Iowa Caucus results

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Could someone tell Joe that being in the 1% is not a good thing in the Iowa Caucus?

Thanks.

It's a lot of fun watching the CNN panel tonight. They are saying the final results might not be valid, LOL.

And the Biden campaign just issued a letter saying the same thing!

(Sounds like what Hillary said about Trump. "He won't accept that I beat him!")

Hey all, SFGate.com is claiming Biden has it - where did they get the info? Something stinks.

Biden claims success

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Oh boy
Burnie is here
Free polident for all!

I like Bernie, because Hillary and CNN hate Bernie.

You must also be a fan of truth and justice, as well as Trump then.

UPDATE: This Iowa caucus specialist named Vana Bash on CNN just said a person from the DNC called to tell everyone that all ballots will be counted manually. Then the person hung up.

Typical dnc soup sandwich
These people could screw up a winning Powerball ticket

The Iowa DNC just issued a statement: "Inconsistencies" in the 3 streams of vote processing discovered. Manually counting from all 1600 caucus locations is now underway.

Oh goody
Any hanging chads?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so nearly 24 times more than Trump could even fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

a reply to: carewemust

Oh no it had to be far more than 18000. For it to have been only 18k, all people of voting age had to be registered to vote and we both know that's just not the case.

Jaden

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

But less than stood in line to see potus in new jersey

Lol
Much larger than the shire, hobbit.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: DBCowboy

Could someone tell Joe that being in the 1% is not a good thing in the Iowa Caucus?

No. He got mad and left.

TheRedneck

Antiques Roadshow is on.

Makes sense.

I figure the appraiser will value ol' Joe at about 20 quid.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Oh boy
Burnie is here
Free polident for all!

I like Bernie, because Hillary and CNN hate Bernie.

You must also be a fan of truth and justice, as well as Trump then.

UPDATE: This Iowa caucus specialist named Vana Bash on CNN just said a person from the DNC called to tell everyone that all ballots will be counted manually. Then the person hung up.

Typical dnc soup sandwich
These people could screw up a winning Powerball ticket

The Iowa DNC just issued a statement: "Inconsistencies" in the 3 streams of vote processing discovered. Manually counting from all 1600 caucus locations is now underway.

Oh goody
Any hanging chads?

The only hanging chad is Chad, an intern that displeased Hillary.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

Trump had 168,231 Iowans watching his rally in various locations, including their home P.C.'s.

Democrats don't have results yet because the dead voters are having a hard time getting out of their coffins...

Warren is trading photos for wampum
Selfies for beads and shells

originally posted by: ATSAlex
Democrats don't have results yet because the dead voters are having a hard time getting out of their coffins...

Which is why they’re now counting the votes manually.

Corrupt. Votes definitely do not count when the counters are underhanded disgusting people

Uhhhh What happens if Bernie or Biden get their Polident & Prep H mixed up?

Asking for a friend.

No more itchy teeth & clean endings?

Just curious.

originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: carewemust

Oh no it had to be far more than 18000. For it to have been only 18k, all people of voting age had to be registered to vote and we both know that's just not the case.

Jaden

Eight Iowa counties have 18,000 more registered voters than people of voting age in those counties.

Source: hannity.com...

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

But less than stood in line to see potus in new jersey

Lol
Much larger than the shire, hobbit.

Ah yes, but what the hell does that have to do with the Iowas caucus?



And, yes, Trump's enormity is, necessarily, much larger than the fictional Shire (but I'm an Australian - not from Middle Earth).

originally posted by: ATSAlex
Democrats don't have results yet because the dead voters are having a hard time getting out of their coffins...

Hence the manual count

Trust a left-wing vote-counter? Nope

Buttigieg is delayed because the LEGO he was working on is complicated! Dammit!

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: sine.nomine

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Oh boy
Burnie is here
Free polident for all!

I like Bernie, because Hillary and CNN hate Bernie.

You must also be a fan of truth and justice, as well as Trump then.

UPDATE: This Iowa caucus specialist named Vana Bash on CNN just said a person from the DNC called to tell everyone that all ballots will be counted manually. Then the person hung up.

Typical dnc soup sandwich
These people could screw up a winning Powerball ticket

The Iowa DNC just issued a statement: "Inconsistencies" in the 3 streams of vote processing discovered. Manually counting from all 1600 caucus locations is now underway.

Oh goody
Any hanging chads?

The only hanging chad is Chad, an intern that displeased Hillary.

Hillary said she'd be "hanging from a noose", if that bastard (Trump) wins the election.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chr0naut

Media says caucus turnout was on par with 2016. Lower than average. Much lower than 2008. (Obama excitement 2008)

Oh, if it's on par with 2016, then 171,517 people attended then, so about 24 times more than Trump could fit in the auditorium at his Iowa rally.

Trump had 168,231 Iowans watching his rally in various locations, including their home P.C.'s.

No doubt.

I didn't count those who must be watching from home, though, either (which would probably include you, too, wouldn't it?).

Read this account from one of the Caucus.
Pretty interesting read
link