Trump emerges from bunker to hold up a Bible outside church in photo op

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Gryphon66

No your just like your antifa terrorist buddies.

You dont come out and say I support the terrorists rioting,'

You go on about how having the government stop them is tyranny and means you are a police state supporter if you disagree

Still no quotes.

You’re starting to sound like a parrot.

Wraack, antifa, Wraack, democrats ....

Please demonstrate even one sentence from me defending “ANTIFA” ... just one. This thread or any other. From any time.

Caution though, you won’t find it on Twitter.

a reply to: Grambler

So says the terrorist.

See, that easy to just make # up.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Grambler



Where is the burned down church? Where are the burned down cities?

And her it is, proof of your dishonestly in attempts to defend your left wing terroirsts friends.

You are right, nothing at all to see.

You are truly impressive of your ability to boldly deny reality in defense of your tleft wing terrorist friends

Don't mind me, just a naive little baby over here learning about shapes and colors.
I thought it was cool. Thought he did it as an act of showing people to be brave and not scared, to be calm, have faith and all that. They sure tricked me. I felt better when I thought it was an innocent act.
Going back to live in my world of cupcakes and snow cones.

a reply to: LSU2018

Nope. If bernie Sanders suddenly started posting bible photos and praying with pastors before a big election i would make fun if it also.

And it doesn't bother me that much. I just like people seeing trump for the phony he is.

originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: Grambler

So says the terrorist.

See, that easy to just make # up.

Except i havent suggested law enforcement stoipping terrrorists from br=runing down cities makes you a police state supporter

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Grambler

Also sounds like what law enforcement is doing to peaceful protesters.

Sure if police act unjustly they should be called out

weird how i can say that, but the anti police crowd has almost nothing to say about the cities being burned

"what cities are being burned down" lol

a reply to: Grambler

Where are the burned down cities?

If there are so many examples, please post.

This is a fact-based forum. You’ve made a claim, a ludicrous exaggerated claim, but still a claim.

I want to see the city that has been burned down. I will accept the church that has been burned down,.

You know, that church we’re discussing here? The one that Trump is standing in front of, yesterday?

C’mon G ... it’s easy. Show us the burned out ruin of the church that Trump IS STANDING IN FRONT OF.

That’s the nominal topic here ... the Bible pic in front of the CHURCH THAT HE’S STANDING IN FRONT OF.

a reply to: Gryphon66

So I guess you quibble with the definition of burned down
'
I get it, we need to defend your left wing terrorists buddies so bad, that we now need to argue that them burning down buildings all over cities all over the country isnt techinically burning the whole city down.

So we will feign ignorance, as you often do, becaiuse you cant be honest and forthwrite with what you really want, the totally capitulation of all people to your left wing terrorist buddies,

the same crowd saying we need protest over systemic racism, who cant even begin to prove the entire system is racist, starts to quibble when we llok at riots on a scale rarely seen in thos country and say its not cities burned down, its cities burning.

Detroit ... Jesus Christ surely Detroit has been leveled, right?

Nope. Vehicle fires, rapidly extinguished.

Clean up underway.

TL; DR - No cities have been burned down. The St. John’s church has not been burned down.

What we do have is a President that is willing to use our own military against American citizens.

What we also have is a group of state terror apologists here DESPERATELY trying to blame it on “ANTIFA” ...

A claim we also have ZERO factual backup for.

Weren't' the police enforcing the 7 PM Curfew at the same time he took his walk. The mayor, who condemned it, is at fault for not having her citizens off the street. Stop with the Trump is gassing his citizens BS.

I have to tell you though with that OP title you might have a guest shot at the WaPo or HuffPo....

originally posted by: matafuchs
Weren't' the police enforcing the 7 PM Curfew at the same time he took his walk. The mayor, who condemned it, is at fault for not having her citizens off the street. Stop with the Trump is gassing his citizens BS.

I have to tell you though with that OP title you might have a guest shot at the WaPo or HuffPo....

Yet, the facts remain, despite all the BS

They watched as police officers and National Guard units flooded Lafayette Square, delivering on a threat made by President Trump. And just before the city’s 7 p.m. curfew went into effect, they were hit with flash-bang explosions and doused with tear gas.

NYT

Next question.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Next time they all gather to protest, maybe they won't loot and riot, then perhaps they won't be chased away and you won't be so angry. Grrr

originally posted by: matafuchs
Weren't' the police enforcing the 7 PM Curfew at the same time he took his walk. The mayor, who condemned it, is at fault for not having her citizens off the street. Stop with the Trump is gassing his citizens BS.

The curfew was implemented by the Mayor.

Do you always make stuff up? Seriously, how hard is it to look something up before you post it?

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Next time they all gather to protest, maybe they won't loot and riot, then perhaps they won't be chased away and you won't be so angry. Grrr

They were looting and rioting in the middle of Pennsylvania Ave???

Goodness.

Thanks for being honest about your apparent hatred of Americans exercising their FIrst Amendment rights though.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yep its not antifa, even when they admit it. Its those darn rigyt supremacists.



And sire, a few fires in detroit, thats all that hapopened last night. Just a real peacefull celebration that its ridiculous to even focus on when real crimes like trump taking a picture at a church happened.

Look at this loser girl crying cause her sister was killed by portestors.

twitter.com...

Cant she just shut up and focus on trump taking a picture at a chucrh>?

And these fires are a bifg deal at all.

Look at this loser cop (probably a racist) choke up over terrorists, i mean freedom fighters, oh unless they were white wing terrorists cause then its bad, burning down a building (oh wait I cant say that, light a small very cutsey fire) with a kid inside, then blocking the fire truck from getting there.

www.wtvr.com...


Nah you are right, there was nothing at all to be concerned with. Your left wing buddies ritoing are awesome people doing the lords work.

Now trump holding this bible, THATS a huge story.

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: spacedoubt
a reply to: Grambler


Lol

Can you show me video of someone not doing something?
Is that what you are asking for

Sounds good though, huh?

There’s just no denying the fact here, no matter how much the professionals want to deflect to the church, or to BIden, or to anything except this fact:

They are defending the President’s use of the military against AMERICANS exercising their Constitutional rights for a weak-ass photo op.

Doggone it, you're off the mark again. There is no constitutional right to riot and loot or get in the way of the President, any president. At least be consistent about it.

Well gosh darn it and gee wilickers ... why dont you QUOTE me saying there’s a constitutional right to riot.

Because the Americans that Trump attacked for his photo-op were Assembling (see Amendment I).

You haven't shown proof of that. I asked for a video back on page three and I got crickets. Nothing. Either show proof or stop it.

ETA: Your NYT link is nice but the timeline is not consistent. Were the protesters leaving at 7:01 like they were supposed to or were they told to leave and didn't? The article alludes to both, so which is it? Context is everything here.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Yesterday was Monday. The 1st. Curfew was in effect. Is you hate that deep you cannot count days? Seriously, how hard is it to look something up before you post it?

a reply to: LSU2018

They weren't looting and rioting in DC when the National Guard was sicced on them. They were peacefully protesting.

If anything this seems like it gives them more of a reason to get violent.

When are we going to call it?

The supporters of state terror on here are repeatedly on the record now desperately trying to conflate the overwhelming majority of Americans on the streets protesting, Assembling peaceably, with those who are rioting and looting?

That’s whats’ going on here. The question is ... why?

We see it blatantly above. The protesters are equated with looters who are equated with “terrorists.”

Why is that? Why are the supporters of the Trump regime SO DESPERATE to blatantly misdirect the real fact there.

The President of the United States is a terrorist.