The true origins of the Seth Rich conspiracy theory. A Yahoo News investigation.

a reply to: Grambler

But they did meet. They did talk.. Russia did influence the election to help trump and hurt Hillary.
And the trump campaign knew that they were doing it and were okay with it.
They didnt prove conspiracy because a lot of records were locked up in europe or was deleted or destroyed by campaign members. You'd know that if you read the report but nothing you say supports what you claim about having read it. Maybe you skimmed it. I cant say but from what you post you sure wouldnt pass any test on contents.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

You're an alarmist. No one cares.

So case closed? That's it? Everyone go home because Liquesence solved this case from a Yahoo article.

Yup, that's it.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Its not my claim dude. Go hunt for it if its so important to you.
I knew the story was bullschitte from the beginning so I would not be the one chasing that rainbow.
I would not have cared any more then than I do now.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Meeting and talking isn’t a crime!

And I posted many examples of Hillary’s team meeting am talking with Russians. Why don’t you assume their guilt?

And we know Russians did influence the election and presidency in the most effective way by... giving out false information to Steele for his dossier!

a reply to: Grambler

No I am not and stop bringing up the dossier which has nothing to do with this.
You are constantly trying to change the subject because you know the Seth Rich story is bull.
Man up dude. Admit you were wrong. Gain some respect.
At least when I am wrong I admit it and apologize for it.
You change the subject and try to discredit me when I am not source for any of this.
Its childish.

a reply to: xuenchen

see above.

a reply to: thedigirati

Why don't you tell us why you keep bringing up a moot point.
Its public. Its done... Can't unring a bell. Get over it.

It doesn't change what the report contains.

and I think you are wrong anyway. I never saw anything that said what you claim.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

I seemed to have missed that in report. I honestly do not recall seeing Christopher Steele or the dossier mentioned at all.

It definitely wasn't mentioned in anything regarding the OP.

Hence the attempted derail.

They don't want to talk about the article or what it found. They want to deflect.

It’s not an attempt to derail

The man who wrote the article in the op was the man who worked with Steele and was cited in the fisa warrant against carter page

The *information* is the point.


The FISA warrant was legal and founded. The dossier was founded on valid intel.

The Rich conspiracy was not.

*Sigh*

FALSE.

Barrs investigation is currently assessing FISA abuse, have you been living under a rock?

Secondly, the first part of your OP is "Alledge", so even the author of the OPINION Piece doesn't really know, rather draw conclusions.

Mind you, this is the guy who worked with steel on the now discredited dossier.

It's comical to see you push this as fact and say I "Told you so" and if we rebuff, then somehow we're simply "Trolls".

Nope, get over yourself, you're simply wrong and were DUPED into fake news as usual, by a Yahoo article of all things, why drag yourself through crap?

Lol, smh.

a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Well there you go folks.

Nothing more for me to say.

I am so done with this crew.

a reply to: Sillyolme

FALSE.

If the author has anything to do with the Dossier, which is discredited, than by that same token, his other works are also discredited.

You can't pick and choose. Doesn't work that way.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BuckyWunderlick

Well there you go folks.

Nothing more for me to say.

I am so done with this crew.

Good, laters and don't let the door hit you on the way out.

originally posted by: Sillyolme

Well there you go folks.

Nothing more for me to say.

I am so done with this crew.

catchya!

So let me get this right..

Yahoo NEWS!!!... the same Yahoo News that Peter Strzok and Mccabe used to leak a false story about Trump and Russia that they later used as evidence for a FISA...

That Yahoo News.... and CNN..... suddenly declare... after all these years.... that it was Russia flaming discord and rumoring the Seth Rich / DNC retribution Story..

No mention of the data transfer rate that suggests a USB local copy
No mention of Kim Dot Com saying he has evidence Seth stole the documents and leaked them to Wikileaks
No mention of the leaked tools showing the CIA can leave footprints of other nations durings its own hacks
No mention Seth was alive, talking and stable when he arrived at the hospital
No mention of Podesta saying he approved of making an example of leakers..

Lunacy!!...

CNN and Yahoo News released this because when real questions get asked about the Seth Investigation, those guilty can claim its just another Trump / Russia connection.

What happens when Clintons Email Server being wiped suddenly becomes another Russia rumor

a reply to: Agit8dChop

I think the establishment figures the best way to cover up everything is to saturate the airwaves with all things Russian.

It stinks and anyone falling for that BS needs to be called out.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

But they did meet. They did talk.. Russia did influence the election to help trump and hurt Hillary.
And the trump campaign knew that they were doing it and were okay with it.
They didnt prove conspiracy because a lot of records were locked up in europe or was deleted or destroyed by campaign members.

Ok you made this claim before, I question the veracity of these claims in the report

how much influence was it, exactly?

How do you know what was deleted (like with a cloth?)

what records were locked up specifically (IE: which countries)

Feel free to quote the report line by line.

you made the claim.

Nah buddy. The Clintons had bonfides bodies attached to their names, and this when the internet was run by angelfire and geocities.

Could some of the names be fake and/or made up? Certainty, it is easy to have someone die under natural circumstances (sickness for one or an accident) and then point the finger later.

But to broad stroke it all? ATS has a few threads, one that subject.

Clintons be bodyin people. Keep your mouth shut and get paid, that's the plan.

Get in, get your credentials, (like strips for the military. and you also have to kiss the ring from time to time) get paid, get out. Stick to that and your good.

Run your mouth and eh... things happen. I'm not saying they out here in bushes straight OJin people, but uh. You can get missin.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thedigirati
Why don't you tell us why you keep bringing up a moot point.
Its public. Its done... Can't unring a bell. Get over it.
It doesn't change what the report contains.
and I think you are wrong anyway. I never saw anything that said what you claim.

it was shown that the report was for AG barr and no one else, and you replied to that post, so now you are outright lying.

the reason it is important to note is because of the way the report was written, with innuendo, and supposition.

Barr released it because the Democrats were going to anyway ( illegally ) the second part of the report is not as factual as the first part.

Barr outsmarted them be relasing all of it not just the first part, like the Meuller team thought.

that is why it's Very important to use ALL the facts ma'am, or don't you like Facts, even if they are inconvient to you?

Seth Rich died, that is a fact, How he died was a gunshot wound, that is a Fact. anything else is suposition,and that is also a fact.

a reply to: Sillyolme

First I never defended the Seth rich story

I don’t know if it’s true or not

As of now, I see no proof of it being true, and this don’t really discuss it

My point was that the author of this story “debunking” it is the same author that pushed the lie that was the dossier, and his reporting was used to help get a fisa warrant

That is relevant to this op

And no you don’t admit when you are wrong

Hence you defending the criminal Russia collusion narrative that was debunked by mueller

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

No I am not and stop bringing up the dossier which has nothing to do with this.
You are constantly trying to change the subject because you know the Seth Rich story is bull.
Man up dude. Admit you were wrong. Gain some respect.
At least when I am wrong I admit it and apologize for it.
You change the subject and try to discredit me when I am not source for any of this.
Its childish.

LOL, How Biden recently said Russia would not interfere in an election in his watch! How was VP when the election occurred, therefore on his watch. Russian conspiracy is dead period he admitted it would not happen on his watch. Now admit you are wrong.

Yahoo news is chalk full of carp they leave out FACTS! Explain the 187 Seth Rich ms13 file found on Debbie's laptop that she grilled the Washington police chief over! NO COLLUSION. Because Joe said so! Waiting for your admittance of being wrong now!