Federal Grand Jury To Hear Evidence - World Trade Center 9-11 Was Controlled Demolition.

a reply to: tadaman

How big did you say the nuclear device used at the WTC was? How many of those devices were detonated?

How does the below help your case?

How did West, Texas Plant Explosion Register 2.1 on the Richter Scale?

www.industrytap.com...


1 TON TNT = 2.0 on Richter Scale. Richter Scale and TNT Equivalents

2.0 on Richter Scale = Approximately 1 ton TNT or 450 kg of dynamite (World War II Conventional Bomb)
2.5 on Richter Scale = Approximately 4.6 tons of TNT (World War II Blockbuster Bomb)
3.0 on Richter Scale = Approximately 29 tons of TNT (Massive Ordinance Blast)
3.5 on Richter Scale = Approximately 73 tons of TNT (Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster)

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Its how there will be a new grand jury to go over evidence. For all the years of disinfo persons like yourself, you could not end the 911 truth movement. You only wasted energy trying.

Are you disapointed that they're wasting time and energy presenting the wrong evidence to the Grand Jury?

a reply to: neutronflux

Read the thread. Already addressed.

a reply to: mrthumpy

Are you disapointed that they're wasting time and energy presenting the wrong evidence to the Grand Jury?

No. I am not retarded so I don't think that way.

Are you upset that the cover story was so weak that it didn't hold water against the glaring inconsistencies?

How do you think that future generations of geophysicists and engineers will look at the same inconsistencies we see now?

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Read the thread. Already addressed.

Then it should not be hard to quote and link to it.

I think you said 1k ton. So, by the above chart, the detonation would be greater than 3.5 on Richter Scale? What was the magnitude of the seismic activity you claimed could not be accounted for by jet impacts or building collapse alone.

What was the magnitude in seismic activity for WTC 7 in relation to what size nuke you said was used?

Might help if you produced a time line of when supposed nuclear devices were set off on 9/11, and the supposed size equivalent in TNT?

a reply to: tadaman

Can you answer the below?

I think you said 1k ton. So, by the above chart, the detonation would be greater than 3.5 on Richter Scale? What was the magnitude of the seismic activity you claimed could not be accounted for by jet impacts or building collapse alone.

What was the magnitude in seismic activity for WTC 7 in relation to what size nuke you said was used?

Might help if you produced a time line of when supposed nuclear devices were set off on 9/11, and the supposed size equivalent in TNT?

The chart below if you need it again.

How did West, Texas Plant Explosion Register 2.1 on the Richter Scale?

www.industrytap.com...


1 TON TNT = 2.0 on Richter Scale. Richter Scale and TNT Equivalents

2.0 on Richter Scale = Approximately 1 ton TNT or 450 kg of dynamite (World War II Conventional Bomb)
2.5 on Richter Scale = Approximately 4.6 tons of TNT (World War II Blockbuster Bomb)
3.0 on Richter Scale = Approximately 29 tons of TNT (Massive Ordinance Blast)
3.5 on Richter Scale = Approximately 73 tons of TNT (Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster)

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: mrthumpy

Are you disapointed that they're wasting time and energy presenting the wrong evidence to the Grand Jury?

No. I am not retarded so I don't think that way.

You're happy that the Grand Jury are going to throw this out? Weird

a reply to: neutronflux

Already addressed. Read the thread. For once.

a reply to: mrthumpy

Predictions? LoL

Are you upset that after 20 years people still won't believe the obvious lie and inconsistent cover story?

Are you guys even trying hard?

By all means, continue to make emotionally based psychic predictions.

Its desperate and I love that.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: mrthumpy

Predictions? LoL

I thought it was nukes that brought down the towers?

a reply to: mrthumpy

You said:

You're happy that the Grand Jury are going to throw this out? Weird

That is a prediction. I thought you had cold facts to detract from those I offered.

Is it that you are psychic?

I did give evidence of why it was a large subterranean explosion. What the actual explosive device was remains to be determined.

I could be wrong about my PERSONAL interpretation of the data. I don't think I am though after researching it for years and the mounting evidence as time passes.

There is no doubt that an underground explosive force of large magnitude caused the collapse and is the source for the anomalous seismic signatures.

Not plane impacts.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

Already addressed. Read the thread. For once.

I guess the posted chart kicked out another leg of your proof.

Funny individuals debunkeking your nuke fantasy find new angles and cited sources to prove there is no credible evidence of nukes. And you are down to not posting your supposed proof because it will be debunked?

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: mrthumpy

You said

You're happy that the Grand Jury are going to throw this out? Weird

That is a prediction. I thought you had cold facts to detract from those I offered.

Is it that you are psychic?

I know what I said. Surely it's a foregone conclusion though since the Grand Jury will be presented with false evidence

a reply to: neutronflux

That's a statement of opinion.

As evidenced in this thread, it is a misinformed opinion.

The evidence stands.

a reply to: mrthumpy

You have not proven its false evidence. You and your tag team partner here only disagreed with it, without valid reasons to.

At least, none you could articulate and explain adequately.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: mrthumpy

You said:

You're happy that the Grand Jury are going to throw this out? Weird

That is a prediction. I thought you had cold facts to detract from those I offered.

Is it that you are psychic?

I did give evidence of why it was a large subterranean explosion. What the actual explosive device was remains to be determined.

I could be wrong about my PERSONAL interpretation of the data. I don't think I am though after researching it for years and the mounting evidence as time passes.

There is no doubt that an underground explosive force of large magnitude caused the collapse and is the source for the anomalous seismic signatures.

Not plane impacts.

Oh I thought it was the magical properties of the nuclear blast under the towers that made them start collapsing from the top.

a reply to: mrthumpy

They are not magical, though to those who can not understand it may seem like magic.

2 identical collapsing towers cannot produce the forces as recorded and as I explained.

As a demolition person, bullcrap. Not a chance.

Fred..