It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
They used a HIV based inert pseudovirus and it was given bioluminescent gene (luciferase)from a firefly and the spike protein from SARS. They used the pseudovirus to observe how the SARS spike protein attaches to ACE2 cells via the bioluminescent gene it carried. The study had nothing to do with trying to make Bat coronavirus infectious to humans.
Coronavirus live updates: US and China clash at WHO over Taiwan’s participation, death toll tops 500
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
The mortality rate of novel #coronavirus in China stands at 2.1%, which is lower than that of
- Ebola (40.4%),
- SARS (10%),
- MERS (34.4%) and
- H1N1 of 2009 (17.4%)
China's UK ambassador
@AmbLiuXiaoMing
revealed the figures in a press conference in London on Thursday
twitter.com...
do we believe it?
originally posted by: DOcean
It only takes a thread about 10 pages before you all start eating each other.
There is very little fact being posted into this thread; a thread that start as a helpful source to monitor a concerning situation. At this point it has devolved into conjecture, purely emotional responses and d*ck measuring.
Maybe you should take a step back and take a look at what you’re doing before you discredit this site even more.
Taiwan’s foreign minister criticized the World Health Organization for referring to the island as part of China amid a worsening coronavirus outbreak.
“@WHO, what’s wrong with you? First you called us ‘Taiwan, China,’ then you changed to ‘Taipei.’ You misreported the confirmed cases, & now you call us ‘Taipei & Environs.’ Look! Taiwan is #Taiwan & not any part of the #PRC,” foreign minister Joseph Wu wrote in a sharply worded tweet Thursday.
As a United Nations body, the WHO treats the separately governed island as part of China, a view Taiwan’s government rejects. The WHO was forced to correct its coronavirus situation report Monday after erroneously saying there were 13 cases in Taiwan. Taiwan’s Centers for Disease Control says there have been 11 confirmed cases of the virus in Taiwan so far.
Wash your hands for 20 minutes
originally posted by: that1lurker
a reply to: weirdguy
Thanks for helping me understand. I also brought this up because I had read in another study that asian males have an extremely large number of ACE2 cells in the lung. That would make asian males more likely to get infected, no? Or would it just make the virus worse? It would be interesting to see the data of those infected and to compare females and males.
A reminder: these are preliminary reports that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or be reported in news media as established information
We also noticed that the only Asian donor (male) has a much higher ACE2-expressing cell ratio than white and African American donors (2.50% vs. 0.47% of all cells). This might explain the observation that the new Coronavirus pandemic and previous SARS-Cov pandemic are concentrated in the Asian area.
originally posted by: Pommer89
Just to throw this into the mix, some people are saying this virus originated in a lab in wuhan, ok I can go along with that but why would China release it?
One viewpoint I havnt seen mentioned, correct if I'm wrong, climate control? We all know china is the worst offender when it comes to carbon emissions, could this of been a way by activists to slow down climate change?
Iv not really put alot of thought into it, just food for thought really.
originally posted by: revmoofoo
Good morning everyone!
Here are the latest figures from WuFlu.Live
Confirmed: 28341
Deaths: 566
Recovered: 1261
Rev
originally posted by: slatesteam
a reply to: weirdguy
Starred ya anyway. Tomato, Tohmahto
originally posted by: ARM1968
originally posted by: that1lurker
a reply to: weirdguy
I've seen lots of discussion on different sites about Prof.Zhengli's study. It was a study on the virus that was published right before it started infecting a lot of people in Wuhan. I can provide a link where it talks about it. I think it may also have the full text link there, too.
Anyways from the way it sounds, the bad pneumonia cases and deaths are from people being reinfected with the virus, which may explain why it took a while for people to become deathly ill from the virus and why some people recover. I'm not entirely sure if thats correct and you may have very well answered this already. Antibody-dependent enhancement is what people are referring too. I'm guessing this may have been discussed here already. Just curious as to what you think and if you were already aware of it.
Have heard anecdotal reports of rapid reinfection which is not good, as first time round your immune system gets pretty much bombed. So it would make sense. It also makes the threat that much greater. Not a great prospect if it turns out to actually be the case.