It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does this satellite image show the scale of China's coronavirus cremations?
High sulphur dioxide levels at the centre of the coronavirus outbreak could be a sign of mass cremations, it has been claimed. Satellite maps in recent days have shown alarming levels of SO2 around Wuhan, the Chinese city where the outbreak began. In addition, there were high sulphur dioxide levels in the city of Chongqing which is also under quarantine. Scientists say that sulphur dioxide is produced when bodies are cremated, and also when medical waste is incinerated. A Twitter user who investigated the maps suggested that dead bodies could be being burned on the outskirts of the city.
One map from Czech-based weather service Windy.com showed sulphur dioxide levels in Wuhan at a staggering 1,350 micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m3) over the weekend. For comparison, the World Health Organisation (WHO) says that a dosage of 500 µg/m3 should not be exceeded for more than 10 minutes. The UK government considers a 15-minute concentration of 533 µg/m3 to be 'high'. According to the map, the SO2 levels were lower today but Wuhan and Chongqing still stood out compared to much of China. Parts of Wuhan still showed concentrations above 500 µg/m3 on Monday, the map suggested. Scientists say that cremating bodies releases SO2 along with other pollutants including nitrogen oxides.
originally posted by: mikell
A bounce on the infection rate but still slowing.
wuflu.live...
originally posted by: St Udio
a reply to: MrRCflying
congrats... sounds like you developed an actual Sanctuary....
the only shortcoming is that the Sanctuary is vunerable to Drone Attack....Sniper exercises
best wishes for all of youse
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Navieko
The impact to the economy is going to be hell, unknown territory...eliminate debt now and maybe get bees and start making honey.
Strap yourself in that's for sure.
Forget eliminating debt... Let them come to my "infected" house and get it. If things start to look worse, I am spending my funds on another 6 months worth of food and supplies. I have 5 months worth now. I would like to be able to have my family hold out for a year if needed.
Hope you don't live in a welfare HUD rental house in a big warm city.
Nope. In the country, own home, 5 acres, well water, backup heat, generator to power well if needed. 5 plus months of food for family of 5. 6 tyvec suits, head covers, goggles, 50+ pair of nitrile gloves, booties, 18 N95 masks, reperator with P100 filters, fogger with disinfectant. 2 big dogs, and firearms for hunting and protection.
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Navieko
The impact to the economy is going to be hell, unknown territory...eliminate debt now and maybe get bees and start making honey.
Strap yourself in that's for sure.
Forget eliminating debt... Let them come to my "infected" house and get it. If things start to look worse, I am spending my funds on another 6 months worth of food and supplies. I have 5 months worth now. I would like to be able to have my family hold out for a year if needed.
Hope you don't live in a welfare HUD rental house in a big warm city.
Nope. In the country, own home, 5 acres, well water, backup heat, generator to power well if needed. 5 plus months of food for family of 5. 6 tyvec suits, head covers, goggles, 50+ pair of nitrile gloves, booties, 18 N95 masks, reperator with P100 filters, fogger with disinfectant. 2 big dogs, and firearms for hunting and protection.
and your address is?...
Some peoples form of prepping is knowing where preppers live
originally posted by: GoldGlobal
I See they say the quarantine for the Diamond Princess cruise ship is scheduled to end on February 19.
If they just confirmed additional infected passengers yesterday, that could have been spreading virus at least up til Feb 9, that will effectively only be a 10 day quarantine after these contagious people were taken off ship
originally posted by: drussell41
originally posted by: Oppenheimer67
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: MrRCflying
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Navieko
The impact to the economy is going to be hell, unknown territory...eliminate debt now and maybe get bees and start making honey.
Strap yourself in that's for sure.
Forget eliminating debt... Let them come to my "infected" house and get it. If things start to look worse, I am spending my funds on another 6 months worth of food and supplies. I have 5 months worth now. I would like to be able to have my family hold out for a year if needed.
Hope you don't live in a welfare HUD rental house in a big warm city.
Nope. In the country, own home, 5 acres, well water, backup heat, generator to power well if needed. 5 plus months of food for family of 5. 6 tyvec suits, head covers, goggles, 50+ pair of nitrile gloves, booties, 18 N95 masks, reperator with P100 filters, fogger with disinfectant. 2 big dogs, and firearms for hunting and protection.
and your address is?...
Some peoples form of prepping is knowing where preppers live
Yes, it is. Heard it straight from the horse's mouth (former SWAT, military police, etc.) I hope he was kidding, but I don't know.
Coronavirus could have incubation period of 24 days — 10 days longer than previously thought
Close Coronavirus could have incubation period of 24 days — 10 days longer than previously thought Research says coronavirus ‘spreads rapidly by human-to-human transmission’ Kate Ng 1 hour ago Medical researchers in China have found the incubation period for coronavirus ranges up to 24 days — 10 days longer than experts previously thought. The research was co-authored by Dr Zhong Nanshan, who discovered the SARS coronavirus in 2003 and has been appointed as a leading advisor in managing the current coronavirus crisis.
originally posted by: primalfractal
a reply to: drussell41
I agree, don't think masks etc will necessarily stop it but do think they will increase your chances of being safe, not sure by how much.
You've inspired me to look into decontamination protocols
Had Guardia twice myself, disgusting disease, most recently after fires here in Aus from washing in the creek. Was pretty damn dirty, tanks were empty, shoulda known better, lots of dead animals from fires, paid the price.
originally posted by: GoldGlobal
a reply to: musicismagic
A total of 70 people have tested positive for the Wuhan coronavirus on board the ship, which is carrying more than 3,700 people, including crew and passengers.
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
Coronavirus could have incubation period of 24 days — 10 days longer than previously thought
Close Coronavirus could have incubation period of 24 days — 10 days longer than previously thought Research says coronavirus ‘spreads rapidly by human-to-human transmission’ Kate Ng 1 hour ago Medical researchers in China have found the incubation period for coronavirus ranges up to 24 days — 10 days longer than experts previously thought. The research was co-authored by Dr Zhong Nanshan, who discovered the SARS coronavirus in 2003 and has been appointed as a leading advisor in managing the current coronavirus crisis.
www.independent.co.uk...
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: celltypespecific
This is why I have said on other threads, and continue to say here, I just cannot comprehend the logic of using a ship as a quarantine. Ships are a floating incubator for the transmission of viruses and disease! They always have been. This isn't a secret, how many times have we all seen MSM news stories about large segments of a cruise ship coming down with some ailment aboard a ship? All of the mechanical (HVAC) systems are connected, all of the water systems are connected and all of the sanitary systems are connected.
It's only a matter of time before every single person aboard that floating death trap becomes infected with this virus. They quarantined the ship based on a single handful of possible cases, and in the process they've sentenced 3,700 other people to their fate.
And, while this situation may be 'interesting' in some twisted clinical sort of way (i.e. calculating actual survival rates in a closed environment), at the same time it is disturbing beyond description! I understand the need to perhaps quarantine persons (in general), but I absolutely do NOT understand, nor do I accept, quarantining individuals in an environment where they will almost certainly contract the virus! Again, a ship is a floating incubator for the spread of viruses like this. If you need to quarantine someone, do it in an environment which is suitable for preventing the further spread of the virus...NOT onboard a ship where you have limited trained staff, limited medical facilities and an environment just ripe to spread disease!
A "Quarantine" must also meet stringent legal and ethical criteria. Based on the limited news reports we are receiving, I do not believe these criteria are being met. Specifically:
(note: underlines by me)
Guidance on when and how human rights can be restricted to prevent the spread of infectious disease is found in The Siracusa Principles, a non-binding document developed by the Siracusa International Institute for Criminal Justice and Human Rights and adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1984.[32] The Siracusa Principles state that restrictions on human rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights must meet standards of legality, evidence-based necessity, proportionality, and gradualism, noting that public health can be used as grounds for limiting certain rights if the state needs to take measures ‘aimed at preventing disease or injury or providing care for the sick and injured.’ Limitations on rights (such as quarantine) must be ‘strictly necessary,’ meaning that they must:
- respond to a pressing public or social need (health)
- proportionately pursue a legitimate aim (prevent the spread of infectious disease)
- be the least restrictive means required for achieving the purpose of the limitation
- be provided for and carried out in accordance with the law
- be neither arbitrary nor discriminatory
- only limit rights that are within the jurisdiction of the state seeking to impose the limitation.[33]
In addition, when quarantine is imposed, public health ethics specify that:
- all restrictive actions must be well-supported by data and scientific evidence
- all information must be made available to the public
- all actions must be explained clearly to those whose rights are restricted and to the public
- all actions must be subject to regular review and reconsideration.
Finally, the state is ethically obligated to offer certain guarantees:
- Infected people will not be threatened or abused.
- Basic needs such as food, water, medical care, and preventive care will be provided.
- Communication with loved ones and with caretakers will be permitted.
- Constraints on freedom will be applied equally, regardless of social considerations.
- Patients will be compensated fairly for economic and material losses, including salary.[34]
Wiki Source
Bottom line...I have a major problem with these forced quarantines (in general), and a super major issue with the shipboard quarantines!! For some, they are a death sentence whereas treated differently they may not be.