It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
I believe the 24 incubation period comes from this paper
www.medrxiv.org...
"The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to 24.0 days)"
Thats the same paper - and again, it doesn't say anything whatsoever about how they arrived at the number '24' when they gave the range. And again, the rest of the numbers are actually very encouraging... only about 5% have serious complications requiring treatment (hospitalization), and only 1.3% die.
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
I believe the 24 incubation period comes from this paper
www.medrxiv.org...
"The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to 24.0 days)"
Thats the same paper - and again, it doesn't say anything whatsoever about how they arrived at the number '24' when they gave the range. And again, the rest of the numbers are actually very encouraging... only about 5% have serious complications requiring treatment (hospitalization), and only 1.3% die.
Yes but 93.6% of the cases are still in hospital so we are faced with the usual dilemmas debating the mortality rate. But very basic info from the paper should be safe enough. Wouldn't be so confident about 24 day incubation, but would certainly be on my mind if I ever needed to quarantine myself or anyone else.
Gave the wrong link before, that was just the abstract, here's full pdf. Useful data in the tables at the bottom.
www.medrxiv.org...
the initial incubation was 14 days, now those on the frontline are saying 24
originally posted by: ItsOkToBeHappy
Just as I suspected you are much more vulnerable to the coronavirus if you are a smoker because you have more ACE2 receptors in your lower respiratory, which is where the coronavirus enters your cells . I knew that had to be one of the dumbest things I've ever heard that smoking would make you lower risk. Smoking makes you at a higher risk for everything. Info: www.preprints.org...
a reply to: butcherguy
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
I believe the 24 incubation period comes from this paper
www.medrxiv.org...
"The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to 24.0 days)"
Thats the same paper - and again, it doesn't say anything whatsoever about how they arrived at the number '24' when they gave the range. And again, the rest of the numbers are actually very encouraging... only about 5% have serious complications requiring treatment (hospitalization), and only 1.3% die.
Yes but 93.6% of the cases are still in hospital so we are faced with the usual dilemmas debating the mortality rate. But very basic info from the paper should be safe enough. Wouldn't be so confident about 24 day incubation, but would certainly be on my mind if I ever needed to quarantine myself or anyone else.
Gave the wrong link before, that was just the abstract, here's full pdf. Useful data in the tables at the bottom.
www.medrxiv.org...
The illness lasts from symptoms to death 23 - 27 days
It seems when the flu like conditions materialise it’s just a few short days until the breathing pneumonia symptoms, hence the hundreds of videos of people dropping dead in there streets while China is waging a war on information
Now think of the hospital bed requirements
Lol just lol it’s staggering
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: TritonTaranis
the initial incubation was 14 days, now those on the frontline are saying 24
I've still only seen 1 source that says up to 24 days incubation period and that source (posted a few pages back) does not provide any context for why they had "up to 24 days" for the incubation period.
What am I missing here?
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: TritonTaranis
the initial incubation was 14 days, now those on the frontline are saying 24
I've still only seen 1 source that says up to 24 days incubation period and that source (posted a few pages back) does not provide any context for why they had "up to 24 days" for the incubation period.
What am I missing here?
originally posted by: Necrose
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
I believe the 24 incubation period comes from this paper
www.medrxiv.org...
"The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to 24.0 days)"
Thats the same paper - and again, it doesn't say anything whatsoever about how they arrived at the number '24' when they gave the range. And again, the rest of the numbers are actually very encouraging... only about 5% have serious complications requiring treatment (hospitalization), and only 1.3% die.
Yes but 93.6% of the cases are still in hospital so we are faced with the usual dilemmas debating the mortality rate. But very basic info from the paper should be safe enough. Wouldn't be so confident about 24 day incubation, but would certainly be on my mind if I ever needed to quarantine myself or anyone else.
Gave the wrong link before, that was just the abstract, here's full pdf. Useful data in the tables at the bottom.
www.medrxiv.org...
The illness lasts from symptoms to death 23 - 27 days
It seems when the flu like conditions materialise it’s just a few short days until the breathing pneumonia symptoms, hence the hundreds of videos of people dropping dead in there streets while China is waging a war on information
Now think of the hospital bed requirements
Lol just lol it’s staggering
FAKE AGAIN !! MISINFORMATION!
They're not dropping dead, they're losing consciousness because they're not used to breathing with a mask on.
Have you tried having a mask on all day?
originally posted by: Necrose
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: TritonTaranis
the initial incubation was 14 days, now those on the frontline are saying 24
I've still only seen 1 source that says up to 24 days incubation period and that source (posted a few pages back) does not provide any context for why they had "up to 24 days" for the incubation period.
What am I missing here?
If I wrote a tweet about incubation period being 50 days, TritonTaranis would accept it and report it everywhere because it's the highest number, thus it sparks sensationalism.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Necrose
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
I believe the 24 incubation period comes from this paper
www.medrxiv.org...
"The median incubation period was 3.0 days (range, 0 to 24.0 days)"
Thats the same paper - and again, it doesn't say anything whatsoever about how they arrived at the number '24' when they gave the range. And again, the rest of the numbers are actually very encouraging... only about 5% have serious complications requiring treatment (hospitalization), and only 1.3% die.
Yes but 93.6% of the cases are still in hospital so we are faced with the usual dilemmas debating the mortality rate. But very basic info from the paper should be safe enough. Wouldn't be so confident about 24 day incubation, but would certainly be on my mind if I ever needed to quarantine myself or anyone else.
Gave the wrong link before, that was just the abstract, here's full pdf. Useful data in the tables at the bottom.
www.medrxiv.org...
The illness lasts from symptoms to death 23 - 27 days
It seems when the flu like conditions materialise it’s just a few short days until the breathing pneumonia symptoms, hence the hundreds of videos of people dropping dead in there streets while China is waging a war on information
Now think of the hospital bed requirements
Lol just lol it’s staggering
FAKE AGAIN !! MISINFORMATION!
They're not dropping dead, they're losing consciousness because they're not used to breathing with a mask on.
Have you tried having a mask on all day?
BS lol lmao not used to breathing with a dust mask 😂😂😂😂😂😂
They’re dropping because you can show zero symptoms and then breathing difficulties arise, oxygen levels get dangerously low and they pass out
originally posted by: AlbatrossMaker
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Everyone in the us knows the astronomical cost of a 14 days stay in the hospital in the US would be. Think about that.
And again, anybody knows why when on Google Earth you put in Wuhan, it takes you to a river.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
originally posted by: Necrose
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: TritonTaranis
the initial incubation was 14 days, now those on the frontline are saying 24
I've still only seen 1 source that says up to 24 days incubation period and that source (posted a few pages back) does not provide any context for why they had "up to 24 days" for the incubation period.
What am I missing here?
If I wrote a tweet about incubation period being 50 days, TritonTaranis would accept it and report it everywhere because it's the highest number, thus it sparks sensationalism.
Isn’t 14 days enough to worry about?
JESUS CHRIST