Jackson was and is (most likely) innocent.

a reply to: 3n19m470

True that it is very common. I remember seeing kids, when I was a kid, doing strange adult things, mostly for attention. I'm sure alot of it was just kids mimicking what they see from like porn material and movies.

In the middle of eating but coming back to watch this video later.
Really hard for me to not feel sick while seeing him with kids.

a reply to: lucidclouds

Maybe you won't after watching the videos in the opening post.

a reply to: lucidclouds

Did you watch 'Leaving Neverland'?

a reply to: Mach2

XD Or that he didn't duel people.

originally posted by: jaymp
a reply to: Mach2

XD Or that he didn't duel people.

Explain your post, please...in detail.

This video is not defending Michael Jackson......it is about denying ignorance..... and seeking the truth.

Newspapers in the UK are running stories about how Wade Robsons mother contradicted Wades testimony in the docudrama.

"Michael Jackson abuse claims disproved by victim Wade Robson's own Mum"

Has anyone ever heard if propaganda and manipulation?

Here is an excellent video that everyone should see:


It is pretty interesting what is said about black people and how hip hop is now made by white people.

Told ya. People believe what they want to believe and they don't want their minds changed.

a reply to: toolgal462

The way a human mind works has been studied and it is known by the mass manipulators how to control people...... unfortuneatly most people do not realise that the media is controlling them.

When a court of law is no longer believed...... then we just have anarchy.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I agree we have a big problem. Schools don't teach anymore, they are indoctrination centers.

The more I learn about the history of MJ and his 4 accusers, the more I think MJ was innocent.

But not a single person chiming in on this thread who believes he was a pedo cares to investigate further than the tabloid medias repeated claim that he slept with boys.

That's it. That's all they need to hear to make up their minds. I think it's terrible because as you can see, you can't even get one of them to watch the videos posted in Michael's defense.

They believe what they want to believe.

a reply to: toolgal462

They may have watched the rebuttals...... do you really believe that they would return to this thread and say... 'You know what... I think I was wrong to believe the Wade family'?

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: toolgal462

They may have watched the rebuttals...... do you really believe that they would return to this thread and say... 'You know what... I think I was wrong to believe the Wade family'?

Sure they would if they actually watched. They would show up and say, either "I watched and still think he was a pedo" or they would say, "I watched and maybe he wasn't a pedo".

Since no one has come back to say either, I stand by my claim that they believe what they want and don't want their minds changed.

a reply to: toolgal462
It is a sad world where only one side has to be heard and people make a judgement......based on no real evidence.

a reply to: Itisnowagain
Yah, they wont care until it happens to them or someone that they care about.

a reply to: toolgal462

I believe that the makers of that docudrama will be fined.
And the families involved will be done for purgery.

Or maybe there will be more suicides.

a reply to: InTheLight

owlcation.com...

www.history.com...

On this day in 1806, future President Andrew Jackson kills a man who accused him of cheating on a horse race bet and then insulted his wife, Rachel.

Contemporaries described Jackson, who had already served in Tennessee’s Senate and was practicing law at the time of the duel, as argumentative, physically violent and fond of dueling to solve conflicts. Estimates of the number of duels in which Jackson participated ranged from five to 100.

Jackson and Dickinson were rival horse breeders and southern plantation owners with a long-standing hatred of each other. Dickinson accused Jackson of reneging on a horse bet, calling Jackson a coward and an equivocator. Dickinson also called Rachel Jackson a bigamist. (Rachel had married Jackson not knowing her first husband had failed to finalize their divorce.) After the insult to Rachel and a statement published in the National Review in which Dickinson called Jackson a worthless scoundrel and, again, a coward, Jackson challenged Dickinson to a duel.

On May 30, 1806, Jackson and Dickinson met at Harrison’s Mills on the Red River in Logan, Kentucky. At the first signal from their seconds, Dickinson fired. Jackson received Dickinson’s first bullet in the chest next to his heart. Jackson put his hand over the wound to staunch the flow of blood and stayed standing long enough to fire his gun. Dickinson’s seconds claimed Jackson’s first shot misfired, which would have meant the duel was over, but, in a breach of etiquette, Jackson re-cocked the gun and shot again, this time killing his opponent. Although Jackson recovered, he suffered chronic pain from the wound for the remainder of his life.
ADVERTISEMENT

Jackson was not prosecuted for murder, and the duel had very little effect on his successful campaign for the presidency in 1829. Many American men in the early 1800s, particularly in the South, viewed dueling as a time-honored tradition. In 1804, Thomas Jefferson’s vice president Aaron Burr had also avoided murder charges after killing former Treasury secretary and founding father Alexander Hamilton in a duel. In fact, Rachel’s divorce raised more of a scandal in the press and in parlors than the killing of Dickinson.

Michael Jackson is innocent.
There is no proof that he isn't!

originally posted by: Iconic
The sheer volume of people calling for his name to be continuously dragged through the dirt is pretty amazing. I'm not someone who is blind to the idea that there are plenty of weirdos and ne'erdowells in hollywood, but I do not believe there is sufficient evidence at ALL for Michael Jackson to be one of them.

Sure, he did some strange things like hang out with kids, but it's only strange to us. If you listened to his music or knew what he was about, it's really not all that surprising. Furthermore, if you knew his history and upbringing, mixed with even a highschool rudimentary understanding of psychology, it would make sense. But then again, the average IQ in America today is less than 100, so it's really not all too surprising that the masses cannot see through the baiters out there.

Here's a couple videos from a guy I love to listen to on the 'tube. He knows the cases in and out, and presents thusly; the evidence is none. The conjecture is mere heresay. The witnesses are just looking for money. The timetables are contradictory. End of story.

Because I forgot how to embed videos, the links are:
Part one
Part Two
Part Three

Yeah -- i don't think so -- who wants to nap with kids? That just leads to you know what....
MJ's songs: Smooth Criminal (or i just molested your kids secretly) & Bad (i'm a child molester) & Thriller (the thrill of molesting kids) & Black or White (or it doesn't matter if you're black or white ... i'll still molest you)