Strange Area In Photograph

a reply to: lunarrover

This is not a windup.

Yes, it is. Quite obviously now.

a reply to: oldcarpy

Is it?

Not so mate.

a reply to: oldcarpy

It isn't. Its real man.

You gotta work it, you gotta twerk it. Then you've gotta flip it and reverse it.

a reply to: lunarrover

Your hair is not my problem.

I know that most people have some problems understanding perspective and projections, having had descriptive geometry classes helps understanding this kind of thing.

If I have the time I will make a small experiment to show you that what I say is possible.

a reply to: ArMaP

No, please don't bother. I get it mate I really do. Let us just leave it here. We both know that continuing the charade is completely pointless.

originally posted by: lunarrover
a reply to: oldcarpy

Reptilians, Tall Whites, Nordics, and Greys. No Bats tho

Do any of them have tentacles. Please let some of them have tentacles; I so love tentacles.

a reply to: Blaine91555

Maybe on a water world they do buddy.

The universe is 13.772bln years old and unimaginably large. Is it not arrogant to suggest that we are where it is at?

originally posted by: lunarrover
No, please don't bother. I get it mate I really do.

Sorry, but thanks to your attitude in your answers I don't believe you.

Let us just leave it here.

Why, don't you want me to prove you wrong?

We both know that continuing the charade is completely pointless.

You think it's pointless, I hope it's not, so I'll do it if I have the time.

As I said before, my posts are not only for the people that post, they are also for the people that only read (and those that are not even members of ATS) but are interested in the topic.

a reply to: lunarrover

That it is and I have little doubt life exists all over the universe.

There is no evidence however, that anyone has produced to date, that they are on the Moon.

You know, I'd be thrilled if it turned out to be true, but it's not.

a reply to: Blaine91555

You are entitled to your opinion but I do not agree.

a reply to: ArMaP

You can't prove me wrong. It is a war of attrition and a complete waste of everybody's time and energy. Tbe honest I don't want to hear it.

I am researching the amplified jpeg artefacts that infect the images OBMT posted. I have never seen it to that scale before they are like living pixels it is an amazing phenomena that I have not seen to that extent before.
When you resize them they morph.

a reply to: lunarrover

You've been proved wrong time and time again, you're just too blinkered to realise it. [SNIPPED]

Your problem is that the raw images I downloaded weren't jpgs. Download the originals and do your own work instead of trying to make mine forced to fit your agenda.

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

No I have not.

This is my last post on this thread.

Bye.

originally posted by: lunarrover
You can't prove me wrong.

I can prove you are wrong when you deny the existence of known facts.

It is a war of attrition and a complete waste of everybody's time and energy. Tbe honest I don't want to hear it.

That doesn't surprise, as you sound more and more like someone that doesn't care about the truth, only about their opinions.

It's a shame, at first I thought I was looking at an "old style" ATS thread, with interesting images supported by research. After all I was only looking a collection of baseless opinions.

I am researching the amplified jpeg artefacts that infect the images OBMT posted. I have never seen it to that scale before they are like living pixels it is an amazing phenomena that I have not seen to that extent before.
When you resize them they morph.

That shows how much you know about digital images.

a reply to: lunarrover

a reply to: OneBigMonkeyToo

I am not talking about your images, it was one I posted that you had messed with.

a reply to: lunarrover

[snipped]

I have not 'messed with' any images of yours other than to rectify it to position one of them correctly on the lunar surface. I have changed nothing in the content, just its dimensions on the ground.

I have supplied you with all the information you need to be able to do that for yourself. If you use the same methodology and tools that I have I guarantee you will get the same result. I am pretty confident you won't bother.

If that is the image to which you are referring you will I am sure agree that the features on it are a match for the high resolution, high quality images that show what is on the lunar surface - namely hills and craters within a much larger crater.