The president has a complete 'meltdown' today following a Congressional vote

a reply to: Fallingdown

Yeah. Us being there wasn't an "endless war scenario," because we weren't engaged. We were a stabilizing force, which is a good thing.

Pulling out allowed what is happening now... to happen.

Congress cannot get together to fix the failing infrastructure here in the country we live in.

But when the issue is a prepetialy war ... so that Russia doesn't control more of a bombed out country called Syria ... they have no problem putting their partisanship aside.

What's even more interesting than that; the Democrat party is supporting more not less war.

a reply to: Liquesence

This is were I agree with trump supporters.

I think a little chaos is healthy.
That we need it.

That's why I like andrew yang so much.

Changing things up.

I even sent in a question to andrew yang.
He's going to read and answer all our questions in a 10 hour streaming conference on the 18th.

a reply to: dfnj2015

lol I read that as trumper tantrum at first lol

a reply to: Liquesence

" Define a 1st rate politician. "


There is no such Animal unless you consider Parasites .

a reply to: proximo

Do you know what it was that we promised the kurds?

If you say you do can you prove it.

Because I think and this is just my opinion, that we promised them more than that.

a reply to: DanDanDat

Congress cannot get together to fix the failing infrastructure here in the country we live in.

Tell that to McConnell. He's the one who won't bring the House bills to a vote in the Senate.

But when the issue is a prepetialy war

What is that?

so that Russia doesn't control more of a bombed out country called Syria

Now they do. They also have former US bases, abandoned so quickly that we left most of our stuff there. That they now have.

a reply to: scraedtosleep

I think a little chaos is healthy.
That we need it.

It's a lot more than a little.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Liquesence

" Define a 1st rate politician. "


There is no such Animal unless you consider Parasites .

So there are no 1st rate politicians?

What about 2nd rate?

a reply to: Fallingdown

For me it’s not as much that the forces were pulled out. It was the message it sent for future perspective allies .

Agreed. That is the real issue here.

Not like we haven’t done that before though .

Doesn't that make it look like trump is just more of the same?

The same puppet masters pulling the strings and abandoning our allies once again.

a reply to: sooth

unwinnable moment in history.

Agreed.

a reply to: DanDanDat

Congress cannot get together to fix the failing infrastructure here in the country we live in. But when the issue is a prepetialy war ... so that Russia doesn't control more of a bombed out country called Syria ... they have no problem putting their partisanship aside.

Truth.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Define a 1st rate politician.

Ron paul?

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Liquesence

" Define a 1st rate politician. "


There is no such Animal unless you consider Parasites .

So there are no 1st rate politicians?

What about 2nd rate?

Plenty of them too . They Serve What Purpose Again > ?

originally posted by: Nickn3
Pelosi is a third rate politician. She is loosing it a little more everyday.
MAGA!

Like you said!

She's the one who 'lost it'...

a reply to: Liquesence

Agreed.

Don't get me wrong I wasn't defending what trump just did only saying that a chaotic nature isn't always a negative.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: RazorV66

Pelosi is a 3rd rate politician.

Define a 1st rate politician.

I can’t because I don’t think we have ever seen one.
But one thing is certain, it’s not Pelosi.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: RazorV66

Pelosi is a 3rd rate politician.

Define a 1st rate politician.

I can’t because I don’t think we have ever seen one.
But one thing is certain, it’s not Pelosi.

I didn't ask to name one, I asked to define one.

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: DanDanDat

Congress cannot get together to fix the failing infrastructure here in the country we live in.

Tell that to McConnell. He's the one who won't bring the House bills to a vote in the Senate.

But when the issue is a prepetialy war

What is that?

so that Russia doesn't control more of a bombed out country called Syria

Now they do. They also have former US bases, abandoned so quickly that we left most of our stuff there. That they now have.

Infrastructure? "Blame my partisan villain of choice."

War? "Here are all the reasons we need to keep fighting"

Its sad what we have become. We have been fighting in the middle east my whole life ... but we have to keep fighting with no end in sight because... because of bases we put in the middle east.

We use to call people who made arguments like that war mongers. Now we call them liberals. Perhaps I have to rethink my belief that its the liberals among us that will move us into a prosperous future; they are proving to be too short sighted to ever make good on their ideals.

Hearing now that Nancy Pelosi really went bonkers in that meeting.

She has snapped 😃