It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
When you factor in the inevitable deaths that will skyrocket from lack of preventative care this year, it's a #ing wash and you know it. We killed some later, to save some now. That's not a win, that's being deliberately retarded.
People aren't going to catch a pathogen that isn't replicating among the populace. You are acting like 'flu is an inevitability and has nothing to do with disease transmission.
We can beat this one, too!
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
I don't think you understand this at all.
The Southern Hemisphere had a very light flu season in 2020, with Australia seeing only 315 cases over its winter, down 99.8% from the 130,000 cases seen in most years. But flu experts say that, while the low numbers could portend a similar scenario in the Northern Hemisphere, it would be a foolhardy not to prepare for high caseloads this winter.
You are honestly going to say that by following the guidelines, that aren't followed by everyone, the rate dropped 99.8%.
Read that back to yourself. Now tell me again.
If 'flu requires very close and repeated contact between humans to transmit, then a slight change in social practices could be an absolute block to the transmission of 'flu, and we'd have never known it.
The fact that we've never thought to do this social distancing and other stuff on the scale of entire communities, and yet here is the evidence that it works incredibly well, should inform you that it can do what it is obviously doing.
Otherwise, you have to make up some other weird and 'way-out-there theory' to explain what is evident.
99.8. Even the really, really stupid kids are laughing at your pathetic attempt to back this up.
99.8. Testing is garbage, and if you sneeze, you got the vid. Make the numbers as high as possible for dramatic effect.
Jesus Christ, you should be embarrassed to even be here. 99.8.......Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Testing, of itself, doesn't stop disease transmission.
Clearly, the USA has lots of testing per capita, but the disease ravages on.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
I don't think you understand this at all.
The Southern Hemisphere had a very light flu season in 2020, with Australia seeing only 315 cases over its winter, down 99.8% from the 130,000 cases seen in most years. But flu experts say that, while the low numbers could portend a similar scenario in the Northern Hemisphere, it would be a foolhardy not to prepare for high caseloads this winter.
You are honestly going to say that by following the guidelines, that aren't followed by everyone, the rate dropped 99.8%.
Read that back to yourself. Now tell me again.
If 'flu requires very close and repeated contact between humans to transmit, then a slight change in social practices could be an absolute block to the transmission of 'flu, and we'd have never known it.
The fact that we've never thought to do this social distancing and other stuff on the scale of entire communities, and yet here is the evidence that it works incredibly well, should inform you that it can do what it is obviously doing.
Otherwise, you have to make up some other weird and 'way-out-there theory' to explain what is evident.
99.8. Even the really, really stupid kids are laughing at your pathetic attempt to back this up.
99.8. Testing is garbage, and if you sneeze, you got the vid. Make the numbers as high as possible for dramatic effect.
Jesus Christ, you should be embarrassed to even be here. 99.8.......Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Testing, of itself, doesn't stop disease transmission.
Clearly, the USA has lots of testing per capita, but the disease ravages on.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
I don't think you understand this at all.
The Southern Hemisphere had a very light flu season in 2020, with Australia seeing only 315 cases over its winter, down 99.8% from the 130,000 cases seen in most years. But flu experts say that, while the low numbers could portend a similar scenario in the Northern Hemisphere, it would be a foolhardy not to prepare for high caseloads this winter.
You are honestly going to say that by following the guidelines, that aren't followed by everyone, the rate dropped 99.8%.
Read that back to yourself. Now tell me again.
If 'flu requires very close and repeated contact between humans to transmit, then a slight change in social practices could be an absolute block to the transmission of 'flu, and we'd have never known it.
The fact that we've never thought to do this social distancing and other stuff on the scale of entire communities, and yet here is the evidence that it works incredibly well, should inform you that it can do what it is obviously doing.
Otherwise, you have to make up some other weird and 'way-out-there theory' to explain what is evident.
99.8. Even the really, really stupid kids are laughing at your pathetic attempt to back this up.
99.8. Testing is garbage, and if you sneeze, you got the vid. Make the numbers as high as possible for dramatic effect.
Jesus Christ, you should be embarrassed to even be here. 99.8.......Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Testing, of itself, doesn't stop disease transmission.
Clearly, the USA has lots of testing per capita, but the disease ravages on.
Kind of amazing how it's still ravaging on in places with strict restrictions, isn't it? I mean, by all accounts, Italy should have licked it playing Solitary Confinement, but it's in fact biting them in the ass.
IMO, they're the prime case study for why the lockdowns & distancing as a preventative measure are complete and utter bunk.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
When you factor in the inevitable deaths that will skyrocket from lack of preventative care this year, it's a #ing wash and you know it. We killed some later, to save some now. That's not a win, that's being deliberately retarded.
People aren't going to catch a pathogen that isn't replicating among the populace. You are acting like 'flu is an inevitability and has nothing to do with disease transmission.
We can beat this one, too!
It is an inevitability, just like a seasonal cold is.
Hiding from them doesn't make them go away, they just wait for you to feel "safe" enough to whoop your ass. And the lack of any immune system practice this year thanks to this # is going to be an Achilles Heel.
The intentions might have been good, but they were shortsighted, ill-considered, and still lead to hell.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: trollz
Lockdowns, social distancing, hand washing, PPE, quarantines &, etc. are all effective against 'flu, just like with COVID-19.
This is why, where these have been effective against COVID-19, they have been effective against influenza.
I don't think you understand this at all.
The Southern Hemisphere had a very light flu season in 2020, with Australia seeing only 315 cases over its winter, down 99.8% from the 130,000 cases seen in most years. But flu experts say that, while the low numbers could portend a similar scenario in the Northern Hemisphere, it would be a foolhardy not to prepare for high caseloads this winter.
You are honestly going to say that by following the guidelines, that aren't followed by everyone, the rate dropped 99.8%.
Read that back to yourself. Now tell me again.
If 'flu requires very close and repeated contact between humans to transmit, then a slight change in social practices could be an absolute block to the transmission of 'flu, and we'd have never known it.
The fact that we've never thought to do this social distancing and other stuff on the scale of entire communities, and yet here is the evidence that it works incredibly well, should inform you that it can do what it is obviously doing.
Otherwise, you have to make up some other weird and 'way-out-there theory' to explain what is evident.
99.8. Even the really, really stupid kids are laughing at your pathetic attempt to back this up.
99.8. Testing is garbage, and if you sneeze, you got the vid. Make the numbers as high as possible for dramatic effect.
Jesus Christ, you should be embarrassed to even be here. 99.8.......Bwahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Testing, of itself, doesn't stop disease transmission.
Clearly, the USA has lots of testing per capita, but the disease ravages on.
I have to run. I have a Twinkie I'm going to slice up and solve world hunger. Everyone get some. I can feed, what, 99.8% of the world?
You jumped the shark boss. Take a shower and call it.
Oh look, the flu has mysteriously vanished worldwide
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Heard an interesting theory from a doctor on talk radio.
All the increase in cases are easily perdictable when it gets real cold most people go inside, when it gets real hot most people go inside.
Most homes and buisnesses dont keep the best alergen filters on their air systems so you probably have dirty and ineffective air filters, your indoors and its recycled air.
Of course cases will go up.
originally posted by: Liquesence
Oh look, the flu has mysteriously vanished worldwide
Except it hasn't.
*Regular* flu season is just beginning.
Covid is now spiking in select areas worldwide.
President Trump, a congressman and conspiracy fantasists have repeated the myth. But three kinds of evidence point to more than 218,000 U.S. deaths
During the 2019-2020 influenza season, CDC estimates that influenza was associated with 38 million illnesses, 18 million medical visits, 405,000 hospitalizations, and 22,000 deaths.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its pretty difficult to diagnose flu as Covid, the tests are looking for different viruses.
Now I personally would like to see the WHO source rather than RT.
You would expect lower flu rates this year, social distancing and masks is going to drop flu rates and governments around the world are ramping up immunisation so I would expect a significantly lower prevalence of flu
But yet the original virus is supposedly spreading like wildfire? Does that make any sense to you? You can't have it both ways.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Its pretty difficult to diagnose flu as Covid, the tests are looking for different viruses.
Now I personally would like to see the WHO source rather than RT.
You would expect lower flu rates this year, social distancing and masks is going to drop flu rates and governments around the world are ramping up immunisation so I would expect a significantly lower prevalence of flu