It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Uncertain Future of Particle Physics
Ten years in, the Large Hadron Collider has failed to deliver the exciting discoveries that scientists promised.
By Sabine Hossenfelder
Dr. Hossenfelder is a research fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies.
Jan. 23, 2019
www.nytimes.com...
But big science experiments are investments in our future. Decisions about what to fund should be based on facts, not on shiny advertising. For this, we need to know when a prediction is just a guess. And if particle physicists have only guesses, maybe we should wait until they have better reasons for why a larger collider might find something new.
It is correct that some technological developments, like strong magnets, benefit from these particle colliders and that particle physics positively contributes to scientific education in general. These are worthy investments, but if that’s what you want to spend money on, you don’t also need to dig a tunnel
originally posted by: ManFromEurope
originally posted by: SecretKnowledge
Cern: "We need 21 billion to make an even bigger collider, how we gonna sell that to the fools, i mean donors. Lets tell them we've discovered a new particle."
Donors: "21 billion? That could feed a lot of people for a lot of years. Thats a lot of schools we could build"
Cern: "Did we mention its an exotic particle?"
Donors: "Is 21 billion enough???!!!"
As if here would be only 21 billion in the world for this kind of projects.
Or as if this money would, if retracted from CERN, go build some schools, while in reality the money would go absolutely elsewhere. And usually not in a positive direction.
Don't kid yourself. The starvation won't be helped with this small amount of money. The illiterate won't be schooled. It would fill up some already very rich person's bankaccount and nothing else.
Better to use it on science!
originally posted by: neutronflux
20 billion would build lots of solar panel farms and quiet a few desalination plants for fresh water. Or air separation plants to remove CO2 from the atmosphere?
If you haven't yet heard, CERN makes bold push to build €21-billion supercollider, which will dwarf the current 27-kilometer(16 mile) collider with its 100 kilometers (62 miles) of circumference.
originally posted by: alldaylong
originally posted by: neutronflux
20 billion would build lots of solar panel farms and quiet a few desalination plants for fresh water. Or air separation plants to remove CO2 from the atmosphere?
The U.S. spends at present 732 billion on Defense. Most of that is spent on equipment to kill people.
21 billion is a drop in the ocean compared. At least that money can be spent on advancing science.
www.pgpf.org...
The U.S. spends at present 732 billion on Defense. Most of that is spent on equipment to kill people. 21 billion is a drop in the ocean compared. At least that money can be spent on advancing science.
originally posted by: ADAMandEVIL
CERN Discovers Exotic Never Before Seen Particle..........
wow the level of total stupidity on ATS never fails to surprise me.
a reply to: neutronflux
Or air separation plants to remove CO2 from the atmosphere?