Dr. Anthony Fauci's ex-employee, was jailed, finally tells all.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Violater1

I guess the link won't work since the website requires a captcha to search for cases. It's simple enough to search All Cases, choose to search by party, and then put in Mikovits' name.

As for her spurious claims about never taking the material, it's funny how she also argued that the research material was her intellectual property so it wasn't illegal for it to be in her possession.

It's also funny how she was never able to substantiate any of these claims in her lawsuit against the Whittemores. She was given nearly six years to prove her case and she came up with nothing. As a result it was thrown out, with prejudice, on March 2nd of this year.

Interesting how that seems to coincide with claims about coronavirus. If I was a less trusting man I would almost think she suddenly needed money to pay fees of some kind and jumped on the biggest story going.

Do you believe the court system can never get something wrong...OJ Simpson, George Zimmerman. There are endless scenarios where the legal system can be scrutinized for their decisions.

Why in this scenario do you believe with your whole heart that this decision was pure and proper?

I’m not saying she’s clean as a whistle, I’m just saying let her talk. Listen and consider what she says. She did some time in the medical field and was associated close with those individuals who are making decisions about our health. She’s not some Unknown, like this Ferguson guy who snowballed the world into lockdown with his bad Covid-19 outbreak models.

a reply to: Observationalist

Neil Ferguson - a " nobody " - you claimn?????????????????????? have you actually read his resume ???????????

just WTF ??????????????????

would you please compare ferguson vs mikovits on google scholar

the mind boggles

a reply to: ignorant_ape
Well he is a nobody now...he had to resign.

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Observationalist

Neil Ferguson - a " nobody " - you claimn?????????????????????? have you actually read his resume ???????????

just WTF ??????????????????

would you please compare ferguson vs mikovits on google scholar

the mind boggles

Wow...Nothing can penetrate your binary paradigm. You want this to be Ferguson vs Mikovits, nothing to add objective analysis of very important new information.

Sorry, I offended you by insulting one of your saints of science. I didn’t know He meant that much to you. You actually used capital letters for his name.

A resume won’t show you anything about a persons integrity.

Maybe Ferguson will right a book about his misadventures someday and make a video on YT about how he was framed and make a bunch of money.

Shoot to be fair, considering my previous post, I would still consider hearing him out, like I am with Mikovits.

do you believe this, New information is not dangerous, unless the ramifications of that information causes one to test the strength of their paradigm?

a reply to: silo13

Excellent Post , Excellent Information.

They wont kill her, but they will spend millions trying to discredit her.

originally posted by: IlluminatiTechnician
a reply to: silo13

Watch this video while you can. YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are removing this video like no tomorrow. It must be pretty condemning to Fauci and Gates...and I can see why. Seriously watch it quick. This one will most likely be deleted the same as the other ones on this page (if you scroll up) and on YT, FB and Twitter. If anyone can make a copy of this video, please do and keep sharing.

Video unavailable

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by a third party.

That didn't take long!

lol

originally posted by: PhyllidaDavenport
a reply to: silo13
What I have found is that in the US flu vaccines do not now use chicken cells but dog kidney cells but nothing at all about dog saliva or dog saline

Oh, well, dog kidney cells... that is totally different...

NOT.

Sorry, you can keep your dog kidney/fetal/whatever garbage cell based vaccines all to yourself. Me and mine will not be participating.

People trust "experts" too much.

They think because they had the discipline and determination to gain those credentials that they must therefore be good and honest people.

Not all of them are going to be good or honest. Some get there out of pure greed, and never stop wanting more.

And of course: quite a lot of them are good and honest. There is no group of people that is all perfectly alike.

But to blindly trust? They would need to all fall in just the one category to deserve that.


It's one thing to place your trust in "science".

It's another to put your trust in "scientists".

One of those is an idea, not a person. Ideals themselves rarely let you down.

The other is a person. People often do let you down.

Fauci, in particular, has let me down.

That didn't take long!

lol

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Right no joke my screen went black and my mouse pointer disappeared while I was watching the Video , It was no fluke either because it happen twice in a row.

You can tell by the way she talks she is a brain , no emotion very mono-tone.

a reply to: Observationalist

. She’s not some Unknown, like this Ferguson guy

you are the one that createad the her vs him binary

A resume won’t show you anything about a persons integrity.

and then attempted to move teh goal posts

originally posted by: Observationalist

do you believe this, New information is not dangerous, unless the ramifications of that information causes one to test the strength of their paradigm?

Thank you for sharing that. You have no idea how many times I am going to be using that quote from now. So many people need to be asked that question to help them realize the difference between projecting their insecurities on everyone and having a healthy and collaborative conversation. Then ask themselves why they are habitually trapping themselves in a prison of ego and narcissism. Especially needed for a culture that has a 70% burn and churn family rate of divorce. Obviously with numbers like that, a lot of parents are avoiding new information out of spite, fear and insecurities. Passing off accountability just to make yourself feel good being right doesn’t hurt the spouse you left, it hurts your kids. Then they become the same way. Adults with children that would rather cling to their precious egos and useless toys instead of setting an example and finishing what they started. All bc New Information could mean they are wrong and have to work on themselves and that’s just not as self serving as New Strokes to their egos and buttholes. I feel bad for anyone that doesn’t realize after this pandemic how important the family they started is and how important it is to calmly weigh the math on New Information to see if they can use the info to make themselves more better and balanced and lead as an example to their kids. Obviously everyone now should see accountability and positivity is way more important than the useless crap, jobs, attention and new relationships with strangers that 70% of married adults have been clinging to and using as a tool to hurt those around them to make themselves feel good. Well, none of that self serving junk and titles helped anyone worldwide, did it? But if you were already investing your energy into your family first and allowing New Information to help you and them be stronger better people, the last 60 days was just a quick fun family oriented Spring Break and you already have several plans to make sure everyone in your family has their basic needs to survive anything. Bc you taunt them how with New Information.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow
It is on bitchute.....as well as more from her.

Forget you tube.....a comment on bitchute says the vid has been uploaded and removed 155 times so far on yt lol.

Go to bitchute....scroll down past the images to 'trending' and click

Otherwise rational people are latching on to any conspiracy theory that confirms their biases in an effort to maintain their sense of normalcy. If you bought into this, you should probably just not offer any opinions about the current crisis until it's over. You are no longer able to be rational.

a reply to: asdfas
Notice the up vote figures compared to the down vote figures.

And then read the comments on the page.

Watch "A Doctor Reacts To “Plandemic"" on YouTube
youtu.be...

Seems people believe her even more after watching his video according to some comments lol.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yeah, not surprising. I like how these same people seem to think youtube removing a video is 100% proof positive that the information in it is true, no further investigation necessary

This is shocking. Ever since this began, I had numerous suspicions and thought there was a nefarious agenda behind the pandemic.

How many more whistleblowers do we need? How much more proof is needed? The censorship alone should alarm everybody.

originally posted by: asdfas
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yeah, not surprising. I like how these same people seem to think youtube removing a video is 100% proof positive that the information in it is true, no further investigation necessary

Did you see the actual video that was being spoken about?

originally posted by: p0sthuman
This is shocking. Ever since this began, I had numerous suspicions and thought there was a nefarious agenda behind the pandemic.

How many more whistleblowers do we need? How much more proof is needed? The censorship alone should alarm everybody.

I rest my case. This is the definition of confirmation bias. The new MO of these people will be to always upload their ridiculous videos to youtube, knowing full well it will be removed, and say "see! it must be true, "they" don't want you to see this!" when there are perfectly good alternative sites like bitchute that won't remove it.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: asdfas
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yeah, not surprising. I like how these same people seem to think youtube removing a video is 100% proof positive that the information in it is true, no further investigation necessary

Did you see the actual video that was being spoken about?

Yes. Then I researched her background. She's disgraced and disgruntled.

a reply to: asdfas
While watching the vid and after the vid...... but before researching her...... what did you think?