Strange Area In Photograph

a reply to: ArMaP

You must know.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

Get it through your skull. You are using cgi images.

One anomaly that needs looking at are the blocks at Crookes? Back to to what appears to be a glass dome at Mare Smithii this time from Apollo 16



Any ideas?

a reply to: [post=24170679]lunarrover[

Be told man, I aint avin any of it

That seems to be the problem here. What you "aint avin" is being educated about these images by posters with demonstrably more in depth knowledge about the subject than you.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Is that a fact?

What part of "Rubbish in = Rubbish out" do you not understand ?

a reply to: lunarrover

lunar wave is mo fun

a reply to: lunarrover

Yes, it is a fact.

I understand that fine, thank you, it's just that you have presented absolutely no evidence to support that what other posters have said and posted is "rubbish" as you claim (which is rather rude of you) other than because you say it is all "lies", "fake", "CGI" and so on.

That's not good enough, I'm afraid.

You need to actually answer questions that have been put to you, if you can, rather than just wave your hands at them.

Please take this as constructive criticism as at the moment you seem to be going nowhere with your claims.

a reply to: Lysergic

Refresh rate issue with the digital equipment.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Ok

Agree going nowhere. Round and round. Not very much has been answered, using known questionable data does not make it fact. people are in denial about the glass dome structures. For my next trick I want the telemetry data from Apollo 11 of Crooks? All was destroyed why? So the only available could be computer generated false data? And I would like for us to spend some time looking at the central peak? In detail. Mapping to a fake telemetry map is not washing either.

Stalemate

a reply to: lunarrover

Well, moving the goalposts like that is not going to help.

As far as I can see all your claims have been answered and in great detail and it is you that is not answering any of this.

I will leave it to others on here who are more knowledgeable about such things than me, or you, for that matter.

a reply to: lunarrover

Here we are:

Wiki: Apollo 11 Missing Tapes

Your questions answered.

Wrong again

Next, please?

a reply to: lunarrover

So the only available could be computer generated false data?

No. See my Wiki link.

For your next trick?

a reply to: lunarrover

Stalemate

Not really, no. Your move.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Well lets get the data for crookes and check with the image in question. But the Moon is a fluid environment one minute its blocks the next its huge titanium superstructure and artificially constructed gargantuan space stations.

If OBMT can do it with that image, which I doubt he can. If for example He wants to create a virtual model and texture map as he has so expertly done thus far but this time provide telemetry data which can be confirmed? I do not think Kaguya or commie material can be trusted?

a reply to: lunarrover

Well lets get the data for crookes and check with the image in question.

Go on then - do it.

But the Moon is a fluid environment one minute its blocks the next its huge titanium superstructure and artificially constructed gargantuan space stations.

You sure about that? "Titanium" - you can tell that from your images? How?

I do not think Kaguya or commie material can be trusted?

Why not?

a reply to: lunarrover

Am I getting this right? Are you saying that only your images are real and everything else is fake?

a reply to: oldcarpy

No because they are not my images they are owned by NASA and there are inconsistencies.

Look at Crooks from Apollo 8 then Apollo 11?

a reply to: lunarrover

Where did you get your images from?

Kaguya and "commie" ones are not "owned by NASA".

Look at Crooks from Apollo 8 then Apollo 11?

Show me and I will.

a reply to: oldcarpy

history.nasa.gov...

spaceflight.nasa.gov...

a reply to: lunarrover

Nice pictures. What's your point?