It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Pandaram
These are bunch of junkies.. they will die soon. Like how American killed off by invaders germs? So building a wall someone country is stupid.. use the cash to buy more stash.
They're also someone's children!
Get help.
they're also junkies.
if a person got addicted before becoming an adult, i would blame the parents.
if after that, it's his own fault and you know that.
don't get me wrong, i'm all for building that damn wall, but do you really think it'll solve this particular problem?
it will NOT. where's demand, there's supply, and addicted person will do everything to get the next dose. if you think doing anything else than fighting with your stepson's addiction can solve his problem, you're terribly wrong. you could as well just nuke Mexico, it wouldn't change a damn thing. either he'll stop taking drugs, or he's as good as dead.
you may think i'm harsh, but you're in need of a serious reality check.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: MrBuddy
Addiction is the result of childhood trauma.
Look up Dr Gabor Mate and addiction on youtube.... it may educate you on all addictions.
originally posted by: Magnivea
a reply to: stonerwilliam
Appreciated. What you say is also true in most cases. The only reason my cousin was able to stay sober was uprooting and leaving the area, totally starting over. Sadly there's no real happy ending there though as she was diagnosed with a large malignant tumor almost directly in the center of her brain in October 2017. She only made it to the second week of January 2018, 2 weeks shy of her 34th birthday, but at least got to experience life as a normal person without that weight for a few years first. At least she passed with a sense of pride instead of high in a Dunkin donuts bathroom.
That's why I have the feelings I do on the topic. The memories of drug free happiness are still there. The "wasted potential" thoughts are ever present in the back of your mind no matter how hard you try to forget. Will power, humility and the resolve to say "this is it" is ultimately all that's needed.
originally posted by: olaru12
Don't you think it's time for the junkies to take personal responsibility for their own lives?
Always looking for a scapegoat to place the blame on rather than their own scumbag oh poor me, lifestyle.
McCarthy had also become addicted to heroin. Harry J. Anslinger, head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, became aware of McCarthy's addiction in the 1950s, and demanded he stop using the drug.
McCarthy refused. In Anslinger's memoir, The Murderers, McCarthy is anonymously quoted as saying: I wouldn't try to do anything about it, Commissioner ... It will be the worse for you ... and if it winds up in a public scandal and that should hurt this country, I wouldn't care [. . .] The choice is yours.
Anslinger decided to give McCarthy access to heroin in secret from a pharmacy in Washington, DC.
The heroin was paid for by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, right up to McCarthy's death. Anslinger never publicly named McCarthy, and he threatened a journalist who uncovered the story with prison.[144]
However, McCarthy's identity was known to Anslinger's agents, and journalist Maxine Cheshire confirmed his identity with Will Oursler, co-author of The Murderers, in 1978
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: JohnnyJetson
I think you will find that member replied in such a fashion because of the numerous debates on this site about, poor people homelessness, food stamps government handouts etc.
The general go to for conservatives especially is to shame people that haven't taken what they consider personal responsibility in their lives, which includes people that work 2 or 3 jobs and cannot make ends meet, the shaming is in pointing out these people should have educated themselves better and found better paying work . That's one of many examples , so yes it comes off as a harsh comment but is in fact a rebuttal to the view that people that don't have personal responsibility should suffer as they deserve it.
I lie, I smoked opium in Laos quite a lot, but I've never mainlined.
Since the 70'S there have been studies that have shown it to be harmful to DNA, and to degrade short term memory.
2. Cannabinoids and Cancer 2.1
Cannabinoid and Endocannabinoid Mediated Effects Many laboratories have proposed that cannabinoids and endocannabinoids directly inhibit tumor growth in vitro and in animal tumor models through several different pathways.
The inhibition of tumor growth and progression of several types of cancers including glioma, glioblastoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, colon carcinoma, leukemia, and lymphoid tumors have been demonstrated by natural and synthetic cannabinoids, endocannabinoids, endocannabinoid analogs, endocannabinoid transport inhibitors, and endocannabinoid degradation inhibitors.
How about the heroin that came (and possibly still comes) from Afghanistan? During our involvement the heroin production boomed.
The wall is a simple bandaid that won't stop the bleeding.
I used to think exactly that same way too...Really.
Having a heroin addict come into in the family and being present for his struggles has shown me that this type of addiction is different than many (or all) others.
Heroin addiction is [almost] always a death sentence.
originally posted by: Realtruth
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Pandaram
These are bunch of junkies.. they will die soon. Like how American killed off by invaders germs? So building a wall someone country is stupid.. use the cash to buy more stash.
They're also someone's children!
Get help.
they're also junkies.
if a person got addicted before becoming an adult, i would blame the parents.
if after that, it's his own fault and you know that.
don't get me wrong, i'm all for building that damn wall, but do you really think it'll solve this particular problem?
it will NOT. where's demand, there's supply, and addicted person will do everything to get the next dose. if you think doing anything else than fighting with your stepson's addiction can solve his problem, you're terribly wrong. you could as well just nuke Mexico, it wouldn't change a damn thing. either he'll stop taking drugs, or he's as good as dead.
you may think i'm harsh, but you're in need of a serious reality check.
Since this is the "Rant" forum, the OP is venting, in a state of chaos, and hardships I wouldn't wish on anyone. Only people that have been through this ring-of-fire understand how taxing it is, on all levels for everyone involved.
When people are in an emotional situation, and have little outlets to vent, or people to talk with they come here to unload, but when someone starts to reprimand, or diminish the person it shows a lack of empathy.
People understand the implications of drug addictions, they don't need to be reminded by mean-spirited people on ATS.
You may think I'm harsh, but you're also in need of a humanity check.
originally posted by: Drucifer
It seems hypocritical for right wingers to call for a wall to stop drugs while at the same time saying gun legislation is anti-2nd amendment and that guns do not kill people, people kill people. Heroin, on its own, does not kill people. People have to use it in order for it to be lethal....