It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
However, Baker's sample of participants was only about 150 people which means a larger sample would be needed for conclusive results.
Yes there is. One example here: www.sciencedaily.com...
Your assertion alone shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.
As to the last one, thank you for clarifying. I've never heard of any transgender people being afraid to identify as transgender people or being called one. You'll have to give examples.
I've never heard of any transgender people being afraid to identify as transgender people or being called one. You'll have to give examples.
At first you said there's no evidence, now you typed a long winded explanation contradicting your own claim.
...representing a range or spectrum within the male experience...
And, perhaps most important, the areas measured are more likely an indication of how an individual's inherent nature will reconcile with environmental factors; in this case, society's gender stereotypes, expectations and biases.
such as the norms, expectations and stereotypes imposed by society.
That is called gender roles.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: projectvxn
Transitioning isn't "coddling" a mental illness. The prescribed and most effective treatment for it, according to ACTUAL psychologists and other scientists, is to transition.
originally posted by: AProudLefty
a reply to: scrounger
Name one person who claimed that they can change their biological sexes.
originally posted by: AProudLefty
a reply to: riiver
A clitoris is analogous to a penis.
Yes, the clitoris is analogous to a penis. However, it is NOT a penis. It's a clitoris--that is, a biologically female body part. Just as a penis--any penis, anywhere, any time--is a BIOLOGICALLY male body part
originally posted by: AProudLefty
a reply to: Boadicea
Perhaps you did not understand the point of my question. Why teach basic biology to us when we already know all about sexes? We are not talking about biological sexes. We're talking about genders. As to this topic, notice that the person still say "penis", so therefore she knows the biological aspect?
And you'll have to clarify your question.
She argued that if trans women are biological women, by definition, a trans woman’s penis is “a biologically female penis.”
Perhaps you didn't read the original OP carefully enough