Damning study about WiFi and health effects

Like many (no doubt) I have read articles about WiFi and the possible health effects a continuous exposure to the wireless environment can have on the human body.... many non mainstream articles saying WiFi can hazardous to one's health along with women do not carry your mobile phone in your bra etc etc. due to the risk of breast cancer. Kids and people with weird brain tumors on the same side their head they use for talking on their mobiles.. stuff like that does raise a question IMO.

With the sperm counts falling in places like America and Japan (many other first world countries which are wired up) you have to wonder do we really have to worry about WW3 or an asteroid impact ? Maybe we will just grow old and die with no replacements... Just a thought and the article is not even about 5G..

What a great conspiracy to brings earth's population down some dreamed up utopian level by TPTB, no ?

There are many who have a vested interest (money and livelihood) in seeing Wifi proliferate and with the new 5G towers being installed all over the place I wonder if any of the dooms day articles are correct or even partially correct ?

Highlights

•

7 effects have each been repeatedly reported following Wi-Fi & other EMF exposures.
•

Established Wi-Fi effects, include apoptosis, oxidat. stress &:
•

testis/sperm dysfunct; Neuropsych; DNA impact; hormone change; Ca2+ rise.
•

Wi-Fi is thought to act via voltage-gated calcium channel activation.
•

One claim of no Wi-Fi effects was found to be deeply flawed.

the link has the article which goes into much more detail for those who might be interested.
www.sciencedirect.com...

a reply to: 727Sky

It is time to get out the leaded paint again to protect ourselves from 5G.

More serious now. I scrolled through the article to get myself an overview if I even can understand what they write, before I begin to read it thorough.

It turned out that most of the stuff I do not understand (yet). But there is something about that S4 helix voltage sensorsin our brains. This is a conspiracy homepage and now get this:

S4 is the name of the alleged Bob Lazar UFO/alien craft hangar. It is questionable of what Lazar says is true but here is to coincidence:

S4 is the name of the site/hangar where they allegedly tried to get those UFO fire up. It was said that they were like mentally controlled and that the pilots interface with the craft.

That is similar to what these S4 helix voltage sensors in our brains do, is what the article says. I learned that for inducing voltages, any magnetic field has to swing. I think it is the rate of change that induces voltages, not the presence of the field itself. It makes sense, see these shake flashlights. The core runs through the coil and pushes the electrons appart. That makes the electrons angry. And they want to rush back together to balance it out. The change in the magnetic field disrupts this balancing.

a reply to: 727Sky

If true about falling sperm counts in men, then this would make sense with thee towers everywhere and wifi in every high street!

a reply to: CrazeeWorld777

magic word is money again ! who carese about health if there 's so much money in stake…
perheps inventing radiation that is good for us ?

a reply to: ressiv

They say a small amount of daily radiation can benefit evolution. So I say, lets put some on top of it, on top of the natural radiation by setting of nukes everywhere on the planet.

It can not hurt, right? Oh damn I think we did that already!

The way WiFi has been introduced into our lives, and the way 5G is being introduced into our lives, reminds me of the way cigarettes were introduced into our lives--by way of some measure of deception. With cigarettes, the knowledge of harm existed, but was basically covered up by the manufacturers.

With the EMF, the companies have determined arbitrary 'safety levels' that do not comport with reality. There have been no tests done to see the actual harm caused.

With cigarettes, the military passed out free cigarettes to all recruits for a number of years, assuring addiction.

With EMF, it's just been delivered, no tests done.

a reply to: Salander
Where do I begin here.

Consumers wanted the WiFi, smartphone and internet access everywhere.

Cigarettes were known and used as a stress reducer.

You say there have been no tests done to see actual harm caused. That is simply not true.

EMF is not just something new that is delivered, now, our nearest star, we call it sun, and the cosmos delivers it 24/7 to us. I am not excluding that 5G or other wireless communications or powerlines can have negative effects.

But you seem to have not really understood what EMF is. It is not a device or new method.

a reply to: Salander


You should watch the movie 30 seconds over Tokyo.
Made in 1943..

One of the pilots preparing to take off went to the ships store and bought ten cartons of guess what?..." Coffin nails"

They knew back then that smokes were dangerous and people didn't care.
Honestly, I think people will feel the same with wifi...not care..

a reply to: Salander

With cigarettes, the knowledge of harm existed, but was basically covered up by the manufacturers.

The same people defending tobacco companies and claiming smoking doesn't cause cancer now defend the big oil companies declaring global warming a myth and that we should all drink oil or whatever.
Literally the same people denying science for profit should raise eyebrows but...

As for the WIFI, it falls into the 'why would a company that wants paying customers also want them to die?' category.
It screams of ultra-conservatives afraid of new fangled technology again, only for those same people to be writing on message boards or making youtube videos while using it, again. 2G, 3G and 4G saw the exact same doom mongers with the exact same arguments.
The actual powers that be hold a nuclear arsenal able to scrub human life from the Earth several times over and, enough viruses and diseases on ice to knock the population down if they wanted to at anytime. To attempt population control through something that's considered overwhelmingly safe, is a little flaky at best.

a reply to: contextual

Wifi and 5g are non ionizing radiation and are safe.
Their dangers are right up there with coffee causing cancer.

As with all science there is evidence leading in every direction.
Vaccines do have some nasty stuff in them. Does that make them dangerous? No

Global warming being man made is the same way.
We get everything from we are killing everything to possible contribution to no effect.
The truth is somewhere in the middle most likely.
To me the environmentalists screaming the sky is falling are just as bad as the people wanting to totally dismiss the research.

years ago there was a man that sued a phone company and manufacturer over his wife dieing from a cancerous tumor on her brain.

there were suppose to be xrays that showed a old style phone with antenna shape tumor. can't find it now but i remember it like it was yesterday because there were two towers one next to where i worked and one just a mile down the road. that people in the area were worried about.

a reply to: Bluntone22

Are you absolutely sure about that?

a reply to: blueman12

Yes

Saved for later..
in the mean time

a reply to: Bluntone22

Any links explaining why?

a reply to: blueman12

Which part?

a reply to: Bluntone22

Wifi and 5g being as safe as a glass of coffee. I honestly don't believe that but im willing to change my mind ic i read unbias studies. Meaning not funded by some wifi or 5g corporation.

originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: 727Sky

If true about falling sperm counts in men, then this would make sense with thee towers everywhere and wifi in every high street!

Wasn't that found to be mostly due to obesity, smoking and alcohol, and to a lesser extent increasing masturbation over porn leading sperm to be less mature due to constant releases? As well as men wearing underwear that was too tight?

a reply to: blueman12

This has nothing to do with corporations.

5g is EM radiation.
Non ionizing and not a new discovery.
There is research all over about that.
Not harmful.

a reply to: Bluntone22

Well corporations do put out their funded bias studies all the time. And i guess i just have to believe you?

It's a fairly new technology and it just seems odd that we are conclusive about there being no health risks.