The true origins of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. A Yahoo News investigation.

a reply to: Liquesence

Its very important that certain words and phrases are echoed so that denial can be continued.
witch hunt, hoax , conflicted players, everybody is in everybody's pocket, all the fine points of any good conspiracy.

This one is dead. They just need time to mourn.

a reply to: Sillyolme

So what? It was investigated and no one was guilty

But can play that game too

It’s my claim the dnc conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 election

Hillary hired people to pee on a bed, podesta had meetings with Russians where he brokered the deal to steel the election, they hired fusion gps who worked with Russian lawyers, they paid Steele who got garbage dirt on trump

Now if I just post contacts between people connected to the dnc and Russians, that proves it is viable

Start the investigation, right?

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

We shall see if it was legal

It was a Russian sourced conspiracy theory that wasn’t true

It was legally sourced based on valid Intel and hasn't been proved otherwise (and likely won't) unlike the Rich conspiracy, which has been shown to be Russian BS.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Liquesence

Its very important that certain words and phrases are echoed so that denial can be continued.
witch hunt, hoax , conflicted players, everybody is in everybody's pocket, all the fine points of any good conspiracy.

This one is dead. They just need time to mourn.

That's what propagandists do: Create catch words and phrases that are *echoed* over and over. Propaganda.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Liquesence

Its very important that certain words and phrases are echoed so that denial can be continued.
witch hunt, hoax , conflicted players, everybody is in everybody's pocket, all the fine points of any good conspiracy.

This one is dead. They just need time to mourn.

Your Russian hoax is dead, and your man mueller killed it

You saying but there were contacts is irrelevant

Contacts aren’t a crime

You have no right to criticize anyone for believing a conspiracy theory

You pushed the Russia one for two years, and still push it after it was debunked

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

You're gonna have to go back to the origins of the story planted on 4chan. I don't go to that toilet of a site.
I would have thought that the bulletin would be something you guys already saw and believed to be real.
Personally I never saw any but I do not go chasing every rainbow you guys offer up as a source either.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

We shall see if it was legal

It was a Russian sourced conspiracy theory that wasn’t true

It was legally sourced based on valid Intel and hasn't been proved otherwise (and likely won't) unlike the Rich conspiracy, which has been shown to be Russian BS.

Show me where the Seth rich story has been proven to be bs

Was their a two year independent council that investigated it and said so?

Oh no, that was your Russian collusion conspiracy

wow, even the table of contents shows Trump went to Russia in 2013 and 2014

it's gotta be a Russian driven election

(2013-2014) was President Trump even in the GOP then??

Does anyone know? he must have right.

Oh wait he was with the Democrats.

(lets stick to the facts folks)

So President Trump went to Moscow as a Democrat, and was a supporter of the Clintons

Goodness Sillyolme you are correct

the Democrats Colluded with Russia and President Trump got Pissed and Ran against Hillary clinton and won

We dodged that bullet...........

a reply to: Liquesence

Bruce Ohr testified the "dossier" was a problem and so were the warrants.

😎

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Liquesence

Its very important that certain words and phrases are echoed so that denial can be continued.
witch hunt, hoax , conflicted players, everybody is in everybody's pocket, all the fine points of any good conspiracy.

This one is dead. They just need time to mourn.

That's what propagandists do: Create catch words and phrases that are *echoed* over and over. Propaganda.

Propagandist continue to believe a conspiracy theory after it was investigated for two years and proven to be wrong

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Liquesence

Its very important that certain words and phrases are echoed so that denial can be continued.
witch hunt, hoax , conflicted players, everybody is in everybody's pocket, all the fine points of any good conspiracy.

This one is dead. They just need time to mourn.

That's what propagandists do: Create catch words and phrases that are *echoed* over and over. Propaganda.

Propagandist continue to believe a conspiracy theory after it was investigated for two years and proven to be wrong

Propagandists believe there was nothing there and it's a "witch hunt" when after an investigation the facts show the contrary.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Liquesence

Bruce Ohr testified the "dossier" was a problem and so were the warrants.

😎

Of course it's a problem...for Trump etc.

Thanks for playing.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

We shall see if it was legal

It was a Russian sourced conspiracy theory that wasn’t true

It was legally sourced based on valid Intel and hasn't been proved otherwise (and likely won't) unlike the Rich conspiracy, which has been shown to be Russian BS.

Show me where the Seth rich story has been proven to be bs

Was their a two year independent council that investigated it and said so?

Oh no, that was your Russian collusion conspiracy

The op.

a reply to: Grambler

Contacts with this many Russians unless you are a russian is highly unusual and every one of these contacts was denied by the campaign. Every person who had these meetings or phone calls or contacts lied and denied they occurred. Where are your conspiracy hackles when you need them?
You go ahead and justify that whatever way you need to to get it to fit your theories.
Read the damn report because you really have no argument until you get this info under your belt.
The reasons are all there. All the dirty details.

Oh boi, here come the resident trolls. lol

a reply to: Grambler

It was just shown to you but you refuse to absorb it.

Sorry but this is all on you now.

Its over.

The story is dead.

It was made up by Russians to help trump get elected.
That is what they did. They helped the incompetent trump win so they could control him.
They got him elected. With crap like this made up story which was unbelievable and ridiculous from the start.

a reply to: thedigirati

He did go to Russia for the Miss Universe contest. Thats a verifiable fact.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

We shall see if it was legal

It was a Russian sourced conspiracy theory that wasn’t true

It was legally sourced based on valid Intel and hasn't been proved otherwise (and likely won't) unlike the Rich conspiracy, which has been shown to be Russian BS.

Show me where the Seth rich story has been proven to be bs

Was their a two year independent council that investigated it and said so?

Oh no, that was your Russian collusion conspiracy

The op.

O
That’s not responsive

Quote the parts of the op that show an investigation occurred and their is no proof of the allegations


Because I can do that with your Russian collusion conspiracy

a reply to: Sillyolme

Addendum:
We had no contacts at all period, we're innocent.
Ok we had contacts but we we didn't discuss anything, so what?
Ok, we discussed things but it wasn't serious.
Ok, yeah we discussed dirt on Hillary, so what?
Ok, yeah they gave us this and we said "What else you got?"
Ok, they gave us dirt and we took all we could but that's not a crime!

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

We shall see if it was legal

It was a Russian sourced conspiracy theory that wasn’t true

It was legally sourced based on valid Intel and hasn't been proved otherwise (and likely won't) unlike the Rich conspiracy, which has been shown to be Russian BS.

Show me where the Seth rich story has been proven to be bs

Was their a two year independent council that investigated it and said so?

Oh no, that was your Russian collusion conspiracy

The op.

O
That’s not responsive

Quote the parts of the op that show an investigation occurred and their is no proof of the allegations


Because I can do that with your Russian collusion conspiracy

Read the article.