was no evidence. See, at that point they would be lying and then they are legally in trouble if they lie. So, avoiding to look at evidence allows them to keep publishing fake news.
What about the Republican judges in the Lower and Supreme Courts who have reviewed the evidence and thrown the cases out? What do you have to say about them?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: neoholographic
The CIA-FBI-DOJ-Military are all involved. They just operate differently than private attorneys.
originally posted by: yuppa
Trump has only 3-5 cases themselves. why do you guys keep including the private stuff others are filing,because those are the 20-30 that have been tossed.
originally posted by: carewemust
TODAY 11.21.2020
Attorney Lin Wood verifies some of what the Trump legal team will be presenting to the courts.
twitter.com...
Attorney Sydney Powell affirms to Fox News that the evidence is sufficient to hand the election WIN to President Trump.
twitter.com...
The U.S. Supreme Court has positioned itself to receive the evidence, after a lower court rejection.
twitter.com...
Joe Biden had better enjoy playing "President Elect" while he can.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: rickymouse
If the media read the evidence than they could no longer say there was no evidence. See, at that point they would be lying and then they are legally in trouble if they lie. So, avoiding to look at evidence allows them to keep publishing fake news.
What about the Republican judges in the Lower and Supreme Courts who have reviewed the evidence and thrown the cases out? What do you have to say about them?
If Biden had lost with the same margins as Trump, he would be challenging the election and bringing it to court. That is what happens in elections. In hilary's case, she clearly lost a lot of the electoral college, but she even said for biden not to concede if he lost, I am one hundred percent confident that Biden would have challenged the election if the shoe was on the other foot..
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: carewemust
TODAY 11.21.2020
Attorney Lin Wood verifies some of what the Trump legal team will be presenting to the courts.
twitter.com...
Attorney Sydney Powell affirms to Fox News that the evidence is sufficient to hand the election WIN to President Trump.
twitter.com...
The U.S. Supreme Court has positioned itself to receive the evidence, after a lower court rejection.
twitter.com...
Joe Biden had better enjoy playing "President Elect" while he can.
You and I are on the same side, but I don't think they have it... It better be BIG and I mean REALLY REALLY BIG to make a difference, and it better happen sooner than later....
originally posted by: djz3ro
He's doing this because he's arrogant and narcissistic.
He is pushing every button in hopes that one will save his presidency.
As president he is offered protection against lawsuits and debts,
if you watched the press conference, you would find out that they only showed one particular affidavit signed under penalty of perjury because the individual gave her permission, the rest are protected due to the fact that hateful people will harass, dox, intimidate or other.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: neoholographic
He has an Affidavit from a Democrat who says she was ordered by her Elections Supervisor to backdate ballots to make them legal votes.
You have Affidavits from 4 people who saw a truck load of ballots in garbage bags and trash cans pull uo to where they were counting votes at around the time they paused the vote.
Any idea where those affidavits are posted? I have read over 300 pages of affidavits with no statements like that. Do you know which state and county they are from?
originally posted by: rowdyrich
I would like to see Trump win but at this point, I just really want the election crap fixed so the American population doesn't have to worry about our votes counting.
originally posted by: neoholographic
I think the fraud is obvious but the Trump legal team has a problem. This is evidence to trigger an investigation then go to Court. This is why people keep asking, where's the F.B.I.?
Trump made a huge mistake appointing Wray at the F.B.I. and Haspel at the C.I.A. Trump let's these Deep State actors flatter him and then appoints them. Someone like Trey Gowdy should have been appointed to lead the F.B.I.
Rudy said in the press conference they have 1,000 Affidavits. THAT'S EVIDENCE!
He has an Affidavit from a Democrat who says she was ordered by her Elections Supervisor to backdate ballots to make them legal votes.
You have Affidavits from 4 people who saw a truck load of ballots in garbage bags and trash cans pull uo to where they were counting votes at around the time they paused the vote.
I bet none of the media that keeps asking for evidence has read any of these Affidavits.
Now, they spent 3 years telling us a Dossier is evidence that Trump colluded with Russia. This same Dossier was used as evidence to use FISA to spy on Americans but 1,000 Affidavits from American Citizens isn't evidence?
It's just nuts. Remember when the F.B.I. did an investigation of Christine Ford's allegations against Brett Kavanaugh? That was basically one Affidavit that triggered media hysteria, added hearings and an F.B.I. investigation.
Brett Kavanaugh and the FBI report on allegations against him: Here's what we know now
www.usatoday.com...
Again, AN ACCUSSATION AND AFFIDAVIT BY ONE WOMAN TRIGGERED AN F.B.I. Investigation but 1,000 Affidavits about fraud in the election doesn't? A Dossier filled with Russia propaganda is evidence to trigger media hysteria and spying on Americans but 1,000 Affidavits isn't evidence?
The fact is, there's OVERWHELMING evidence that should trigger a 2-3 week F.B.I. Investigation then after the investigation the D.O.J. will decide to go to the Courts.
Trump's legal team is being asked to not only find the evidence to trigger an investigation, then do an investigation without F.B.I. resources and then present this to the Court. It's just sad and asinine when you see what's happening.
Most fraud investigations are triggered by statistical anomalies and there's a bunch of them here. Here's an example of the evidence that should trigger an investigation.
You have Affidavits from 4 people who saw a truck load of ballots pull into where they were counting votes around the time they stopped the vote.
You have Sydney Powell with Affidavits from people who worked with Dominion that identify the algorithm they use. It's an algorith that counts Biden votes as 1.25 and Trumps votes as. .75 or .8. It's like giving the house an advantage in a Casino.
This is why Trump and the down ballot Republican started out on the same strong trajectory and just Trump had a sharp downward trajectory and not down ballot Republicans.
Does it make any sense when Trump is so popular with Republicans that he wouldn't track with down ballot Republicans? Does it make any sense that Biden had 450,000 Biden only votes and Democrats just felt so gracious they gave the Senate bac to Republicans and weakened Pelosi in the House?
What may have happened is the algorithm wasn't enough like Sydney Powell said. Trump was up by 700,000 votes in some places and the Algorithm didn't have enough Biden votes to overcome this. They needed more Biden votes.
So they stop counting and truck loads of Ballots appear that's attested to by a signed Affidavit from 4 American citizens.
They then have to mark a bunch of Biden ballots to get into the machine and they don't have time to mark down ballot Democrats. This is why Biden has more Biden only votes than any Presidential election in history.
This is just one thing they presented as EVIDENCE!
This should be more than enough to trigger a 2-3 week F.B.I. investigation. Sadly this will not happen because of Christopher Wray and Deep State Globalist who hate Trump.
We know if the same set of facts occurred and you switch Biden and Trump, the media would be hysterical. They went crazy over 1 affidavit imagine what they would do with 1,000 Affidavits saying fraud happened to help Trump and hurt Biden. If things were reversed, Wray would say there needs to be an investigation.
Like I said, the Trump team is in a tough spot. They have OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE to trigger an investigation but they're being asked to find evidence of fraud, which they have, then investigate that evidence and then present it in Court in a few weeks.