Federal Grand Jury To Hear Evidence - World Trade Center 9-11 Was Controlled Demolition.

a reply to: tadaman

Again, no evidence of radiation above background. No evidence contamination spread to fire stations, police stations, or hospitals. No evidence radiation or contamination spread to where the WTC rubble was taken, Fresh Kills.

The toxic smoldering plastics, office furniture, and wire insulation contaminating the dust and water with chemical carcinogens more than explains the increased cancer rates.

WHILE thousands were running away from the deadly smoke, terror and carnage that was 9/11 - they were rushing in.

www.thesun.co.uk...

Deadly cocktail of poisonous air

After the two planes struck the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, fires stoked by jet fuel raged for 99 days – spewing a cocktail of carcinogenic poisons – including asbestos, benzine, chromium and lead – into the Manhattan air.

The city is approaching a terrible milestone — nearly 10,000 people have suffered cancers linked to the toxic dust and smoke at Ground Zero, The Post has learned.
nypost.com...

Thyroid Cancer Rates Are Skyrocketing From Flame Retardants
articles.mercola.com...

a reply to: tadaman

Of again, detentions of explosives generate P and S waves. Show where there was P and S waves from the WTC seismic data. Explosions cause faster frequencies in seismic waves than what was produced at the WTC. “Spikes” are just from hiw large or small pieces of the building were hiting the ground.

Below is the expected damage by a 2.3 magnitude earthquake.

2.5 to 5.4 Often felt, but only causes minor damage.
www.geo.mtu.edu...

Serious damage is not even seen until 6.0 magnitude.

And you still need to answer
Then if an underground detonation started the collapse of WTC 2, how did its core fall after the floor system. How did the buckling occur at the point of the jet impact some eighty floors up with no visible failure of the the core failing or dropping. If it was an underground detonation, how did the core offer resistance to slow down the upper 30 or 29 floors falling into the building below.

a reply to: neutronflux

Its all addressed in the provided sources.

Have a good read. I know many others will.

a reply to: tadaman

What do you not get the nuke fantasy fails on many levels.

One, no proof the WTC foundations were broken / undermined by an underground explosion.

Two: no P and S waves indicative of a detonation. The seismic data frequencies were too slow to be from a detonation.

Three, the twin tower core columns failed last. The core columns provided resistance through the entire collapse.

Four, video proves the collapse initiation of WTC 1 and WTC 2 were columns bowing then buckling at the point of jet impacts.

Five, each twin tower was reported minutes ahead of collapse to be buckling and leaning at the point of jet impacts.

Six. No evidence of underground detonation. No dust rising from the ground, no dust shaken from twin towers, no windows being broken.

Seven, no indication of radiation above background.

Eight, video and audio do not support the nuke theories.

a reply to: neutronflux

We already talked about all that buddy. Did you forget?

You are being belligerent.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Its all addressed in the provided sources.

Have a good read. I know many others will.

Again, there is zero credibility proof of nukes. The evidence you provided is pseudoscience or blatantly false narratives by the charlatans of the truth movement.

a reply to: neutronflux

Very belligerent. Dare I say, ignorant.

a reply to: tadaman

You posted a link saying there was P and S waves from the WTC. True?

Still waiting on you to post a seismic chart from a WTC collapse that shows three wave components were generated. So far you have only posted seismic data showing only surface waves? Was your cited source giving a false narrative?

a reply to: tadaman

Again,
What do you not get the nuke fantasy fails on many levels.

One, no proof the WTC foundations were broken / undermined by an underground explosion.

Two: no P and S waves indicative of a detonation. The seismic data frequencies were too slow to be from a detonation.

Three, the twin tower core columns failed last. The core columns provided resistance through the entire collapse.

Four, video proves the collapse initiation of WTC 1 and WTC 2 were columns bowing then buckling at the point of jet impacts.

Five, each twin tower was reported minutes ahead of collapse to be buckling and leaning at the point of jet impacts.

Six. No evidence of underground detonation. No dust rising from the ground, no dust shaken from twin towers, no windows being broken.

Seven, no indication of radiation above background.

Eight, video and audio do not support the nuke theories.

a reply to: neutronflux

Its on the link. I think figure 1A and 1B

Look.

a reply to: neutronflux

So very belligerent. Its cool. Your a noble soap box.

Thyroid cancer among 911 rescue workers is almost at chernobyl levels. You know that?

a reply to: tadaman

What is it like to even have DR Wood debunk explosives at the WTC, a person who blieves in space rays.

What don’t you get that the nuke theory is even a joke to most of the truth movement.

a reply to: neutronflux

Are you Mrs woods? Do you have any other source for your little copy and paste fit over here?

Its very clear you only poses a superficial understanding of all this.

You can not even explain Mrs woods theory let alone adequately use her seismic analysis for the life of you.

You can only repeat yourself since you can't actually contest evidence offered. I suspect that you may have not actually looked at a single source I offered.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Its on the link. I think figure 1A and 1B

Look.

Look at what? The collapse of the WTC towers only produced surface waves.

There are no P or S Waves, but the impacts of the buildings on the ground generated a sudden peak of short-period Rayleigh Waves.
blogs.scientificamerican.com...

a reply to: neutronflux

Look at the link my dear. Its actually a whole other web page with more of that stuff I quoted.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Are you Mrs woods? Do you have any other source for your little copy and paste fit over here?

I repeatedly cited different sources and papers stating there are no P and S waves.

Why don’t you post the WTC seismograms again to show there was a three wave component to the seismic activity.

a reply to: neutronflux

Why don’t you post the WTC seismograms again to show there was a three wave component to the seismic activity. 

Why can't you just navigate to the damn page with it?

I posted 3 analysis of it and offered my own take on it, since I understand it.

Something you can't do because you don't.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Look at the link my dear. Its actually a whole other web page with more of that stuff I quoted.

Nothing more aggravating than a conspiracists thinking their debunk photos, misquotes, and pseudoscience gives them the right to ignore questions leveled at them.

a reply to: neutronflux

Nothing more aggravating than a conspiracist

So you joined ATS because you hate people like us?

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Why can't you just navigate to the damn page with it?

Because nuke fantasy fails on many levels. And I don’t need to read propaganda if you cannot produce a valid argument.

One, no proof the WTC foundations were broken / undermined by an underground explosion.

Two: no P and S waves indicative of a detonation. The seismic data frequencies were too slow to be from a detonation.

Three, the twin tower core columns failed last. The core columns provided resistance through the entire collapse.

Four, video proves the collapse initiation of WTC 1 and WTC 2 were columns bowing then buckling at the point of jet impacts.

Five, each twin tower was reported minutes ahead of collapse to be buckling and leaning at the point of jet impacts.

Six. No evidence of underground detonation. No dust rising from the ground, no dust shaken from twin towers, no windows being broken.

Seven, no indication of radiation above background.

Eight, video and audio do not support the nuke theories.