-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -§19§-

Q post 3418 said to Watch New York and California...and ends with...

WATCH NYC
News unlocks
5:5?
Q

What city was Epstein arrested in?
NYC?
5:5?
Watch CA.
Q

Then yesterday, on August 15th, 2019,, New York Post article stated "Jeffrey Epstein’s former gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell isn’t holed up in her British manor or summering on the Massachusetts coast. The Post found the socialite hiding in plain sight in the least likely place imaginable — a fast-food joint in Los Angeles."

[url=http://]https://nypost.com/2019/08/15/jeffrey-epsteins-gal-pal-ghislaine-maxwell-spotted-at-in-n-out-burger-in-first-photos-since-his-death/[/url ]

Source, qmap.pub and "Jeffrey Epstein’s gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell spotted at In-N-Out Burger in first photos since his death" By Sara Nathan and Mara Siegler August 15, 2019 | 4:06pm

I wonder how Maxwell got to the burger joint? Did she walk there? Is she staying somewhere near by? Did she drive or take a cab? She does have a pilots license and Im guessing there are some connections that may still be helping her. Would be easy enough to fly down from Oregon or back to. I suppose that could be made up as a location also yes?
Was that lady in the photo actually a double or stand in? Lot of Actress's in California.

One other thing I noticed about the picture was that the people or guys that were at the table behind her left shoulder changed out, but the Lady behind her right shoulder remained the same. None of them seemed very interested in what was going on at Maxwells table. So the make up change or cleanup freshen up had to happen relativity quickly. Just seems like some things are a little surreal with that whole setup. At first I thought maybe the single guy after the first two left might have been trying to catch it on his cell phone. Still up in the air about that one.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Even if that was Combetta's junk account, he had ALL of Clinton's emails and classified stuff. Does he have the correct security clearance for that and has undergone the appropriate background checks?

It doesn't matter because this cover story is bogus. If it were true, Combetta would have told authorities about it while questioned as he would have immunity granted to him by the Obama DOJ.

They came up with this reason waaaay after the fact when it was reported on to Congress.

Since he didn't disclose that, immunity doesn't extend to intentional omissions, right?

a reply to: pheonix358

Re Epstein NY mansion, it would be useful, if anyone has access to building regs databases, to do a search of any historical architectural diagrams showing layout and any tunnels.

a reply to: 2knew2know

Last Part of 3418:
What city was Epstein arrested in?
NYC?
5:5?
Watch CA.
Q

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: pheonix358

Re Epstein NY mansion, it would be useful, if anyone has access to building regs databases, to do a search of any historical architectural diagrams showing layout and any tunnels.

You should be able to look at the property tax records. At least here in MI that is where data for building and improvement permits show up and it's a public record.

Once Barr/Durham start squeezing Tier II & III bad actors, Tier I peeps become heavily at risk.

Hopefully some squeezing has been underway.

DECLAS is dangerous to FBI/DOJ if they fail to hold people (right people) accountable. If the public can read with their own eyes what was going on and nothing is done; what little remaining faith/hope in justice system will fade away.

a reply to: Diaspar

Yikes if that is actually her, that's stupidly crazy.
So being a serial sexual predator of teenage girls and pimping them out to the Elites of the world is ok if it's ok for intelligence agencies?

Scary thing is.......he probably was an intelligence tool. Those young girls were just collateral damage.
Lord knows what other depraved things he did.

We have to get the whole dirty story out in the open.

a reply to: onehuman

Also, in this pic, take a look at the gap between her left arm and the umbrella, and then take a hard look at everything else surrounding her. Whatever is in that gap, DOES NOT fit into the rest of the pic. Could just be a weird trick I guess, but I am having trouble reconciling what it is that is behind her, if this is not shopped.

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex

MBSC, I just did a Q post search of "key" and found Q3354, which is well worth a re-read at this point as it points to TOMORROW, August 17th!!

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 72efc4 No.6954607 📁
Jul 8 2019 17:08:02 (EST)
Anonymous ID: bc9ab2 No.6954435 📁
Jul 8 2019 16:59:53 (EST)
TheStorm.jpg
⬇
>>6954422
>>6954435
Just because the 'public' is unaware of something, does not mean 'nothing' is happening.
MUELLER hearing a tactic meant to delay (H) report?
(H) report release necessary prior to [C]omey release?
(H) + [C] = D
D = the start of the mass awakening (WH, ABCs, State, Foreign, ……)
Post D comes many I's.
When BLACKMAIL no longer holds due to LOSS OF SENIOR LEVEL KEY GOV POSITIONS AND 11th HOUR TESTIMONY…………those previously protected become prey.
HUNTERS BECOME THE HUNTED.
GOD WINS.
Q

To me this is saying:

1st = (H)illary Clinton Information release (because rounded brackets, not square),
2nd = [C]omey report
3rd = = D - either means DECLAS or death? (It's not in brackets!)
4th = Mass Awakening as result of DECLAS or death,
5th = Post D comes many I's


This last line needs more analysis because:

a) IF I was investigations THEN the correct grammar would be:

"Post D come many Is."
instead of
"Post D comes many I's."

b) The s on the end of "comes" means the following noun should be SINGULAR... and the 's also makes "many I" singular!

c) could this mean "Many I.'s" testimony?

do we have any known candidates for Many/Manny I.?
Sounds like an Indian or Pakistani name?

Either way, we have another reinforcement of August 17th being important!

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: onehuman

Also, in this pic, take a look at the gap between her left arm and the umbrella, and then take a hard look at everything else surrounding her. Whatever is in that gap, DOES NOT fit into the rest of the pic. Could just be a weird trick I guess, but I am having trouble reconciling what it is that is behind her, if this is not shopped.

Glasses Pic or Cleaned up pic? Just so I dont waste time studying the wrong one unless you mean both. I have been looking at both trying to figure out what you are seeing or not seeing I guess I should say

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I was only thinking last night... how long ago were we told to "Be Ready"? 0311Warrior reinforced it too. Now you!

...but no one's saying HOW to be ready!

Whilst I'm posting... does anyone else think that a Sep 5th testimony by 8chan's Jim Watkins would be a great lead in to a Full DECLAS on 9/11... on Sep 11th?

I guess expect the unexpected.

Friday Sept 13, 2019 is Full Moon.


At the end of the Jack Vorhies (Google Whistleblower) interview on infowars, he said Google took down the Arabic definition of 'Covfefe' right after Trump's tweet. He said this was the last straw for him knowing that Google would do anything to win. He went on to say the AI went in and scrubbed the translation twice. Then pushed the 25th ammendment for 'crazy' Trump. It took 2+ years for us to be proven right! Covfefe means 'I Will Stand up.'
dailycaller.com...


twitter.com...


Deleted tweet:

a reply to: onehuman

The one without glasses, where she looks like shes posing for the camera.

a reply to: MindBodySpiritComplex

MBSC, I note that the 2 sails look like OWLS on the crown of HMS Thule Arms !

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Here is a start for the building and a NYC database entry, but i'm getting visitors over. So I doubt if I can find more at the moment...

9 East 71st Street
Construction Date: 1930
Architect / Builder: Horace Trumbauer
Owner / Developer: Herbert N. Straus
Major Alteration(s): None
Alteration Architect(s): None
Style(s): neo-French Classic
Material(s): Stone

Building Type: Residential Structure
Original Use: Residential
Tax Block: 1386 Tax Lot: 10

NYC Department of Buildings Property Profile Overview

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I always read that as the I's stood for Indictments. If there has already been Grand Jury hearings those could be having the 11th hour Testimonies. We know Hearings have been going on behind the scenes.

How are you reaching the 17th with this one? That part I am missing.

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

I was only thinking last night... how long ago were we told to "Be Ready"? 0311Warrior reinforced it too. Now you!

...but no one's saying HOW to be ready!

Whilst I'm posting... does anyone else think that a Sep 5th testimony by 8chan's Jim Watkins would be a great lead in to a Full DECLAS on 9/11... on Sep 11th?

I guess expect the unexpected.

Friday Sept 13, 2019 is Full Moon.

 

At the end of the Jack Vorhies (Google Whistleblower) interview on infowars, he said Google took down the Arabic definition of 'Covfefe' right after Trump's tweet. He said this was the last straw for him knowing that Google would do anything to win. He went on to say the AI went in and scrubbed the translation twice. Then pushed the 25th ammendment for 'crazy' Trump. It took 2+ years for us to be proven right! Covfefe means 'I Will Stand up.'
dailycaller.com...

twitter.com...


Deleted tweet:

Tally Ho!



The Redcoats are losing

a reply to: SilentWindofDoom

The other thing that hit me about the Russian plane crash is that the plane would have been full of fuel if it had just taken off... but no fire?

It's rational that the landing gear was up if it had just taken off, lifted gear but didn't have time to put it back down before crash landing.

Also, I haven't seen any filming of people leaving the aircraft, which is odd!

a reply to: Diaspar

Re "My wife and I"... I think Ghislane is lesbian like Hillary and therefore "My wife and I" would make sense?

Who could be her wife? Ray Chandler?

Ghislane doesn't have any kids and never been married? Epstein wouldn't marry her? Was that just a cover story?

a reply to: dashen

Doh, didn't 'expect' that!

Outstanding!!