It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by resistance
Mission to Mars.
Originally posted by resistance
Originally posted by Halfofone
Well if you've seen the entire video you will notice that the blue light in the windows is there all the time. You are probably thinking EXACTICALY!!! because the were in low earth orbit the entire time....
However, if you know anything about orbiting earth, you would know that you are orbiting at about 45 min on the day side and 45 min on the night side. Therefore sometimes you would see black and sometimes earth, but this is not the case.
Halfo -- The point is, that even if there was not 45 minutes of blue and 45 minutes of black (which how would you know that?) there just shouldn't be ANY bllue if they are in deep space and not orbiting at all. And to try to explain the blue sky away by saying it's just light reflecting, you can believe that but I don't.
Oh, and sorry to butt in on your discussionon the aliens and the astroNOTs. I don't know if any of them truly personally believe in aliens (unless they've been subjected to mind control programming by NASA and the secret military, like I think Buzz may have been) -- but I think they'd all like everybody else to believe in them. NASA obviously acts like they believe in aliens and would like the rest of us to believe in them. NOT.
Hmmm. I wonder why our government picked the congressional medal of honor to be the same symbol as that the witches use? (five pointed star in a circle). Oh, well. Probably just a coincidence, like the Illuminati's eye of horus and the pyramid is just a coincidence on the dollar bill.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Originally posted by resistance
Mission to Mars.
I wouldn't actually call a movie that made over $100 millions dollars worldwide ($60 million in the USA) a flop. Also, it wasn't a Disney film. Disney had nothing to do with it, as you can see here: Company credits for
Mission to Mars. If anything, Mission to Mars was a movie made to compete with Warner Brother's Red Planet. That's not a conspiracy either... It's just business.
Originally posted by resistance
Agent -- You are quite right that I have not read any of the posts on the astroNOTs and their "sightings" or any of the alien stuff. I am almost as bored by the aliens as I am by the Apollo missions and the Hubble telescope. (yawn). Why should I concern myself with the latest flimflam appearance by a stupid demon from the pits of hell? These creatures are liars, deceivers, and destroyers. I'm only interested in exposing them -- not watching their many thousands of antics and appearances. I know what they are and who they are and they can't hurt me. They only way they can hurt me is by deceiving people on this earth who then ARE able to hurt me. So my best defense against them is to try to warn others not to listen to them or to believe them in any way. This I try to do on this forum and others.
Since the Illuminati worship the head demon I think they are well aware of who they are dealing with. Since the military has been taken over by Nazi Homosexual Illuminati the military knows full well who they deal with, and they deal with them directly (demons). The military is heavily occult and the traffic with demons is ongoing. They are manifesting, and some say are even being bred to humans. The "alien deception" is done with a full cooperaton between the military and the demonic world. Between the two of them (the Nazi Homosexual Illuminati Military and their demon allies, they are going to foist an so-called alien invasion on us. They will produce some kind of creatures that will seem to be not human and very powerful in performing psychic feats and such, and will completely fool almost the entire populace of the world. But I won't be one of those who are fooled. About that time is when I grab my survival kit and head for the mountains.
And as to your posted pics, once you leave the earth's atmosphere the sky is black. The blue color comes from the refraction of light in the earth's atmosphere. No atmosphere, no light -- as I'm sure, smart guy that you are, you already know.
Outgassing
The release of solvents and moisture from composite parts under a vacuum.
www.acmanet.org...
As to the posted moon pics, probably something Calvin Hamilton cooked up on his Photoshop like 99 percent of all NASA's pictures are. NASA and Disney make a good team. They just need to get some better scriptwriters.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
I'm glad you posted that video, here's the actual transcript of the question asked and the response in the Apollo 11 Press Conference:
Reporter: When you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars and the solar corona in spite of the glare?
Armstrong: We were never able to see stars from the surface or on the daylight side of the moon, by eye, without looking through the optics.
I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the Solar Corona what stars we could see.
Collins: I don't remember seeing any
And where is the smoking gun exactly? Makes perfect sense to me and ties in with the known laws of physics.
Originally posted by AgentSmith
He will have been in light most if not all of the time. Even when on the 'Dark side' of the Moon and didn't have the glare from Earth to contend with he will have been in Sunlight - the dark side just never faces us.
The rare occasions he might have had the oppurtunity and been in darkess he was probably too busy doing his job or sleeping.
Edit:
While all this Illumanti stuff is truly fascinating - I fear you are detracting away from the topic of conversation which is about the Lunar missions.
Perhaps you would like to start a thread in the fine 'Secret Society' Forum?
There no point manipulating this into a discussion into the NWO when you are loosing scientific arguments about an event that revolved purely around science.
[edit on 5-11-2005 by AgentSmith]
Originally posted by resistance
Yeah. I know you think looking for stars or observing the heavens is equivalent to going on vacation. The only important thing is bringing back half a ton of rocks.
Why did he say he didn't "remember" seeing any stars? Why not say, It is impossible to see stars in space because of either moonshine or earthshine?
Huh? Why did he say he couldn't "REMEMBER" seeing any stars? Why did he act so confused and why were Armstrong and Collins exchanging glances like they wanted to be sure they got their stories straight? Why were all three of them squirming around like the body buried under the porch was starting to smell and they hoped nobody noticed?
Originally posted by resistance
You guys would believe anything if somebody with a white coat on told you, or if you read it in a textbook, or a college professor told you. Doesn't matter what they said, you'd believe it. Did you ever think about using your own brain that God gave you?
Originally posted by resistance
Since the Illuminati worship the head demon (known by many names but Lucifer, Satan, Bel, Baal, Osiris, Ra, Baphomet) they are well aware of who they are dealing with. Since the military has been taken over at many levels (i.e. see Griggs interview link where she tells that you just don't get promoted unless you play the Nazi homo game) by Nazi Homosexual Illuminati the military knows full well who they deal with, and they deal with them directly (demons). The military is heavily occult and the traffic with demons is ongoing. The demons are manifesting (through torturing another human you can make them manifest), and some say these slimy evil creatures are even being bred to humans (I don't doubt it). The "alien deception" is done with a full cooperaton between the occult-ridden military and the demonic world. Between the two of them (the Nazi Homosexual Illuminati Military, NASA and their demon allies), they are going to foist a so-called alien invasion on us. They will produce some kind of creatures that will seem to be not human and very powerful in performing psychic feats and such, and will completely fool almost the entire populace of the world. But I won't be one of those who are fooled. About that time is when I grab my survival kit and head for the mountains.
Originally posted by resistance
Okay, Agent, jra, et al:
You guys would believe anything if somebody with a white coat on told you, or if you read it in a textbook, or a college professor told you. Doesn't matter what they said, you'd believe it.
Did you ever think about using your own brain that God gave you?
Originally posted by jra
I believe whatever has the most overwhelming evidence for and also what makes the most sense logicly. You seem to have a biased opinion about everything relating to space and science to begin with. I'm not even going to touch that halfbacked Illuminati stuff you went off about...
I research every thing I can before I open my mouth. I learn all I can from various sources and form an opinion of my own. Unlike some people I know who seem to only regurgitate the things that they are told/read by other people, with little facts to back it up.
Originally posted by resistance
Originally posted by jra
I believe whatever has the most overwhelming evidence for and also what makes the most sense logicly. You seem to have a biased opinion about everything relating to space and science to begin with. I'm not even going to touch that halfbacked Illuminati stuff you went off about...
What you're really saying here is that you will believe whatever you're told, if it's told you often enough and by people you "trust" and respect. When you say you aren't even going to "touch the halfbaked Illuminati stuff" -- it shows you are impervious to truth if it contradicts what you've always heard and what Dan Rather told you on TV, etcetera.
As to science, I love science. Pseudoscience is what I don't like.
Quite obviously Apollo and all that is romantic smoke and mirrors nonsense. People do have to go to the bathroom, for example. And if you go someplace like the moon you get off and you start looking up and around and everywhere. You don't get a shovel and start digging rocks. And who the heck cares about a silly flag stuck in the moon? Like, man, what do you guys SEE up there?
Agent thinks they could not look up, shouldn't BE looking up (because they're not on VACATION! no less.
You guys don't have a clue what real science is IMO.
I research every thing I can before I open my mouth. I learn all I can from various sources and form an opinion of my own. Unlike some people I know who seem to only regurgitate the things that they are told/read by other people, with little facts to back it up.
The only "facts" you're looking up are anything and everything that might possibly offer some kind of excuse, any excuse, for NASA and the fact that they mooned America.
Agent -- BTW, what a nice new avatar you have, the sign of the Illuminati. You are so cool, man.
www.google.co.uk...
- a manifestation of God's foresightful care for his creatures
- God s will, as expressed through events on Earth. Fate is seen as revelation.
- God working all things to the purpose of his will (Isa.40:28; Ps.139:13; Rom.8:28)
- Care or guardianship.
- God's goodness and benevolent care of all people.
- God; the Deity
Might I interject a bit of Scripture here without the risk of being banned or sent to the Christian Ghetto (aka Below Top Secret)?
Woe unto those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20
[edit on 5-11-2005 by resistance]
Matthew 7:15 - Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Matthew 24:11 - And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
Matthew 24:24 - For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
Mark 13:22 - For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.
Luke 6:26 - Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets.
2 Peter 2:1 - But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
1 John 4:1 - Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Revelation 16:13 - And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
Revelation 19:20 - And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
Originally posted by resistance
Agent -- Science is not the American flag. It is not half a ton of moon rocks.
If I went to the moon that would be the last thing on my mind. The last.
I would have a lot to see and tell.
I would not be playing golf and I would not be smuggling golf balls there to play golf.
I would have no need or desire for a moon buggy.
None of the things that were said and done in the AstroNOTs script sound like anything anybody would really say.
And the thing about the catheter and poop bag is an attempt to insert some realism into the Wonderful World of Disney here. Ahem.
The site I sent you to brought up some good points. What happens if you throw up on the moon?
What happens if you fall down and rip your space suit?
How do you go to the bathroom when you're wearing a spacesuit for 10 days or more?
And it gets really, really hot in a pressurized suit when you're surrounded by a vacuum and the sun is beating down. Your body heat has no place to go. The astroNOTs had no lifeline to anything, just those hokey coolpacks on their back.
So the eye of Horus is not the sign of the Illuminati? Really? It's the sign of Christianity? How could I have missed that?
I never meant to imply that I know nothing at all about science and/or physics. Biology was a piece of cake for me. I've always been interested in science, and even though I am a grown adult I read about it, just for my own enlightenment and because I have a hungry mind that wants to know the truth -- no matter WHAT the truth is.
I am a grown adult
No matter where it takes me, that's where I want to go. So I am not a flat-
earth hermit muttering from my cave.
Originally posted by resistance
Agent -- You put up links about the spacesuits. What those links showed me was that the shuttle spacemen had lifelines to the ship, that their suits were heavier than the astroNOTs. The shuttle spacepersons were outside the ship for a short period, but they needed more equipment to sustain them than the astroNOTs did. That was my point. The astroNOTs had NO LIFELINE.
The Apollo space suits were the first to use liquid cooling garments with a separate ventilation garment. The cooling and ventilation system was drastically improved because the astronauts would be doing a great amount of physical activity exploring the moon therefore producing more body heat and perspiration. The astronaut would first dawn the liquid cooling garment, which was long underwear with poly-vinyl tubing sewn in it. This water was cooled in the PLSS and returned to the tubes to cool the astronaut. The ventilation garment was the inner most layer of the pressure garment. This ventilation garment used nylon fabric ducts to circulate the air inside the suit in order to remove carbon dioxide as well as perspiration. This system is very close to the current system in its design because they both use the PLSS to provide cool water and ventilation and their actual construction is very similar. These same Apollo suits were again used in the Apollo-Soyuz missions but relied on an umbilical tether to the spacecraft for air and water. The case was the same for the Skylab missions as well. ILC Dover manufactured and designed both of the suits. ILC Dover manufactures LCVG's for the current space shuttle suit.
ssoar.org...
The Shuttle EMU suit weighed 50 kg and its PLSS Portable Life Support System, 15 kg. It provided life support for up to nine hours.
www.astronautix.com...
Primary Life-Support Subsystem (PLSS)
The PLSS is the backpack worn by the astronaut. It contains the oxygen tanks (1.2 lb / 0.54 kg at 518 atm tank pressure), carbon dioxide scrubbers/filters, cooling water (10 lb / 4.6 kg total), radio, electrical power, ventilating fans and warning systems. Oxygen flows into the suit behind the astronauts's head and out of the suit at the feet and elbows. Once inside the PLSS, the air flow enters a charcoal cartridge, to remove odors, and then the carbon dioxide scrubber cartridge. The gas flow then goes through a fan, and then to a sublimator that removes water vapor and returns it to the cooling-water supply. The temperature of the air flow is maintained at 55 F (12.8 C). The astronaut can adjust the temperature, pressure and air flow through controls on the DCM. The PLSS provides up to seven hours of oxygen supply and carbon dioxide removal.
science.howstuffworks.com...
And the Apollo 17 PLSS:
For Apollo 17, each PLSS could hold enough oxygen (1.8 pounds), feedwater water (12 pounds), and battery power (25 amp hours) to see an astronaut through seven to eight hours of Extravehicular Activity (EVA).
www.hq.nasa.gov...
As experience and confidence grew after the first few missions, it became apparent that longer duration EVAs could be accommodated. EVAs for Apollo 11 through 14 were limited to 4 hours. To support the more ambitious exploration plans for Apollo 15 through 17, the PLSS operational lifetime was doubled to 8 hours. The changes made to the PLSS were:
Oxygen capacity: Pressure in the primary oxygen bottles was increased to 1430 PSIA from 1020 PSIA
Feedwater for cooling: Increased to 11.5 pounds (about 5.2 liters) from 8.5 pounds (about 3.9 liters)
Battery: Capacity increased to 390 watt-hours from 279 watt-hours
Lithium hydroxide: canister increased to hold 3.12 pounds of LiOH, up from 3.0 pounds.
The capacity of the OPS was not changed, and remained at about 30 minutes of oxygen for breathing and cooling. When combined with the Buddy Secondary Life Support System, which used the functional PLSS for cooling, the OPS could supply oxygen for 75 to 90 minutes.
They also had the OPS and BSLSS (see above) which provided portable backup in the case of emergency.
Also, the shuttle spacepersons were in low earth orbit, not subject to radiation. The radiation on the moon is horrendous. NASA admits that and is sending a probe in 10 years to study the radiation.
But the astroNOTs could bop around on the moon with catheters and poop bags and no lifeline and hokey cool packs and ride around on moon buggies and take a million pictures and put foil around their hokey moon lander and all that stuff?
Tell me the truth. After looking at the picture of that moon lander, do you honestly and truly deep in your heart believe that thing landed on the moon and then took off to meet the mother ship? Not once but six times?
Tell me the truth.
And as to your claim that the Illuminati sign you have as your new avatar is somehow "Christian," (which according to what I know is not any sign of God at all the way you have it up there) -- Scripture says to avoid even the appearance of evil. It sure looks evil to me and it looks evil to me on the dollar bill also.
The All-Seeing Eye
This all-seeing eye of God looks out from the triangle of the Trinity. It is found in some English and Greek churches.
home.rochester.rr.com...
"The single eye was a well-established artistic convention for an 'omniscient Ubiquitous Deity' in the medallic art of the Renaissance. In 1614 the frontispiece of The History of the World by Sir Walter Raleigh showed an eye in a cloud labeled "Providentia" overlooking a globe. Du Simitiere, who suggested using the symbol, collected art books and was familiar with the artistic and ornamental devices used in Renaissance art."3
The all-seeing eye of God is noted several times in the Christian Bible:
Psalm 32:8 I will instruct thee and teach thee in the way which thou shalt go: I will guide thee with mine eye.
Psalm 33:18 Behold, the eye of the LORD is upon them that fear him, upon them that hope in his mercy;
Ezekiel 20:17 Nevertheless mine eye spared them from destroying them, neither did I make an end of them in the wilderness.
...................
The eye inside of an equilateral triangle, point up or down, has often appeared in Christian art. "It is often placed high above the alter as in the Pfarrkirche at Grmunden am Traunsee (1626) and the Fisherman's church at Traunkirchen, while it appears over the doorway of the church of the monastary of St. Florian near Linz."
freemasonry.bcy.ca...
The later addition of an enclosing triangle is usually seen as a more explicit trinitarian reference to the God of Christianity.
www.answers.com...
How come you know so much about Magick (as you say) but nothing about the Illuminati? Hmmm.