It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
a reply to: silo13
What I have found is that in the US flu vaccines do not now use chicken cells but dog kidney cells but nothing at all about dog saliva or dog saline
Oh, well, dog kidney cells... that is totally different...
NOT.
Sorry, you can keep your dog kidney/fetal/whatever garbage cell based vaccines all to yourself. Me and mine will not be participating.
originally posted by: silo13
And yeah, I don't want any 'cells' of any kind in any vaccines. Maybe the chicken yolk one is ok but even that's gross.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: silo13
IMO she seems like a nut.
I saw an interview with her where she claimed masks were killing people because we couldn't breathe on others. She posted the interview on her own twitter account.
She is not the smartest person in the world she is not doing active research into the virus. If masks were killing people as she claims then why are all the people actually doing the research and treating infected patients wearing them?
Like I said she seems like a nut.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
She claims that Covid-19 is actually caused by a batch of flu shot dispensed in 2015-16. She bases this claim off a study that was released that showed people who received the flu shot that year were more susceptible to contact the common cold, which is a coronavirus.
This is a woman whose research career was ended because she fabricated data and was caught doing so. This was after numerous other studies, some performed by co-authors on her original study, failed to replicate her results.
Then there's her claims about Fauci trying to bully her into giving him a paper that was set to be published. A story that makes absolutely no sense. First off, the lead on the paper was Dr. Frank Recetti. That's who Fauci would've requested the paper from. But even then, Mikovits herself claims the paper was in-press at the time. Meaning it had been approved by a peer-review board and was set to be printed. Fauci could have easily gotten the paper from the journal it was submitted to. And why was Fauci so desperate to get this paper? It was a confirmation study of another study. Hardly groundbreaking work.
And let's not forget her claim that Ebola could not infect human cells until she trained it to do so at Fort Detrick in 1999. Which makes completely zero sense since the first cases of ebola occurred in 1976. Also, there's no evidence she ever worked at Fort Detrick in 1999.
The woman is a conman and a liar. Looking through her history there is no reason to believe anything she says. She has made a career off of telling gullible people what they want to hear regardless of how anti-scientific those claims may be. There was a time when she was doing good, scientific work but that was under the supervision of Dr. Recetti. The second she was allowed free rein all she has done is prey on the vulnerable and ignorant.
originally posted by: asdfas
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: asdfas
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Yeah, not surprising. I like how these same people seem to think youtube removing a video is 100% proof positive that the information in it is true, no further investigation necessary
Did you see the actual video that was being spoken about?
Yes. Then I researched her background. She's disgraced and disgruntled.