Iowa Caucus results

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

But less than stood in line to see potus in new jersey

Lol
Much larger than the shire, hobbit.

Ah yes, but what the hell does that have to do with the Iowas caucus?

And, yes, Trump's enormity is, necessarily, much larger than the fictional Shire (but I'm an Australian - not from Middle Earth).

That people love to see potus in person?
As opposed to the pitiful "i claim victory" crowds tonight?

This group of dems is poop.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

But less than stood in line to see potus in new jersey

Lol
Much larger than the shire, hobbit.

Ah yes, but what the hell does that have to do with the Iowas caucus?

And, yes, Trump's enormity is, necessarily, much larger than the fictional Shire (but I'm an Australian - not from Middle Earth).

That people love to see potus in person?
As opposed to the pitiful "i claim victory" crowds tonight?

This group of dems is poop.

Ho hum, some people would cheer at an animatronic display.

a reply to: chr0naut
Some people throw salt at better nations
Ho hum
Orange man wins tonight

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

Trump had 168,231 Iowans watching his rally in various locations, including their home P.C.'s.

No doubt.

I didn't count those who must be watching from home, though, either (which would probably include you, too, wouldn't it?).

I don't live in Iowa. We were talking about Iowans attending Trump's last rally.

a reply to: carewemust
I dont think there are 175,000 people on those islands
No worries

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
Some people throw salt at better nations
Ho hum
Orange man wins tonight

I've got to admit, he's gotten lots of people from other countries laughing at him.

He is his own yuuuge ventrilloquists doll. You almost believe he is saying things himself.

Looks like a Trojan-Infected Smart Phone App may be partially to blame for the Iowa vote count seizing up.

nypost.com...

a reply to: chr0naut
Laughing all the way to new trade aggrements...
Lol
Yuge
Mr Morton

its been such a trainwreck this may be Iowas last caucus least per Obamas former campaign manager www.theguardian.com... tes

Results delay resurrects the question: should Iowa go first? Even more so than past caucuses, Iowa has received a lot of scrutiny this election cycle over whether it should continue to vote first, considering the Democratic Party is increasingly diverse and 90% of the state’s residents are white. But tonight’s issues with reporting the results of the caucuses have intensified concerns about Iowa playing such an important role in the party’s nominating contest. David Plouffe, the campaign manager for Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign, predicted this would be “the last Iowa caucus”:

so this may end up having the dems change voting order of primaries because of how bad it went + the roll out of new tech with out exactly testing it. warren went home,biden went home ,bernie left but said he would come back if he wins from same source

Trump campaign calls caucuses 'the sloppiest train wreck in history' The Trump campaign has released a statement mocking the Democratic Party for its handling of the Iowa caucuses, calling the delay in reporting of results “the sloppiest train wreck in history.” “Democrats are stewing in a caucus mess of their own creation with the sloppiest train wreck in history,” the statement from campaign manager Brad Parscale says. The campaign also raised concerns about the “fairness of the process” after some conservative personalities spread baseless claims that the delay was evidence of a Democratic conspiracy.

so trump finally weighed in i figured he would have a field day with this

And the booty mayor shows up.
That dude don't have a chance.

Bootyjig talking now. He has all the young babes voting for him it looks like.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust
I dont think there are 175,000 people on those islands
No worries

Australian population is about: 25,400,000.
New Zealand Population is about: 4,800,000.

So once again the American education system has let you down.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: chr0naut
Some people throw salt at better nations
Ho hum
Orange man wins tonight

I've got to admit, he's gotten lots of people from other countries laughing at him.

He is his own yuuuge ventrilloquists doll. You almost believe he is saying things himself.

If you get one hundred percent of your info from left wing media (lies) you would think that

And be wrong

As usual

If we could stick to the topic that would be great.

Save the other crap for the pit.

originally posted by: carewemust
Looks like a Trojan-Infected Smart Phone App may be partially to blame for the Iowa vote count seizing up.

nypost.com...

Results are in.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.





Hillary won it.

a reply to: carewemust

WTF?

Do you really believe that?

I think they are panicking with Bernie dominating and Biden struggling. You might be on to something about Bloomberg.

My theory is they are trying to take some of Bernie's votes( and everyone not named Biden) and give them to Bloomberg.

Damage control is in effect, tomorrow will be the clean up.

a reply to: chr0naut
Less than la and new york
Not let down at all
Not a bit
Nobody cares what socialist nations think
Least of all trump

originally posted by: interupt42

originally posted by: carewemust
Looks like a Trojan-Infected Smart Phone App may be partially to blame for the Iowa vote count seizing up.

nypost.com...

Results are in.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.





Hillary won it.

That would be the dnc headline

And trump won
Yugely

originally posted by: Djarums
If we could stick to the topic that would be great.

Save the other crap for the pit.

Thanks grandma
Hand counting the cheating dnc results as I type.

a reply to: shooterbrody

the difference between how the DNC and the RNC has done things is kind of a good example of the differences . Rnc was done early and effectively and well we may not even get the results of the dem's until mid day tomorrow if not later

it seems both the phones and the app had issues and or failures and at least 3 dem candidates have claimed victory (bernie,biden,Pete) but we only got like 1.9% of the vote in