It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TRUMP'S INAUGURATION MONEY IS STILL MISSING ONE YEAR AFTER HIS ADMINISTRATION TOOK CONTROL OF THE WHITE HOUSE
lmost one year after President Donald Trump took the oath of office, millions of dollars from his leftover inauguration funds have still not been donated to the charities they were promised to. Trump's inauguration committee raised a record-breaking $107 million as his administration prepared to assume the White House last year, but very little has been disclosed about where the remaining money was allocated. As the one-year anniversary of Trump's inauguration approaches, a government watchdog group is questioning why the funds disappeared, and a congressman is proposing legislation to keep future administrations from obscuring their own inaugural donations. During Trump's transition period, the organizing committee led by billionaire investor Thomas Barrack doubled the funds raised by any previous U.S. president. The money raised eyebrows among political operatives because there was nothing about the celebration that indicated it would exceed a more traditional price tag, according to Public Citizen, a liberal-leaning consumer rights advocacy group. For the group's government affairs lobbyist, Craig Holman, this has raised one key question that remains unanswered on the cusp of Trump's inaugural anniversary: Where did the extra money go?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: angeldoll
Theres also the case for foreigh money donated with express favors expected.
You know what thats called ..... pay for play....
Feds are looking to prosecute. There is a criminal investigation.
www.wsj.com...
U.S. Trump Inauguration Spending Under Criminal Investigation by Federal Prosecutors
[exnral prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions, some of the people said.
Giving money in exchange for political favors could run afoul of federal corruption laws. Diverting funds from the organization, which was registered as a nonprofit, could also violate federal law.
These podunks cant get out of their own way. He is too stupid to breath.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: Lumenari
Typical rightist response to anything even remotely incriminating against Trump and his family. Either deflect or act as if it's not a big deal and/or that if it triggers liberals it's actually a good thing.
If it were Hillary you'd be up in arms, but Trump? "The media says mean things about him so he's innocent!"
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Irishhaf
Yet now its a problem
Shouldn't it be stopped at some point though?
Why not now?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: network dude
Is this thread about the Clinton Foundation again because I could have sworn it was about trumps continuing organized crime activity.
Hotel prices in D.C. up 927% ahead of Trump’s inauguration — and protests
Prices of hotel rooms in Washington, D.C., are 927% higher than usual for the week of the ceremony, according travel website Trivago, at an average of $2,071 per night for a standard double room. Barring major events like Inauguration Day, the usual rate for a room of that type in the city tends to hover around $200 in January, at $215 in 2013, $204 in 2014, $186 in 2015, and $204 in 2016, according to Trivago.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Irishhaf
Yet now its a problem
Shouldn't it be stopped at some point though?
Why not now?
Excellent point, and yet no response to your comment which is maybe a little too reality-based?
WHY not now? Indeed.