posted on Jan, 10 2020 @ 11:39 AM
a reply to:
seagull
It's one of the issues around bigfoot that literally turns me into sounding like a crazy person.
You know of course that the PNW grabbed all the attention back in the day for many reasons not the least of which was the Patty Film. However to sit
on & dismiss the entire eastern 1/2 of the US & Canada did irreparable harm to just so many people. It still does today.
Because the eastern localities are dismissed as not being remote enough, have too high a human population that I'm convinced people who would have
come forward don't because they've had it drilled into them it just can't be possible.
So we and the researchers miss out on valuable information.
Plus there is nothing good I can say about making people who've had sightings feel more ostracized than they already do. From where do we get the
nerve? The data is the data whether we like it or not. Ignoring it out of misplaced complacency of the facts as we "think" we know them is arrogance
an QUITE a bit of ego.
I will now attempt some "adulting" an end that happy little rant.
Ok, one last thing. It's well documented that prey animals are happily moving into suburban & urban settings and have been for a long time. They are
doing well with it.
WHAT ON EARTH makes anyone think that Bigfoot won't follow the prey same as coyotes, same as cougars, same as any other predator would? Are you
DAFT??? Did you check your brain at the door?
Like any other predator bigfoot is lazy.
Less energy expended for a meal is survival. They came for the deer, turkey, rats, pets an STAYED for the garbage an roadkill.
But NOPE!
The "Party Line" is they are found in remote inaccessible area's.
None of my hissy-fit is directed at Seagull...it's just me screaming in general.