It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: RadioRobert
It's probably easier to target individual journalists, as Q and Q+ have hinted at. Also, AG Barr scared the poop out of them when he said he'd have no problem arresting journalists who crossed "the red line".
www.thedailybeast.com...
Journalists think they are as un-touchable as Comey, Brennan, McCabe, etc., think they are. We should know soon if all of them really are above the law.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: OsirianObsidian
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
And +90% of the Americans will never know until the arrests begin. That's when the 75 page indictments lay out the proof. Proof that cannot be ignored, because courts and juries (the highest authorities in the USA) will be making the news.
originally posted by: MetalThunder
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi
God Bless and Godspeed
The Future is now
We have more than we know - and nobody can take that away ...
Peace
Excelsior
Enjoy
Bricks NO MORE
But I would not support prosecution of media members or politicians for lying, even Schiff. Nail Schiff to the wall for leaking classified material, not lying.
originally posted by: onehuman
a reply to: pheonix358
So Im curious then. If you are trying to read someones mind or send them a thought or say using ESP for something, would that all fall under their ownership or be considered using their airwaves? If they have this control over the airwaves, does this mean they have the right to try and read or influence our minds using said airwaves?