It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Freeborn
If my 8 year old Grandson was as discourteous as some of those MP's I'd slap him round the lug.
Like so many I know, including a surprising number of ex-Remainers, I just want it over and done with and come out now with a No Deal and then sit down and talk after March 29th.
But I suspect we're going to get an extension and then either a watered down Brexit that gives us the worst of both worlds or an undemocratic second referendum.
No-one has come out of this farce with any credibility at all.
We must be the laughing stock of the world.....I know if this was going on in any other major country I'd be ripping the piss out of them.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Exactly right. The big honchos in the EU have been sounding the warning of the danger of an accidental crash out for some time, for all these reasons.
originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: andy06shake
The thing is, we know there is little support for No Deal in Westminster - there's relatively little support for Brexit if the truth is told - but they may just be surprised at the strength and amount of support for No Deal there is in the general public.
The public have been under-estimated before and they may indeed be again.
Yet more evidence, if more was needed, of just how out of touch and unfit for purpose our politicians are.
But voting for an extension does not solve the problems the government faces.
The EU will want to know if the UK wants to revoke article 50 or if it wants a referendum.
Those are choices the House must now face
originally posted by: ipsedixit
a reply to: UKTruth
Personally, I think she has been vectoring toward a "no deal" Brexit. Her conduct throughout has been almost incomprehensible. i can only think she is responding to the City of London, who I think are really behind Brexit and want to use it to get out from under European oversight. I think that during this process she has transitioned from being a more or less legitimate politician into being a straight tool of the financial elite.
I think Brexit is fake populism. If left unchallenged, she would have had a deal with no regulatory guarantees to workers. I think the "City" did the math and decided that regulatory compatibility with the EU was affordable and wouldn't cut into the opportunities envisioned by the bankers operating outside European supervision.
Chris Hanretty, a politics lecturer at the University of East Anglia, used statistic analysis to work out how the results for local authorities transfer onto constituencies. He revealed 401 out of 632 MPs represent constituencies which voted for Brexit in the referendum. The number equates to 63 per cent of constituencies, adding to the growing pressure on politicians not to defy the will of the electorate when Article 50 is put to a vote in the House of Commons.
originally posted by: UKTruth
You think the People's Vote was fake?
originally posted by: ipsedixit
originally posted by: UKTruth
You think the People's Vote was fake?
No, I think the whole campaign was manipulative and dishonest. I think there were a few dupers and a lot of duped voters. I'm not talking about the voting itself.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UKTruth
Long before then, some half-wit will start a war with the likes of Iran or manufacture some other mad bastard crisis and all this window dressing for the masses, and that's all it really is, will be long forgotten.