It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Doc explain your latest babble to the masses of ATS . sock puppet number 4
Originally posted by WeaselSpencer
reply to post by UnMature
[m
They faked it so as to cover uP other things. They pretend to do one thing and turn around and do another .
originally posted by: wildespace
Someone resurrects a 10-year-old thread without actually checking what it's about, and ends up not manking much sense anyway.
Priceless.
originally posted by: coastlinekid
a reply to: wildespace
Do you actually expect someone to read 180 pages...
WTVR...
originally posted by: MickeyDee
I truly believe that we did land on the moon back in '69, and so should everybody else.
So to finally end all the speculation regaurding the landings, why on earth doesnt NASA use Hubble to photograph the landing sites?
We've seen the amazing things that Hubble can do, so im sure it could give us amazing pics of the lunar surface.
It would be to NASA's advantage as their was no point them spending billions going to the moon if nobody believes they did!!!
One more thing! Why did they never fake a Mars landing!!