Scotland - Coronavirus - 5 deaths in a week

a reply to: Grenade

Its not patronising its just a little hypocritical of you to on the one hand call it a "government mouthpiece" and then on another use BBC to support your argument that's all.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

To clarify, when having a debate it’s difficult to counter if you use a source the other person relies on.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

I was asked for my reasoning as to why the pandemic was engineered. Unlike you I provided that opinion and sources to back it.

And I have pointed out your sources don't remotely back up your claims.

Showing planning for a post pandemic works is not even close to evidence that the pandemic was planned.

a reply to: ScepticScot

*yawn

Re-wording and rehashing the exact same thing over and over is really boring pal. Please try and bring something to the table which refutes my argument other than massaging your own world view.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

All of them. Are the case numbers rising in Sweden?

Do you think the virus spreads completely uniformly and simultaneously everywhere?

Sweden has the 5th highest deaths per capita in the world. The Swedish approach may be shown to be correct but the evidence so far suggests otherwise.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

*yawn

Re-wording and rehashing the exact same thing over and over is really boring pal. Please try and bring something to the table which refutes my argument other than massaging your own world view.

I have shown your argument is evidence free.

Do you expect me to show evidence of an absence of conspiracy?

a reply to: ScepticScot

Really? All I’ve seen are your opinions, the same one you post in every thread regardless of the subject matter.

You’re just down right rude, you offer nothing to this thread other than self indulgent criticism of views your unwilling to even give consideration.

a reply to: Grenade

I must say, I agree with you that the newest restrictions are utter bollocks but really, you are absolutely awful at debating and arguing your case...

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

You’re entitled to that opinion. Anything in particular I’ve said you take issue with or just blanket criticism without substance?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

Really? All I’ve seen are your opinions, the same one you post in every thread regardless of the subject matter.

You’re just down right rude, you offer nothing to this thread other than self indulgent criticism of views your unwilling to even give consideration.

You are making outlandish claims and providing no supporting evidence. Even on this site you are going to get called on that.

If you want a forum to air any opinion you want and not be expected to support it or have it criticised then maybe this isn't the site for you.

If you can provide any evidence to back up your claims the please do post it. It would make a far more interesting debate that constantly having to point out that you are making unsupported claims.

a reply to: ScepticScot

My opinion is that the pandemic was either engineered or has been hijacked and inflated in order to bring around The Great Reset as defined by the world economic forum. Supported by leaders of industry and commerce, it’s aims are to initiate the fourth industrial revolution and socialist reforms to national governments. I think I’ve provided ample evidence to suggest some truth to this theory.

If you disagree then fine but please other than insult me at the very least attempt constructive debate that isn’t solely reliant on calling me delusional.

I’ll refrain from further correspondence until you offer something new.

Thanks

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

My opinion is that the pandemic was either engineered or has been hijacked and inflated in order to bring around The Great Reset as defined by the world economic forum. Supported by leaders of industry and commerce, it’s aims are to initiate the fourth industrial revolution and socialist reforms to national governments. I think I’ve provided ample evidence to suggest some truth to this theory.

If you disagree then fine but please other than insult me at the very least attempt constructive debate that isn’t solely reliant on calling me delusional.

I’ll refrain from further correspondence until you offer something new.

Thanks

You are entitled to your opinion however it just an opinion.

For it to have been hijacked or engineered as you state it would have involved millions of people across thousands of organisations. Real world conspiracies just don't work like that.

Spreading lies and wild fantasies about this has real world consequences and you aren't going to be immune from criticism when making evidence free statements.

I don't think either the UK or Scottish government has got everything right however as long as they are basing their actions on the best scientific & expert advice at the time then that is all we can ask.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

its weird though Ive seen the BBC post articles recently Id never thought it read on there

ones that were actually critical of the government

for instance the FIN CEN documents leak and they state that the tories took donations linked to dodgy money

a reply to: ScepticScot

You just described the world economic forum exactly.

The capitalist system can’t be destroyed by votes, the middle classes just don’t want socialism, it’s a movement of the poor. Re-distribution of wealth is on its way, revolution on industry is upon us and my fear is like all other attempts at socialism we will end up equally poor and controlled by authoritarian governance.

Time will tell I guess but in 5 years the virus will be forgotten, the policies and re-structuring of society however will be apparent.

Come back to me then.

a reply to: Grenade

I wonder how many of those companies are named in the list of 3000 UK companies and banks involved in the dirty 2 trillion fin cen documents leak

a reply to: Grenade

Can I please just check something....

My opinion is that the pandemic was either engineered or has been hijacked and inflated in order to bring around The Great Reset as defined by the world economic forum.

Are you aware that your opinion does not constitute fact nor is it in line with the general consensus of the scientific community.

You are totally entitled to hold that view, but it is not a fact. I think this might be the sticking point.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Perfectly aware. It’s a fact that the virus is being used by the World Economic Forum to action its plan as evidenced by the 100’s of companies and institutions backing it and their own rhetoric and propaganda on the subject. Did you watch the video on their homepage?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Perfectly aware. It’s a fact that the virus is being used by the World Economic Forum to action its plan as evidenced by the 100’s of companies and institutions backing it and their own rhetoric and propaganda on the subject. Did you watch the video on their homepage?

They are hardly going to pretend the virus hasn't happened.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Perfectly aware. It’s a fact that the virus is being used by the World Economic Forum to action its plan as evidenced by the 100’s of companies and institutions backing it and their own rhetoric and propaganda on the subject. Did you watch the video on their homepage?

a reply to: Grenade

It’s a fact that the virus is being used by the World Economic Forum to action its plan as evidenced by the 100’s of companies and institutions backing it and their own rhetoric and propaganda on the subject.

Ok this is what I mean, when you state a fact its usually a good idea to support it with some kind of reference to support the argument.

So you kind of need to tell me what that plan actually is, and show the evidence that 100's of companies and institutions are backing the WEF and its "plan" furthermore you need to evidence that it is using Covid to further this. Thats at least three separate "factoids" you need to provide before anyone is going to bother with it.

Also just saying "watch the video" without actually providing any kind of commentary on what its says or your own analysis of it is lazy.

If you're serous about your views on this and what you believe to be facts you kinda need to get better at articulating them.