TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

February 13, 2019

Roger Stone's Attorney filed a motion in court today, alleging that the Special Council's office tipped-off CNN to the sealed-indictment, before it was un-sealed. That's why CNN arrived at Roger Stone's home 1 hour before he was raided by the FBI.

Source: saraacarter.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
February 13, 2019

Roger Stone's Attorney filed a motion in court today, alleging that the Special Council's office tipped-off CNN to the sealed-indictment, before it was un-sealed. That's why CNN arrived at Roger Stone's home 1 hour before he was raided by the FBI.

Source: saraacarter.com...

The Special Council's office has been illegally leaking information since the jump

Still no proof of collusion

Telling

a reply to: SamWontSleep
True. I'm glad the S.C. is being called-out for it in court this time.

originally posted by: carewemust
February 13, 2019

Roger Stone's Attorney filed a motion in court today, alleging that the Special Council's office tipped-off CNN to the sealed-indictment, before it was un-sealed. That's why CNN arrived at Roger Stone's home 1 hour before he was raided by the FBI.

Source: saraacarter.com...

Maybe it was Jerome Corsi that tipped them off. He overheard some stuff and was pissed at stone for the heart attackmurder attempt.

Still no proof of collusion

Kinda funny how that works in an investigation that is not over. They do not let everyone know the findings till the report comes out and then possible not even then..

Even funnier how people not involved in the investigation like to come out every now and then and claim still no proof just so the base can remain hopeful there is nothing the investigation has turned up. That is in between all the people going to jail that were involved with trump but go ahead and spend much time convincing yourselves it is all unrelated even though we just do not know what mueller is on about this long. Of coarse feel free to speculate he is really hunting down the clintons in some grand electric 4d chess game.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No, the issue here is that CNN had a copy of Stones indictment that did not have the usual PACER metadata attached to it. Meaning, they had access to a copy of the indictment before it had even been officially entered into the system, and/or before it was unsealed. That would prove 100% that the Mueller team tipped off CNN to be there to film the Stone arrest. Of course, we all knew that from the very beginning...just look who the guy is who "used his intuition" to know to show up at that date and time. He is a former FBI agent, who just happened to be Comey's protege, who was then fired by Trump.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No - the Bipartisan Senate committee who have interviewed over 200 witnesses came to the conclusion that they have no evidence of collusion with the Russians. Mueller is soon to hand in his report that says the same thing.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Mueller is soon to hand in his report that says the same thing.

Sounds redundant.

Why would mueller give them details of his investigation? He does not do that nor does the senate conduct the special councils investigation lest there be no need for mueller.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No, the issue here is that CNN had a copy of Stones indictment that did not have the usual PACER metadata attached to it. Meaning, they had access to a copy of the indictment before it had even been officially entered into the system, and/or before it was unsealed. That would prove 100% that the Mueller team tipped off CNN to be there to film the Stone arrest. Of course, we all knew that from the very beginning...just look who the guy is who "used his intuition" to know to show up at that date and time. He is a former FBI agent, who just happened to be Comey's protege, who was then fired by Trump.

I doubt that is true but if so what is the crime? Are we just trying to prove that cnn is gov.?

Interesting look at Flynn's new banner - Family Crest...





Also a look at the connection on the JAG - Judge Advocate General DJT tweet.

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

What? Hes going to give them a report on everything he found in his investigation when he is finished....which should be shortly. What are you talking about?

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No, the issue here is that CNN had a copy of Stones indictment that did not have the usual PACER metadata attached to it. Meaning, they had access to a copy of the indictment before it had even been officially entered into the system, and/or before it was unsealed. That would prove 100% that the Mueller team tipped off CNN to be there to film the Stone arrest. Of course, we all knew that from the very beginning...just look who the guy is who "used his intuition" to know to show up at that date and time. He is a former FBI agent, who just happened to be Comey's protege, who was then fired by Trump.

I doubt that is true but if so what is the crime? Are we just trying to prove that cnn is gov.?

Here you go, just in case you really dont understand and are not just playing dumb...

www.americanthinker.com...

originally posted by: PokeyJoe

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

No, the issue here is that CNN had a copy of Stones indictment that did not have the usual PACER metadata attached to it. Meaning, they had access to a copy of the indictment before it had even been officially entered into the system, and/or before it was unsealed. That would prove 100% that the Mueller team tipped off CNN to be there to film the Stone arrest. Of course, we all knew that from the very beginning...just look who the guy is who "used his intuition" to know to show up at that date and time. He is a former FBI agent, who just happened to be Comey's protege, who was then fired by Trump.

I doubt that is true but if so what is the crime? Are we just trying to prove that cnn is gov.?

Here you go, just in case you really dont understand and are not just playing dumb...

www.americanthinker.com...

Yea that is alot of speculation as to "could be enough to ruin the 2 year investigation". The chances of that are null. Nice blog though. It is rodgers greatest hope.lol There may be some truth in it but there are always two sides to the story and some might argue that having the media there saved stones life.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

What? Hes going to give them a report on everything he found in his investigation when he is finished....which should be shortly. What are you talking about?

Iam talking about the hope put forth in this thread that muellers investigation is the same as the senates. It is not.............

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

How do you figure? They are both investigating the exact same thing.

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: UncleTomahawk

How do you figure? They are both investigating the exact same thing.

lolerz

That"s fresh

5th for me

a reply to: crankyoldman

Fake.
Till I seen this >> www.flynnclan.com...

Army of Digital Soldiers rise up!

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

OK, so please...enlighten me with the major differences. They're both investigating Donald Trump colluding with Russia to help him win the 2016 election, correct? Is there something else that I'm missing here?

Air Force intelligence official who defected to Iran indicted

Who knew that Iran had such a robust counterintelligence apparatus?

Anons knew

a reply to: UncleTomahawk

What are you drinking today??