It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lumenari
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Carcharadon
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: chr0naut
Then it's fairly safe to say, you didn't learn the lessons correctly.
The Communists never do. Ever.
It'll work THIS time we promise!!!!!
You are aware that a lot of countries have dispensed with electoral colleges or similar without undue problems:
- Finland, replaced theirs in 1994.
- Spain, replaced theirs in 1939.
- France, replaced theirs in 1962.
- Britain, had a sort of electoral college that elected Labour Party leaders, replaced in 2010.
- Brazil, replaced theirs in 1989.
- Argentina, replaced theirs in 1995.
- Chile, replaced theirs in 1925.
and so on...
Nothing to do with Communists.
or with some vague and inexact allusion to "lessons of history".
The idea of democracy has been around since Ancient Greece and countries who undertook to decide 'who governed' by it are enormously less tyrannical than countries where power is allocated using other systems.
That is the lesson of history.
You are from New Zealand, correct?
The island that the UK owns and your monarch is Queen Elizabeth?
Wasn't it not till the 1990's that you were given permission to have three branches of government?
I think they are called the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches?
Since y'all seem to be cribbing from America's notes, here is a suggestion.
Become a sovereign nation. Write your own laws for a change, wait a few hundred years to see if your laws actually work...
Then you may have earned the right to criticize our nation.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
Why are you not concerned with this?
Because I just said it has zero chance of becoming an amendment.
I try to worry about reality, not fantasy.
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
So, can I go ahead and jot you down under the future worrier column?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
No, I have more important things to worry about than these proposals becoming amendments like wondering if I'm using the right laundry detergent or practicing cursive writing.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
So why are you posting in this thread if you are not worried at all?
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
No, I have more important things to worry about than these proposals becoming amendments like wondering if I'm using the right laundry detergent or practicing cursive writing.
So why are you posting in this thread if you are not worried at all? Why keep posting, time after time, if "you have more important things to worry about"? Why not just leave it alone, and instead post in a thread that interests you?
originally posted by: Nyiah
A thought occurred to me that made me chuckle pretty good, in that the EC is akin to being the voter welfare version of what Republicans hate -- taking something from the many (voting power) and redistributing it to the fewer (giving the lesser more voting power over the majority) If votes were money, the EC is effectively handing out the welfare vote checks to the ghetto denizens in that sense, now isn't it?
originally posted by: Lumenari
You are from New Zealand, correct?
The island that the UK owns and your monarch is Queen Elizabeth?
Wasn't it not till the 1990's that you were given permission to have three branches of government?
I think they are called the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches?
Since y'all seem to be cribbing from America's notes, here is a suggestion.
Become a sovereign nation. Write your own laws for a change, wait a few hundred years to see if your laws actually work...
Then you may have earned the right to criticize our nation.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Why are you even concerned with this? Neither has any chance of becoming a new amendment to the Constitution.
Why are you not concerned with this? Knowing how democrats were able to get away with granting pardons to democrat allies, and those who worked with them to try to go after the POTUS on "political grounds," and knowing that this sentiment to "abolish the EC has been publicly shared by many democrats including Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, etc, it should be a concern for all Americans, including democrats.
Thing is they have the majority of the population, they only need to swing the supreme, and just as always legislate from the bench with their players. It is only a matter of time they need not amend the constitution to rewrite or amend it from the benches.
originally posted by: valve
I get it’s not going to happen. One reason would be inevitable Civil War. Or a Revolution, that taxation without representation thing if only a few states are in play.
originally posted by: BigfootNZ
originally posted by: Lumenari
You are from New Zealand, correct?
The island that the UK owns and your monarch is Queen Elizabeth?
Wasn't it not till the 1990's that you were given permission to have three branches of government?
I think they are called the Judicial, Executive and Legislative branches?
Since y'all seem to be cribbing from America's notes, here is a suggestion.
Become a sovereign nation. Write your own laws for a change, wait a few hundred years to see if your laws actually work...
Then you may have earned the right to criticize our nation.
Holy crap on a cracker what ignorance...
We write our own laws, we didnt crib anything from America (as if those things you mentioned were American inventions to begin with i mean governance did exist prior to America being founded you know) the Queen doesnt own us, the UK doesnt own us. We are and have been for a long time an independent country who is also part of a commonwealth of other independent countries (who all got given the choice to stay or be independent) who all share a common figure head who has no actual power outside of being a common thread between us, ie the Queen and who have decided through their own choice to remain a part of the former British empire in name only... we're as a country and people mature enough to be both independent and dependent towards our colonial forbears.
And yes, your Electoral College is a complete and utter hoot, the fact you still use it when an actual proper democracy (or at least the one you seem to try and espouse to the rest of the world) ie one person one vote system would be better just shows how some Americans are unable to change or see when change would help them... people bitch about California becoming the big decider, what about all the Republican voters in California? or the Democrat voters in Texas? what do their votes count for under the current system? Without the EC there actual votes would mean something!.. no wonder your country has some of the worst voter turn outs in the developed world, i wouldnt vote either if i knew my vote meant jack # in the state i lived in. Americans act like their Government system is the greatest and most glorified... yet so few of you actually bloody well partake in it for what ever reason.
If you ditched the EC you'd have an actual government of the TRUE Majority ie a Democracy (the fact there are people in this thread using the term Tyranny of the Majority is gob smacking, duh thats a fing Democracy) or at least what we consider a Democracy in modern times where every persons vote goes towards the final result... although you'd also have to bring in some form of mixed party system were coalitions could be formed given first past the post systems are just as bad as the EC, but given your dogmatic worship of your two main parties and brainwashed mindset that any other party are crayzie nut job loonies you'd have to cross that hurdle when you got to it, which would probably take another couple of hundred years to get over given your track record.
The thing i tend to see from threads like this is that without the EC the Republicans would be utterly and hopelessly screwed, hence why the right wing tend to be adamantly against the removal of it. The thing is, if the majority through a 1 person 1 vote system wanted a Democratic government why not give it to them? if the government that gets elected doesnt work for them then the next election they vote for someone else and you more than likely get a new party in for that term if not then the party in power must be working since its pleasing the majority... thats how a Democracy works isnt it?
So yeah we've long since earned the right to criticize your country, hell my little insignificant country has on a number of occasions basically stood in front of your grand glorious motherland and promptly pulled the finger and told you to # off (although our rigthwing parties have a serious trait of nesting up the USA's arse usually, but even they back off if enough people voice concerns).