It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
Honestly mate, taxes are low for average folk here, I have a few millionaire mates who moan about taxes but they are property 'tycoons' with high income. Non millionaires aren't taxed too bad in the UK...I'm a non-millionaire for the record, lazy bastard only work to cover my needs lol
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Xtrozero
I would seek those fundamental changes if I was a US citizen. I massively support my taxes providing my healthcare and the care for fellow citizens.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: eletheia
What are the average wait times?
Depends what it is. For an emergency they get you in ASAP. For elective surgery you might have to wait a bit, depending on the nature of the surgery.
An example: Last year I was bitten by something (I never found out what, perhaps a spider or a mosquito) on the elbow in the middle of the night. At 3am I woke up, felt the itch, scratched mightily and fell asleep again. In the morning my elbow was a bit swollen and by lunchtime it was really swollen. When my wife came back from work it was still swollen and there was a red line going up the inside of my arm in the direction of my armpit. She takes one look, goes as pale as a ghost, says "Blood poisoning" and then gets me in the car and drives me to the nearest A&E (the British version of an ER). There I was assessed within an hour, had blood taken for tests, had what looked like the equivalent amount of penicillin pumped into me and was then discharged after about two hours, having been given an box of large pills and instructions to come back the next day to be checked over. My life had been saved as I had blood poisoning that if left untreated could have killed me. Total cost to us? About £5 in parking fees for the car park.
What paid for my treatment? The NHS, which I have paying into since I was 18 years old.
originally posted by: bastion
Though NHS privatisation is sadly a done deal (goes back to John Major introducing PFI/PPI, Blair steamrolling it awarding Branson the contracts to mental health and 111 calling themselves 'NHS Care'. All A & E and Trauma wards in Lancashire close pretty soon, there's only one private hospital in the county (Lostock Hall) - have leaked photos of receipts for care from DRs and bills are crazy (chemo treatment is something like £5k a day) - will post pics if anyone wants to see (need to remove meta data first, been somethings I've been campaigning against for 10 years or so).
The great PFI heist:
PFI debt for the British taxpayer is more than £300bn for infrastructure projects, with a value of £54.7bn. To put it into perspective, the PFI debt is four times the size of the budget deficit used to justify austerity
Sir Howard Davies, chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), recently made an astonishing admission on BBC1’s Question Time when he stated that private finance initiatives (PFI) had been a “fraud on the people”. Beyond seemingly populist rhetoric, the real story of PFI reveals that RBS alongside other global banks, notably HSBC, were instrumental in what Sir Howard has effectively labelled a great heist.
It was a persuasive argument which seduced many. The Blairite Third Way would somehow square the circle by delivering new schools, hospitals, roads, railways and prisons without the debt or inefficiency of the public sector. It seemed too good to be true yet those who dared to question the orthodoxy du jour were swatted away.
As early as 1999, Richard Smith, editor of the British Medical Journal, denounced it as “PFI: Perfidious Financial Idiocy” in an editorial revealing that repayments would be exorbitant. In the same year, Professor Allyson Pollock and colleagues published a paper sounding the alarm over the potentially disastrous consequences of PFI debt and the financialisation of public services.
It later transpired that the process of bringing in PFI had not exactly been transparent. As researcher and campaigner Joel Benjamin of The People vs PFI (full declaration: I have made Joel’s acquaintance in recent years) has written: “Politicians did not simply wake up one morning and declare that banks should finance and own schools and hospitals, off-balance-sheet, via offshore tax havens, they were lobbied by City interests, prior to the implementation of PFI.”
For a golden period, Gordon Brown’s apparent vanquishment of boom and bust kept any problems in check. But when the financial crisis was followed by the diktats of austerity, PFI began to unravel. South London Healthcare Trust became the first NHS trust to go bust in the summer of 2012, having found itself on the hook for huge PFI costs.
The total bill for NHS PFI hospitals is ultimately projected to rise above £79bn, way in excess of original build costs of £11.4bn.
****Many PFI contracts came with strings attached, “facilities maintenance” often subcontracted on a long-term basis as part of the deal. As a result, only specific contractors are allowed to change or fix certain equipment or fittings, such as a plug socket or a light bulb. A Daily Telegraph investigation flagged up several egregious examples but this one really stood out: one hospital was charged £52,000 for a job which should have cost £750.****
Define 'well covered', please.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: CornishCeltGuy
a reply to: Xtrozero
I would seek those fundamental changes if I was a US citizen. I massively support my taxes providing my healthcare and the care for fellow citizens.
Those changes will not come anytime soon, remember 90% of Americans are well covered. The changes would need to go down the path of making a new system at first to those in need, outside the insurance umbrella.
That's interesting. I've seen the change on ATS over the years with US members. This thread 10 years ago would have been shouted down as commie bastards, but not so much these days, only one or two members are happy for cancer victims to lose their homes for medical bills now.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: CornishCeltGuy
Democrats are coalescing around this being their #1 priority in the new Congress on 1/1/19. They suddenly realized that improving America's Healthcare System is why they won the U.S. House. All polls showed this to be #1 for Americans.