It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: ketsuko
To a certain extent, it's part of health. You need to know how reproduction works just like you need to know about things like STDs and how to avoid them and pregnancy and its prevention.
Again... NO.
That is the purpose of Dad's (or Moms, or both) 'the birds and the bees' talk.
Again, if you believe that there is a place for sex ed indoctrination, then there is also a place for religious, political, and every other form of indoctrination.
No, schools should teach the 3 R's, and that is it.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Drucifer
Already out there is not an excuse to simply plunge kids into it though.
It's like the race baiting stuff. It's all out there too, but do you want your kids taught about Critical Race Theory from the time they are 6?
originally posted by: Drucifer
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Drucifer
Already out there is not an excuse to simply plunge kids into it though.
It's like the race baiting stuff. It's all out there too, but do you want your kids taught about Critical Race Theory from the time they are 6?
But therein lies the problem, they’re going to get exposed, or plunged into it, regardless. The only way to stop that is to never let your kid leave the house and put all media on lockdown.
While I wouldn’t want my hypothetical kids being taught Critical Race Theory, I’d certainly want them aware of what it was so when it was presented to them they could counter it to the best of their abilities.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Yeah, at six most can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. That isn't anything new. At that age boys think girls have cooties.
But there's a major difference between discussing that and discussing performing oral on someone's butthole.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Yeah, at six most can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. That isn't anything new. At that age boys think girls have cooties.
But there's a major difference between discussing that and discussing performing oral on someone's butthole.
And when exactly does that explanation happen?
Personally — I wish all forms of sex acts had been taught during sex Ed. Thank Zeus for the Internet — that today’s kids have access to full knowledge of what should be natural as a biological being.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Yeah, at six most can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. That isn't anything new. At that age boys think girls have cooties.
But there's a major difference between discussing that and discussing performing oral on someone's butthole.
And when exactly does that explanation happen?
Personally — I wish all forms of sex acts had been taught during sex Ed. Thank Zeus for the Internet — that today’s kids have access to full knowledge of what should be natural as a biological being.
Why?
Do kids really *need* to know every single possible thing two (or more) people can do and can call sexual? I suppose we should teach them how to safely have sex with the family dog too.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Yeah, at six most can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. That isn't anything new. At that age boys think girls have cooties.
But there's a major difference between discussing that and discussing performing oral on someone's butthole.
And when exactly does that explanation happen?
Personally — I wish all forms of sex acts had been taught during sex Ed. Thank Zeus for the Internet — that today’s kids have access to full knowledge of what should be natural as a biological being.
Why?
Do kids really *need* to know every single possible thing two (or more) people can do and can call sexual? I suppose we should teach them how to safely have sex with the family dog too.
Sexual and the act of sex — are not the same thing.
Oh, yeah — bring in the dog. You forgot to bring in the pedo.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Yeah, at six most can tell the difference between a boy and a girl. That isn't anything new. At that age boys think girls have cooties.
But there's a major difference between discussing that and discussing performing oral on someone's butthole.
And when exactly does that explanation happen?
Personally — I wish all forms of sex acts had been taught during sex Ed. Thank Zeus for the Internet — that today’s kids have access to full knowledge of what should be natural as a biological being.
Why?
Do kids really *need* to know every single possible thing two (or more) people can do and can call sexual? I suppose we should teach them how to safely have sex with the family dog too.
Sexual and the act of sex — are not the same thing.
Oh, yeah — bring in the dog. You forgot to bring in the pedo.
You're the one who says you wished you'd been taught about rimjobs.
But this illustrates why it should be the parents' job to teach a lot of this. If you think your 6-year-old needs to be exposed to a rimjob, then that's what you need to teach them about.
I think it's better to wait until puberty and then start with the nuts and bolts and work out from there. The hard core stuff isn't something that needs to be discussed in classrooms unless he goes to college and decides he wants to pay for a class on the topic.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Drucifer
Just being exposed is no need to go full-on to beat the punch though.
Oh, he's going to be exposed to cuss words, so I ought to make sure I use every one I know so he's got them under his belt. He's going to see and hear about sex, so his father and I ought to give him a personal demonstration before someone else tells him about it.
There's a point where it's crazy and does more damage than you're trying to head off.
These are children, not mini-adults, and they process like children. Their brains and reasoning capacities won't be fully developed for years on yet, but lets expose them to stuff they aren't fully ready to reason around.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Annee
Puberty is biology's way of showing your body is ready for some sexual activities.
So puberty would be a good place to begin the discussion, as it has been.
You seem to be suggesting showing little kids hardcore porn so they are up to date on every possible sexual act.
Ludicrous.