Time for a negative flag category

I get what you are saying...the board has tuned into a defacto headline of MSM new headlines as opposed to conspiracy topics. I do wish the mods would pilice repetitive threads more...I mean Jeezus its 15 threads on the same subject most dats. Guess the conspiracy world is headed the same way as the Dodo bird. .



a reply to: Bluntone22

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Lysergic

Hey, if it works for how we vote why would it be a bad idea here?

They should, the irony would be hilarious, considering the REEEEaction the left had to it.

I fully support it.

Irony / Hypocrisy whats not to love?

originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: underwerks

Then how about we have a system modeled after the electoral college? Since ATS is mostly pro-Trump the liberal members need to have their negative flags count for 5 or 6 times more than the right wing posters.. That way it evens out.

Ohhh My freeeeaking Gawd!

Here we are talking about a fictional negative flags and you are saying it isn't fair and pro-liberals should get more........

You gotta be kidding me.

This is why people dislike liberals.... 10 Negative flags for you!

Hey, you only get to give one...
And you have one left for the month..

a reply to: Bluntone22

Nah, bro, a terrible idea man.

Wierd, was cranking up Schism as I was writing that. Maybe you can explain that vid....it always freaks me out.



a reply to: toolgal462

originally posted by: lakenheath24
I get what you are saying...the board has tuned into a defacto headline of MSM new headlines as opposed to conspiracy topics. I do wish the mods would pilice repetitive threads more...I mean Jeezus its 15 threads on the same subject most dats. Guess the conspiracy world is headed the same way as the Dodo bird. .



a reply to: Bluntone22

There ya go...

originally posted by: lakenheath24
I get what you are saying...the board has tuned into a defacto headline of MSM new headlines as opposed to conspiracy topics. I do wish the mods would pilice repetitive threads more...I mean Jeezus its 15 threads on the same subject most dats. Guess the conspiracy world is headed the same way as the Dodo bird. .



a reply to: Bluntone22

I don't mind some of the political threads. I actually think there is a lot of conspiracy buried in them. The more you read about it the more you realize it is connected to other things.

originally posted by: solve
a reply to: Bluntone22

Nah, bro, a terrible idea man.

Maybe so..

I guess I'll just resign myself to hammering on the trolls.

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Wierd, was cranking up Schism as I was writing that. Maybe you can explain that vid....it always freaks me out.



a reply to: toolgal462

Far be it for me to explain the mind of Adam Jones....Might have something to do with a trip he took?

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

Could you cry some more please... This is a mixed forum that represent all view points. U only mad because not all think like u

originally posted by: Spacespider

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

Could you cry some more please... This is a mixed forum that represent all view points. U only mad because not all think like u

The mud pit could be exempt from my idea too.

Well, if they do this, I will have to start more threads so I can get the highest negative flag score.

Can I give this thread a negative flag. I think it may qualified.

I think this is a great idea...just like raising taxes to fix global warming!

Give everyone unlimited negative flags so they can downvote anything they disagree with into oblivion.

ATS would implode overnight. There would be zero threads in 'most flagged' and 'recent', and only threads less than 5 minutes old in 'new'.

Awesome idea!

Let's Doooo iiiit!

a reply to: rickymouse

I find it funny that so many hate the idea but would be more than happy to use it now..

Hmmm

I got a better idea.

For $100 USD a mod will delete a thread for you.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Well as has been discussed, you don't get unlimited down votes.

10% cut to use my idea.

a reply to: Lysergic

Pay to play?

a reply to: Bluntone22

You sound just like a crooked politician. Silence any speech you don't personally approve of, because you of course are never wrong and others are not cool like you are.

You have the option, of course, to only participate in the topics you wish to participate in. If you don't like a thread, cast your vote by not reading it or posting in it. It's just like changing the channel on a TV, you decide what you read or write here. No need to pull the other channels off the air. Learn to use your remote more wisely.

So what you are saying is that you want the ability to not read some threads?
Hmmm....Granted.

Now you don’t have to read any thread you don’t open up and read. In my time here there are entire forums that no longer exist that I never read the majority of threads in them. You just have to look at the title, and decide whether you want to open and read it. You can even open and see who the OP is and decide not to read it. And if you or no one else replies, it sinks into oblivion for inactivity, part of the background noise.