40% of Parents Don’t Want LGBT Lessons for 6-Year-Olds, They Must Be ‘Persuaded’

a reply to: filthyphilanthropist

Yeah, I recall the "very special lesson" at school at about that age with the "naughty" film strip everyone giggled through that our parents had to give permission for us to see.

It taught all about those bits and they separated boys and girls, so ours talked about menstruation and stuff. I can only imagine what the boy one talked about.

It goes to show you that lgbtqaaip is satanic and is intent on feeding it's lust for children.

All of these events just peeled back the veil that used to stop at bear and cub and now sits at transgender toddler pole dancing and anal sex.

We should have hung every priest that ever raped a little boy or girl.

a reply to: infolurker


Simple Solution IF you Love your Children Enough . Home Schooling . Pure Minds Deserve to stay that Way Until Adulthood ......

The op... Ummm. All I can say is that this sounds like something that the television show South Park would explore.

Had the same thing happens with my daughter. She was in the school where the lgbtq community was huge. She had many friends in that Community which was great. She moved a couple months ago and is now in therapy because of Suicidal Thoughts because she does not know who she is. Is that part of it? I don't know. What I do know is when she lived in a different location 2 years before it was an non topic. Now her father got relocated and they moved to a rural area. She's now seeing a therapist. That specilizes in working with teens who are part of the lgbtq community. No matter what I will love my child. I understand that adolescence is the time where you discover Who You Are as a person.
I'm all about inclusion at the proper age with parent consent, tactfulness, and dignity. I would also like to note that only sex between a female that was born a female and a male that was born a male are going to create a baby. After that the STD talk. After that The safe-sex Talk.
Inclusion in the classroom is nothing new when it comes to different family situations. Some children in the center where I work has two moms. We have parents that are vastly differing in age. There are books about pretty much any family unit you can imagine. So by the time children get to sex ed they are already familiar with the different type of family units. Hopefully that would make it less difficult for discussion when it is time. In 9th grade or tenth grade.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: projectvxn

originally posted by: vonclod
I'm fairly liberal..but this sh@t is where I draw the damn line!. Am I liberal? I honestly don't know anymore

I don't think any of us really moved politically. But this Brave New World/1984 # has forced people to reevaluate many positions once held as axiomatic.

I hear you, I still tend to believe in the things I do, but some things are being pushed beyond what I see as reasonable accommodation. Mostly I'm a live, let live kinda guy, but 6 year olds..nope.

I have a niece and nephew, the nephew came out as gay, he was about 17, 6 months later the niece too..the nephew, sure, the niece..I don't buy it, not for a minute..lol They have been teaching this stuff in the schools. It became "trendy". Well, I guess she won't get pregnant

a reply to: infolurker

Which, if any, schools follow these requirements? I know our children's public schools certainly do not. If they did, I definitely wouldn't allow it. Is this like a proposal or something?

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Why does Blacks who make up 13% of the population and the LBGT that is maybe 6% drive 99% of the narrative today in just about everything. I'm kind of tired of it all...lol Also watching TV shows one would think 70% of the population was LBGT...

What kind of shows do you watch? Lol. In the TV shows I watch, I think it amounts to maybe 3% at most.

As to why these "groups" drive the narrative, its part because they put the effort in, part because the world-runners who want to divide people support the narratives, and part because people react to it so much. Feed the wolf, and the wolf grows big and strong. We should learn to downplay and ignore idiots.

originally posted by: ketsuko
Any discussion about what they ought to be taught in sex ed, what and when, ought to be reserved for when they're about to become sexual at or around the age of puberty.

Public schools should stick to reading, writing, and arithmetic, civics, and history...

Sex ed - of any kind - has no place being taught in public schools. Leave that to the parents...

Stop electing extemists to power. How about schools who started teaching creationism?

When you give power to extreme left or right.. this happens

a reply to: tanstaafl

I think it has a valid place in highschool.

originally posted by: Nickn3
I wouldn’t want LGBT lessons for my children period.

Agreed 1000000%.

They pull this # with my kids and it’s lawsuit time. And a highly publicized and vocal one at that.

There are some things worth defending. My children’s childhood is one of them. If anyone starts making reference to anal sex, or any other kind of sex, to my seven year old whoever did that is going to have a general # storm on their hands. Zero F’s given by this daddy - a price will be paid.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: ketsuko
Any discussion about what they ought to be taught in sex ed, what and when, ought to be reserved for when they're about to become sexual at or around the age of puberty.

Public schools should stick to reading, writing, and arithmetic, civics, and history...

Sex ed - of any kind - has no place being taught in public schools. Leave that to the parents...

To a certain extent, it's part of health. You need to know how reproduction works just like you need to know about things like STDs and how to avoid them and pregnancy and its prevention.

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: ketsuko
Any discussion about what they ought to be taught in sex ed, what and when, ought to be reserved for when they're about to become sexual at or around the age of puberty.

Public schools should stick to reading, writing, and arithmetic, civics, and history...

Sex ed - of any kind - has no place being taught in public schools. Leave that to the parents...

To a certain extent, it's part of health. You need to know how reproduction works just like you need to know about things like STDs and how to avoid them and pregnancy and its prevention.

True. But not to children who are barely out of kindergarten/are early on in primary school.

originally posted by: EnigmaChaser

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: ketsuko
Any discussion about what they ought to be taught in sex ed, what and when, ought to be reserved for when they're about to become sexual at or around the age of puberty.

Public schools should stick to reading, writing, and arithmetic, civics, and history...

Sex ed - of any kind - has no place being taught in public schools. Leave that to the parents...

To a certain extent, it's part of health. You need to know how reproduction works just like you need to know about things like STDs and how to avoid them and pregnancy and its prevention.

True. But not to children who are barely out of kindergarten/are early on in primary school.

Of course not, I've been consistent on that.

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: tanstaafl

I think it has a valid place in highschool.

General Health instruction... maybe...

Sex Ed? No, Just no. Otherwise, everything else is fair game, from religious to political indoctrination.

Argument in support of my contention?

See what is happening in all public schools, especially colleges, but now apparently all the way down to elementary...

No. Just no.

originally posted by: ketsuko
To a certain extent, it's part of health. You need to know how reproduction works just like you need to know about things like STDs and how to avoid them and pregnancy and its prevention.

Again... NO.

That is the purpose of Dad's (or Moms, or both) 'the birds and the bees' talk.

Again, if you believe that there is a place for sex ed indoctrination, then there is also a place for religious, political, and every other form of indoctrination.

No, schools should teach the 3 R's, and that is it.

Disgusting

Id guess it’s more than 40% of parents aren’t wanting their kindergartners to learn about anal sex, in a classroom or otherwise. But they have a poll!

a reply to: infolurker

originally posted by: Bhadhidar

Keep this person away from your kids.....

Absolutely disgusting, pathetic, creep...

a reply to: tanstaafl

You really cannot teach the endocrine system which includes the gonads without teaching what and how it operates and why.

So the birds and bees is gonna happen. Penis, testes, ovaries, uterus, etc., and their function are a large part of that system and its existence.

Skipping endocrine would be omitting a large part of health class and the human body in general.

I won the state science competition in anatomy and physiology in high school in part because my science and health teachers didn't skip the endocrine so my partner and I were able to recognize major parts of the endocrine specific to male reproductive anatomy. That wasn't the only reason. There were lots of tricky ones, but it was one of the practical models on the test.