It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
My answers were not bad, they were valid.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
Interesting... I like these 8 bit songs because they have a strong melody.
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
My answers were not bad, they were valid.
No they are not, just full of it. That's all you can spout
Be technical, i told you that so many times
You can't just post some ambiguous answer that could relate to anything in this world even some dog on the street
Be specific and technical, or admit you don't know
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
My answers were not bad, they were valid.
No they are not, just full of it. That's all you can spout
Be technical, i told you that so many times
You can't just post some ambiguous answer that could relate to anything in this world even some dog on the street
Be specific and technical, or admit you don't know
If you are going to be so demanding of me, then it only is fair that I be demanding of you for answers from me.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: galadofwarthethird
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
If animals and meat and sex were all created as part of the matrix? What would be the point in being trapped by something that does not exist?
They trqp your energies in the matrix to power it.
But if your the matrix, and sustaining it with your energies. Then how is it, that its trapping you? More like your just to lazy to log off.
Because source players have become trapped into the lower frequency experiences that drain energy from them. They became trapped with things like meat eating and orgasm, which took energy away from them and prevented them from reaching their full potential.
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
Interesting... I like these 8 bit songs because they have a strong melody.
A song can't be '8 bit', that's not how bits work
Once again you display a giant amount of ignorance about how things work
What makes that song 8-bit? Can you explain? How it sounds? The number of frames on the song?
The number of beats per second? Maybe it's 4x4 or 2x2 or what?
If a song is 8-bit, does it also means we can call it a 'byte song'?
Chiptune, also known as chip music or 8-bit music
originally posted by: galadofwarthethird
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: galadofwarthethird
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
If animals and meat and sex were all created as part of the matrix? What would be the point in being trapped by something that does not exist?
They trqp your energies in the matrix to power it.
But if your the matrix, and sustaining it with your energies. Then how is it, that its trapping you? More like your just to lazy to log off.
Because source players have become trapped into the lower frequency experiences that drain energy from them. They became trapped with things like meat eating and orgasm, which took energy away from them and prevented them from reaching their full potential.
Do not be ridiculous. Does the brain lose energy, because it grows a toenail?
Lower frequencies are not for source players. There for toenails.
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
My answers were not bad, they were valid.
No they are not, just full of it. That's all you can spout
Be technical, i told you that so many times
You can't just post some ambiguous answer that could relate to anything in this world even some dog on the street
Be specific and technical, or admit you don't know
If you are going to be so demanding of me, then it only is fair that I be demanding of you for answers from me.
You posted the claims,
I already told you that if i wanted to discuss the concepts i would talk to Judy, i gave you questions that will prove your claims
Answer The Questions
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: galadofwarthethird
Interesting... I like these 8 bit songs because they have a strong melody.
A song can't be '8 bit', that's not how bits work
Once again you display a giant amount of ignorance about how things work
What makes that song 8-bit? Can you explain? How it sounds? The number of frames on the song?
The number of beats per second? Maybe it's 4x4 or 2x2 or what?
If a song is 8-bit, does it also means we can call it a 'byte song'?
Let's look at this:
Chiptune, also known as chip music or 8-bit music
en.wikipedia.org...
Case settled.
You want to keep pushing that I am wrong about everything I say.
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
originally posted by: Malisa
originally posted by: SourceTruth
a reply to: Malisa
Out of all of your posts, you have not made the answer to this clear.
Why do you think that Quartz Crystal is wrong? Put aside all of your ad hominem personal attacks against her, tell me why she is wrong about what she is saying.
I made more sense in one single post than you in the entire web with all your cross posting and lame attempts to sound smart
I'm still waiting for answers, for the questions i gave you
Like i said, you wanted to discuss the Source Truth stuff, so i gave you actual questions about it, but clearly you don't have a clue. Yet you are trying to preach about things you don't understand at all
And again, for the third time, prove me wrong, shame me in front of everyone with actual answers and not just dumb rhetoric that gives you time to side track or derail with someone else's replies
I am still waiting for answers to the questions that I give you.
You call yourself making sense? You don't have any idea what sense or logic is. You don't have any arguments, all that you have is personal attacks.
Answer my questions then
Answer them and prove me wrong
That's all i need to do, so you expose the fakeness of it all
Your questions were just "What is the physical mechanism for this?"
What you fail to understand is that mechanisms are part of physicality, which is only a part of the matrix. You can't explain the matrix itself by describing a mechanism for it in the same way that you would describe the mechanism for a physical object that exists within the matrix.
The mechanism is of a non physical nature. It is the mechanism of creating something physical, which is experience of reality. This is done with something called energy.
The young lady asked some very valid questions. It's a shame that you didn't answer them, could have opened an avenue to something interesting.
I suppose it's ok that you don't have the answers, if you don't know, you don't know.
You could have stated that you don't know and kind of surmised some kind of answers, y'know, "maybe this, maybe that". It's kinda cool doing that.
Think I might try answering Malisa's questions some time tomorrow, I've been drinking and bed it calling right now.
I did indeed answer her questions, but the problem is that people like you and her only see what they want to see. They will not see an answer to their questions because in their mind then I am wrong about everything.
Wasn't really an answer though, more a side step.
I want to see some imagination. I want some meat on the bone.
My answers were not bad, they were valid.
No they are not, just full of it. That's all you can spout
Be technical, i told you that so many times
You can't just post some ambiguous answer that could relate to anything in this world even some dog on the street
Be specific and technical, or admit you don't know
If you are going to be so demanding of me, then it only is fair that I be demanding of you for answers from me.
You posted the claims,
I already told you that if i wanted to discuss the concepts i would talk to Judy, i gave you questions that will prove your claims
Answer The Questions
If you want to discuss the concepts, then you discuss it on this thread that I made about them.
I explained the claims that were made by Quartz Crystal, these are not my claims, but I am in agreement with the claims made.
originally posted by: galadofwarthethird
a reply to: Malisa
Oh my bad Melisa. Kind of just reached this page. But it does look like one long and drawn out scruple between couples that have reached that two year mark.
Just saying.
Will go watch some turtle videos, come back later see if there is a end to this story, maybe. Like all things online and on ATS, its way over drawn out.
I would like to ask anyone to refrain from replying until this person answers these questions, can you guys support me on this please?
You claimed knowledge about the Matrix and claimed to have answers and came here promoting those answers.