It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by davenman
The lost NASA tapes sure seem to throw more fuel on this fire.
One has to ask why NASA doesn't know where tapes of such importance are.
Would such tapes prove that man never walked on the moon?
quote: One has to ask why NASA doesn't know where tapes of such importance are.
They're only human. Things like this happen unfortunately.
Originally posted by BadMojo
A recent conclusion I drew after hearing of the "missing" tapes is that the landings probably happened. My first thought was, "was the information imminent to be released by means of the freedom of information act?" If these ideas are linked, then maybe there is something within this "higher-definition" footage that the gov't doesn't want public. (other craft, other beings...you know where I'm headed) There are threads here about the "2 minutes of silence" during the broadcast and certain HAM radio operators picking up the "lost transmission".
www.abovetopsecret.com...
This would provide a solid out for any release of this information. If they're lost, who will see it?
Originally posted by jra
They're only human.
Originally posted by thesneakiod
Isnt there a mirror or something that they put on the surface?
I'm still trying to figure out the motive of these people claiming the moon landing was a hoax. I think these people are just arguing for arguings sake. Some people are like that, they will completely ignore all credible evidence and believe anything simply because it goes against the grain.
This report is the web version of a refereed paper in the scientific journal "Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia"
The paper was received on 1 February 2001, and accepted on 1 July 2001. Full reference should be made to it when citing any part of this report. To obtain a hard copy of the article (PASA Volume 18, Number 3) click here to get a PDF version or a PS version.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Did you know it is possible for amature radio opperators to bounce signals off the moon?
Called EME or moonbounce, it was first done in the '40s and '50s.
Why do you think that the 64 meter Praks dish was not capable of recieveing the signals?
Originally posted by pepsi78
it has nothing to do with transmison from the moon.
One thing is transmiting signals from earth and bouncing them off the moon, and another thing is reciving a broadcast from the moon.
A transmiter does not do the job of a reciver again.
The first Amateur Radio signals to echo from the moon were transmitted in 1953. Ross Bateman, W4AO, and William L. Smith, W3GKP, bounced 144-MHz signals off the moon.
EME today is an increasingly popular Amateur Radio operating mode among VHF and UHF enthusiasts. Radio amateurs regularly beam signals to the moon, with their reflections painting a large area of our planet.
The ham who engineered the first Amateur Radio EME contact in 1960 with hams on the East Coast -- Orrin "Hank" Brown, W6HB -- also died in January 1999, in California. Brown also was 92.
Communicating over great distances via VHF continues to fascinate many amateurs. EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) communication, also known as "moonbounce", meteor scatter, and VHF cw DX are some of the techniques used. In the case of EME and meteor scatter, the concept is simple: use the moon or the ionized trail of a meteor as a passive reflector for VHF and UHF signals. A simple but effective station is within the reach of most amateur experimenters. With the advent of very sensitive receiving preamplifiers and commercially available high-gain Yagi antennas, many VHF operators are enjoying successful weak signal contacts. With a total path length of about 500,000 miles, EME is the ultimate DX
Originally posted by pepsi78
Why do you think that the 64 meter Praks dish was not capable of recieveing the signals?
Simply because the signal sent from the moon would of been to weak.
In order to transmit from the moon you would need a uplink.
Originally posted by pepsi78
The recivers are not ment to go fetch the data out there, no they wait for the data to come to them, and depending how strong radio waves are they capture them.
A satelite dish with a reciver does just that, it captures the data that bounces of the dish, it does not some how capture the signal in space, the signal is captured on impact with the dish.
Originally posted by pepsi78
this would be your theory, and it's incorect.
To think the dish some how sends a signal in to space and then that signal is intercepted by another radio wave in space and then a connection is established is incorect
Originally posted by pepsi78
I would say if that would be the case we would not need geo stationary satelites which are ment to relay the signal.
Satelite recivers, and radio telescopes do not work that way, the only way they work is by the radiowaves coming to them
Originally posted by pepsi78
To bounce a singal on the moon would not result in a moon transmision, it would result in a earth transmison to the moon and not vice versa.
Do you even have the faintest idea just how stupid that is?
Anyway, for your continued education:
The first Amateur Radio signals to echo from the moon were transmitted in 1953. Ross Bateman, W4AO, and William L. Smith, W3GKP, bounced 144-MHz signals off the moon.
EME today is an increasingly popular Amateur Radio operating mode among VHF and UHF enthusiasts. Radio amateurs regularly beam signals to the moon, with their reflections painting a large area of our planet.
The ham who engineered the first Amateur Radio EME contact in 1960 with hams on the East Coast -- Orrin "Hank" Brown, W6HB -- also died in January 1999, in California. Brown also was 92.