Time for a negative flag category

a reply to: Bluntone22

After ten or fifteen negative flags the thread automatically goes to the trash bin.

Too bad that isn't active for this thread! jk

I have to add to this, a member only get's 2 of the negative flags a month...

a reply to: dogstar23

So several people don't like the idea but if they had the option they would use them....

Is that what you are saying?

originally posted by: Bluntone22
We need a negative flag option.
After ten or fifteen negative flags the thread automatically goes to the trash bin.

Of course one positive flag would negate a negative one.

25 flags with 10 negative and the author gets credit for 25....

25 negative flags with 10 positive and the author gets nothing but the trash bin.

They would all go in the trash bin. Can't believe I agree with underwear on this one.

a reply to: toolgal462

Then like jagstorm said above, you get two a month or one a week.

That would eliminate gang mentality

Well i wouldbe immune! lol


How bout we get an Eva Braun emoji burning a book insteAD?

a reply to: Bluntone22

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: toolgal462

Then like jagstorm said above, you get two a month or one a week.

That would eliminate gang mentality

but I would make like 100 puppets, and have them all on different ips.

^_^

Army of ONE

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

Not at all.
There just needs to be a limit.

I've played online video games where you can downvote other players for bad language or sportsmanship.
But you have a limited number so you can't just flame people all day.

and then

I'd make a macro.

I believe peeps in my latest thread call it personal accountability. LOL




a reply to: Bluntone22

nah...what the board needs is a "block user" function. Then we never need to see the nonsense certain posters repeatedly post in the first place.

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

You project what your side would do .

U a weapons chick?




a reply to: toolgal462

a reply to: lakenheath24

I'm not claiming I'm right about this one but nobody can deny there is a lot of garbage being posted now.
Apparently the authors don't have much personal accountability.

Honestly I liked the ignore, not for me to ignore, but so the perpetually butthurt could ignore me, so I wouldn't ever have to read their whiney replies to my replies.

originally posted by: lakenheath24
U a weapons chick?




a reply to: toolgal462

Nope, a fan of the band Tool.

originally posted by: Bluntone22

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

Not at all.
There just needs to be a limit.

I've played online video games where you can downvote other players for bad language or sportsmanship.
But you have a limited number so you can't just flame people all day.

Then how about we have a system modeled after the electoral college? Since ATS is mostly pro-Trump the liberal members need to have their negative flags count for 5 or 6 times more than the right wing posters..

That way it evens out.

a reply to: underwerks

Salt overload.

originally posted by: underwerks

originally posted by: Bluntone22

originally posted by: underwerks
a reply to: Bluntone22

This forum would be entirely one sided at that point. Any thread critical of Donald Trump would be trashed instantly.

Unless that's what you want by suggesting this...

Not at all.
There just needs to be a limit.

I've played online video games where you can downvote other players for bad language or sportsmanship.
But you have a limited number so you can't just flame people all day.

Then how about we have a system modeled after the electoral college? Since ATS is mostly pro-Trump the liberal members need to have their negative flags count for 5 or 6 times more than the right wing posters..

Thay way it evens out.

I would say ok but liberals want to get rid of the electoral college so we should lead by example.

a reply to: Lysergic

Hey, if it works for how we vote why would it be a bad idea here?

a reply to: underwerks

Then how about we have a system modeled after the electoral college? Since ATS is mostly pro-Trump the liberal members need to have their negative flags count for 5 or 6 times more than the right wing posters.. That way it evens out.

Ohhh My freeeeaking Gawd!

Here we are talking about a fictional negative flags and you are saying it isn't fair and pro-liberals should get more........

You gotta be kidding me.

This is why people dislike liberals.... 10 Negative flags for you!