Sick of the LGBT agenda

originally posted by: Macenroe82
Sorry I went silent last night after a few comments.
I'm at work and had to hit the sheets early.

I'm glad to see I'm not alone in this.
Even a few representatives from the community weighed in, which is great.

I'm just tired of everything needing to be sexualized and pushed on children to the point where kids don't even know if they are a boy or girl.

You are not alone.

For over 45 years I have had gay friends, and even some transsexual ones. I saw their plight then and thought it was wrong.

However, now I see the tables turned and the LGBT community attempting to get even by demanding special rights and the "right" to educate even small children on the joys of LGBT. This I do not approve of and find as offensive as I found the persecution of LGBT when I was in college. I also don't approve of every single TV show feeling obligated to have LGBT subplots and frequently open sexuality, just as I don't approve of seeing cis-gender naked people humping on prime time TV where children are watching.

As an aside:

What many people don't realize is the over-sexualization we see on TV, in movies, print, porn is having the opposite effect of what people think it will. This may backfire on LGBT just as it is doing for cis-gender.

For example, Japan, where young people are no longer interested in sex and they are having a marriage dirth, and a refusal to have children at such a rate that villages are disappearing all over the country. I lived in Japan for a few years in my early adulthood, and even then it was highly sexualized, and now over-sexualization of media is rampant.

What has happened as a result? Let me give an old example to help you understand. In the 1800's men used to moon over a "well turned ankle" as sexy. Then skirts went up and shoes went down and every woman had her ankle exposed. Constant exposure to ankles on women made them become no longer sexy, ho hum, who cares about an ankle these days? Almost no one, except as a fetish. So what happens when porn is rampant, humping naked bodies are on 7PM TV shows and in the majority of movies? Actual intercourse becomes ho hum, who cares? I can take care of that physical need myself faster and with less hassle and no performance anxiety.

But many see this as a good thing, after all right now the human self extinction movement is gaining momentum. Looks like with all the in your face sex being pushed on even pre-schoolers, they may end up ho-hum about it all. They may prefer to take care of the biological urge themselves and get the biological urge satiated quickly, as many prefer fast and faster food.

www.telegraph.co.uk...
www.theatlantic.com...
www.theguardian.com...

a reply to: Hecate666

Thank you for summarizing it all up better than I could.
You are bang on correct.

We all know that for many decades secrets were hidden within small special interest groups bonded together by the strongest glues...glues we now know include MONEY/POWER pedo action MONEY/POWER and cannibaslism MONEY/POWER and dark worship MONEY/POWER...

As hard as these groups have tried to normalise these wicked negative dynamics on a social level using bastardised laws and money to do so... the masses still firmly reject them...of course these small special interest groups work together...and have historically kept the darkest secrets and had the most money.

Epsteins playbook came directly from the gay playbook used for decades before him....those who taught Epstein used Gay to imprison people and make them do dark biddings....Epstein EXPANDED THE BUSINESS to include EVERYONE by instituting pedophilia ….this meant he could control not only the gay groups but now also the hetro majority.....now even that viscious circle is being brought to and end.

Normalisation of gay was spearheaded to disempower those using these people as pawns.

There will be no normalisation of pedophilia or cannibalism or dark worship...ever....and this is why the War began....once they dipped into the masses using pedo behaviour as their ball-chain ...there HAD TO BE A BATTLE TO THE END....and this Battle shall be to the end.

a reply to: The2Billies

I never looked at it from that perspective.
Thank you for that.

a reply to: Skid Mark

I had to kind of chuckle in an "oh lordy" kind of way...

Lesbians are having the same problem! Apparently lesbian dating sites are being overwhelmed with men identifying as "lesbians" overwhelming the sites... and if any woman objects, they are of course called "transphobes" and "bigots" and "TERFs." All because these women want to date women.

And here's the real kicker: While the women are insulted and demeaned for preferring women to men identifying as "women," there's no blowback for the men identifying as women who reject other men identifying as women!!!

a reply to: Macenroe82

I think of this quote whenever I see somebody posts about multiple genders.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

Source
This is how you make a dystopian society. It doesn't happen overnight. They're made one absurdity at a time. When facts and reality no longer matter, what does?

a reply to: Macenroe82

wait it cost 30,000 grand to paint a cross walk

WOW someone seriously bumped the tax payer

I cant tell you that would cost no more than 100 dollars for exterior road marking paint
in 7 colours for a cross walk

How big was that cross walk ?

Shinjuki crossing big ?


The things is , its not an agenda its not being forced , its just the media putting out stories , which is just to promote awareness

if you think its a forced agenda then its obviously bothering you for some reason
because you feel its fundamentally going to change your every day life to make you adhere to the fact there are other people out there that live differently from you

IS that really a bad thing ?

Anyway as for the children drag readings , absolutely no need

Children shouldn't be expected to learn about this # until they actually start to go through puberty , when sex education starts to make sense because of puberty.
When you start to have sexual feelings etc , or at that age you naturally start to question your sexuality because of puberty.

Only children I can see learning about this stuff earlier are those with same sex parents where an explanation is required earlier

One of the definitions of life is the desire and ability to reproduce. While homosexuals cannot biologically reproduce naturally with their same sex partners, the recruitment, grooming, and sexualization of children is a manner in which this is accomplished. This is the "agenda" the OP was referencing.
While certainly some people develop homosexual tendencies without such influence, many do (also, there are some that develop these tendencies as a result of sexual abuse).
So the questions really are, "is the sexualization of children a right of the LBGT community," and, if so, "where is the line between that and paedophilia?"
An additional question is, "is paedophilia just another 'sexual orientation,' a mental illness, or a punishable crime?" (Side note, the idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation is already being promoted by some teachers in California- potentially opening the door to admitted pedophiles as teachers and child care workers).

Post script: I won't respond to angry, illogically emotional outburts of personal attacks. I phrased this as honestly and neutrally as possible for civil discussion. I'm not promoting or dismissing anything, simply presenting where society is at and the questions it is asking.

a reply to: JohnProctor
Even if they do class it as a sexual preference which I hope never ever happens
children still cant consent

so its still a crime no matter how much they polish that particular turd

a reply to: JohnProctor

That is absolutely disgusting.
And the way the world is going, it wouldn't surprise me if pedo is supposed to be accepted in the not so distant future.

As for the "Angry, illogical emotional outbursts and attacks, so far this thread has gone fairly well.
A couple of posters defending the behavior or making wild accusations,
but if they are ignored they go away fairly quickly.

Thank you for your comment.

originally posted by: JohnProctor
An additional question is, "is paedophilia just another 'sexual orientation,' a mental illness, or a punishable crime?" (Side note, the idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation is already being promoted by some teachers in California- potentially opening the door to admitted pedophiles as teachers and child care workers).

The fact that a pedophile is attracted doesn't make it right to act on it

in the same way as a man attracted to a woman has no right to rape her. Every

one is capable of exercising self control.

If not given shouldnt be taken.....

One of the definitions of life is the desire and ability to reproduce.

With that is also to care for and protect and a young body is immature and not

ready to perform sexual activity, so if nothing else it has to be WRONG

originally posted by: eletheia

The fact that a pedophile is attracted doesn't make it right to act on it in the same way as a man attracted to a woman has no right to rape her.

Excellent point.

originally posted by: dfnj2015
It's funny how the people who are the most outspoken against homosexuality turn out to be one in the end!

What is funny totally messed up is your kind of reaction to a perfectly reasonable rant about what is being shoved down our throats by a tiny vocal minority of the radical-trans nutbags.

originally posted by: JohnProctor
An additional question is, "is paedophilia just another 'sexual orientation,' a mental illness, or a punishable crime?"

The mental state of being a pedophile is, of course, a mental illness. The mere suggestion that it could be considered a 'sexual orientation' is sheer lunacy.

Any pedophile who acts out - engages in sex with children - is a criminal, but the devil is in the details.

Take the following three examples:

a) an 18 yr old who has sex with his 16 yr old girlfriend

b) a 30 yr old woman who engages in sex with a 16 year old totally willing boy

c) an adult male who engages in sex with a 5 yr old

I don't consider a) to be a crime.

I do consider b) to be a crime, but nowhere near the level of c).

As for c), the older the male is, the worse the crime. Meaning - I'm not sure I would be in favor of permanent castration for a 13 yr old who has sex with a 6 yr old. It is bad, but he is still a child himself.

But for a 21+ yr old... I'd be in favor of the death penalty, but at a bare minimum, permanent castration.

originally posted by: Kalamitous
You can be legally same sex married on Sunday and go to work on Monday and be fired for being gay.

I believe in freedom.

This includes the freedom of business owners to discriminate in any way they choose.

Yes, that means a business owner should be free to not only put a sign in their window saying they refuse service to black people. but to actually refuse to provide service to black people.

They should also be free to hire who they want, and fire any employee for any reason or no reason at all.

a reply to: tanstaafl


A pedophile is not interested in teens a pedophiles interests are in

children who havent reached puberty, prior to them being fully matured

and that if for no other reason makes it wrong, WRONG, WRONG

by any standards.

a reply to: eletheia

Exactly.
Defenders of those atrocities can put as much lipstick on that pig as they want.
It is vial and evil on every single level imaginable.

a reply to: tanstaafl

real shame we didnt have pedophilia laws during medieval Europe
half the royal families would have probably died out.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
b) a 30 yr old woman who engages in sex with a 16 year old totally willing boy
…

I do consider b) to be a crime, but nowhere near the level of c).

In most states the age of consent is 16.

a reply to: tanstaafl

This includes the freedom of business owners to discriminate in any way they choose.

Yes, that means a business owner should be free to not only put a sign in their window saying they refuse service to black people. but to actually refuse to provide service to black people.

But not the freedom to visit any establishment one wishes without being discriminated against or denied service.

I believe in freedom.

No you don't. You believe in taking away others' freedom.