a reply to:
mirageman
my comment about the 'UFO cover story' certain applied
to AAWSAP and people like Leslie Kean.
But I was also pointing to 70 years of 'UFoolOlogy';
What with books, movies and then future media
making it sound 'reaosonable in theory' for UFOs
to exist and to visit us,
that's why those with agendas for other 'beliefs'
and 'actions'
started with 'UFOs'.
'UFOs' are a gateway drug/deception.
Now, you and I have a difference in experience,
which has led to a diffeence in observation about
the so called 'paranormal' and that's quite
understanable.
I never 'believed in UFOs' until one showe up in
my face; but then after reserach, it turned out
to not be a 'UFO' at all.
'UFOs are not UFOs' when they are not just
perceptual errors or government deception;
they are something else.
It's like wood ticks. In my home state the little
monsters are everywhere.. they are like monsters
out of fiction; they can crawl and attach themselves
in any crevice in your body and attach; and if
you remove one, it generally rips it's head off
which remains in said crevice.
Many people have never encoutered them,
or their horrors. They are 'not real' for
those people, no matter how much you
might tell stories about them.
now yes, you can photo wood ticks,
but that doesn't communicate the message
if youve never had one..
I semi-wonder if the swr ranch guys did ANY
of the usual research steps.. and I certainly
wonder if even 10% of their reports are not
pure BS.
But I won't just discount the whole thing;
and there are other, far better cases.
But certainly SWR is a 'poisoned source'.
It's not worth visiting.
Kev